UCF
2011 Team Stats (8 games)
72.5
PPG
63.6
Opp
+8.9
Margin
45.9%
FG%
32.9%
3P%
69.3%
FT%
37.1
RPG
11.5
APG
14.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
67.5
Adj PPG
61.7
Adj Opp PPG
#85
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1094 (#113) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1129 (#80) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1021 (#129) | HCA +91 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +6.2 (#85) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +2.7 (#131) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.698 (#72) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.777 (#82) | AdjNet +10.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.782 (#82) | AdjNet +11.0 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.630 (#85) | AdjO 67.5 | AdjD 61.7 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.524 (#143) | AdjO 65.0 | AdjD 64.0 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.654 (#92) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.634 (#93) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1134 (#76) | RD 102 | GP 30 |
2011 Schedule & Results
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marcus Jordan
|
G | 23 | 32.6 | 15.1 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 2.9 | 4.6 | 14.3 | 54 | 27 | 2.0 | 2.7 | 50.0 | 40.5 | 78.5 | -0.44 | 128.9 | 57.1 |
Keith Clanton
|
F | 23 | 31.7 | 13.7 | 7.3 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 4.6 | 18.4 | 99 | 27 | 3.7 | 5.1 | 53.3 | 35.3 | 73.7 | 2.48 | 121.5 | 56.2 |
Isaac Sosa
|
G | 23 | 25.0 | 7.2 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 2.9 | 6.6 | 91 | 27 | 3.4 | 5.7 | 34.3 | 30.4 | 75.0 | 0.56 | 117.7 | 44.8 |
A.J. Rompza
|
G | 22 | 25.6 | 5.7 | 2.3 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 116 | 25 | 4.6 | 7.8 | 28.6 | 25.0 | 65.4 | 1.54 | 93.4 | 34.8 |
Tom Herzog
|
C | 21 | 15.8 | 5.6 | 3.7 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 9.1 | 63 | 24 | 2.6 | 6.7 | 63.6 | 0 | 66.7 | 0.94 | 147.7 | 63.6 |
A.J. Tyler
|
F | 21 | 16.8 | 5.4 | 2.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 7.4 | 38 | 21 | 1.8 | 4.5 | 22.6 | 17.6 | 80.0 | 1.37 | 159.6 | 27.4 |
P.J. Gaynor
|
F | 23 | 17.1 | 4.4 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 6.0 | -9 | 27 | -0.3 | -0.8 | 43.3 | 28.6 | 87.5 | -3.38 | 152.1 | 50.0 |
Isaiah Sykes
|
G | 22 | 15.9 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 6.5 | 78 | 26 | 3.0 | 7.8 | 65.7 | 0 | 60.6 | 0.98 | 95.9 | 65.7 |
Dave Diakite
|
F | 16 | 9.3 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 3.8 | 33 | 21 | 1.6 | 6.1 | 39.1 | 33.3 | 57.1 | -1.01 | 80.6 | 43.5 |
Dwight McCombs
|
C | 22 | 10.8 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 4.2 | 21 | 26 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 64.7 | 0 | 66.7 | -0.31 | 131.2 | 64.7 |
Amara Thompson
|
G | 2 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | -14 | 8 | -1.8 | -34.6 | 100.0 | 0 | 50.0 | -2.92 | 72.5 | 100.0 |
Taylor Young
|
G | 14 | 7.3 | 1.7 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 2.1 | -1 | 23 | 0.0 | -0.3 | 55.6 | 42.9 | 100.0 | -0.75 | 121.5 | 72.2 |
Jarvis Davis
|
G | 9 | 4.9 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 20 | 12 | 1.7 | 10.6 | 40.0 | 0 | 42.9 | 1.37 | 43.3 | 40.0 |
Dogukan Kuzucan
|
G | 5 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | -14 | 9 | -1.6 | -44.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -2.64 | 100.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG