UCLA
2011 Team Stats (7 games)
75.6
PPG
69.4
Opp
+6.1
Margin
47.5%
FG%
30.9%
3P%
65.5%
FT%
37.3
RPG
14.9
APG
13.7
TO
-
Est. poss./game
71.8
Adj PPG
62.6
Adj Opp PPG
#61
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1187 (#71) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1166 (#59) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1074 (#64) | HCA +91 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +10.2 (#59) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +10.2 (#52) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.633 (#101) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.870 (#52) | AdjNet +16.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.873 (#51) | AdjNet +16.7 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.697 (#61) | AdjO 71.8 | AdjD 62.6 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.622 (#64) | AdjO 68.3 | AdjD 62.8 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.745 (#56) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.732 (#54) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1166 (#61) | RD 113 | GP 30 |
2011 Schedule & Results
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reeves Nelson
|
F | 20 | 31.9 | 13.8 | 9.0 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 2.6 | 5.3 | 17.4 | 18 | 26 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 57.9 | 11.1 | 67.2 | -1.88 | 102.1 | 58.4 |
Tyler Honeycutt
|
F | 20 | 36.1 | 13.6 | 6.8 | 2.7 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 6.4 | 16.4 | 84 | 25 | 3.4 | 4.1 | 46.9 | 50.9 | 73.2 | 1.86 | 93.1 | 57.8 |
Malcolm Lee
|
G | 20 | 34.2 | 11.7 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.4 | 5.0 | 11.7 | 108 | 25 | 4.3 | 5.5 | 36.4 | 18.2 | 76.0 | 4.57 | 96.3 | 39.4 |
Joshua Smith
|
C | 19 | 23.0 | 11.6 | 6.3 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 3.9 | 14.8 | 139 | 26 | 5.3 | 10.2 | 58.1 | 0 | 59.6 | 3.77 | 114.1 | 58.1 |
Lazeric Jones
|
G | 20 | 27.8 | 9.1 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 4.3 | 9.7 | 87 | 26 | 3.3 | 5.0 | 39.1 | 28.9 | 84.6 | 1.44 | 87.4 | 45.4 |
Jerime Anderson
|
G | 20 | 20.6 | 6.0 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 7.2 | 40 | 26 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 30.8 | 27.3 | 59.1 | 1.19 | 124.3 | 34.6 |
Brendan Lane
|
F | 20 | 11.7 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 4.0 | 27 | 25 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 52.2 | 16.7 | 58.3 | -0.66 | 77.8 | 54.3 |
Tyler Trapani
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | - | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | -1.18 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Tyler Lamb
|
G | 20 | 10.8 | 1.9 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 37 | 26 | 1.4 | 5.1 | 25.0 | 7.7 | 83.3 | -0.17 | 53.4 | 26.6 |
Anthony Stover
|
C | 18 | 9.1 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.7 | -39 | 24 | -1.6 | -9.4 | 44.4 | 0 | 23.1 | -3.2 | 51.0 | 44.4 |
Blake Arnet
|
G | 4 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | -15 | 6 | -2.5 | -75.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | -3.05 | 53.2 | 0.0 |
Matt DeMarcus
|
G | 2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | -0.5 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -1.49 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Alex Schrempf
|
F | 2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1.49 | 0 | 0 |
Jack Haley
|
G | 2 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -1.47 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG