TCU
2011 Team Stats (7 games)
60.3
PPG
71.0
Opp
-10.7
Margin
40.5%
FG%
37.0%
3P%
63.7%
FT%
30.0
RPG
14.9
APG
11.9
TO
-
Est. poss./game
67.1
Adj PPG
66.6
Adj Opp PPG
#157
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 956 (#191) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 927 (#222) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 884 (#315) | HCA +91 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +0.9 (#156) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | -0.2 (#171) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.387 (#226) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.538 (#152) | AdjNet +1.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.539 (#152) | AdjNet +1.3 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.512 (#157) | AdjO 67.1 | AdjD 66.6 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.450 (#223) | AdjO 63.5 | AdjD 65.7 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.446 (#190) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.434 (#208) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 933 (#218) | RD 136 | GP 32 |
2011 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11-12 | vs | Jackson State Tigers | W | 86 - 62 |
| 2010-11-16 | vs | SMU Mustangs | W | 84 - 64 |
| 2010-11-20 | vs | Rider Broncs | L | 61 - 76 |
| 2010-11-21 | @ | Bradley Braves | W | 74 - 68 |
| 2010-11-22 | vs | UMass Minutemen | L | 48 - 67 |
| 2010-11-27 | vs | Houston Cougars | W | 79 - 63 |
| 2010-11-29 | vs | USC Trojans | W | 81 - 69 |
| 2010-12-01 | vs | Prairie View A&M Panthers | W | 78 - 61 |
| 2010-12-04 | vs | Northern Iowa Panthers | L | 60 - 64 |
| 2010-12-08 | @ | Texas Tech Red Raiders | W | 81 - 77 |
| 2010-12-11 | @ | Nebraska Cornhuskers | L | 56 - 70 |
| 2010-12-21 | vs | Northwestern State Demons | W | 96 - 79 |
| 2010-12-28 | vs | Chicago State Cougars | W | 99 - 72 |
| 2010-12-30 | @ | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | L | 66 - 69 |
| 2011-01-02 | @ | Rice Owls | L | 61 - 70 |
| 2011-01-05 | vs | San Diego State Aztecs | L | 53 - 66 |
| 2011-01-08 | @ | UNLV Rebels | L | 49 - 83 |
| 2011-01-12 | vs | Wyoming Cowboys | W | 78 - 60 |
| 2011-01-15 | @ | Colorado State Rams | L | 69 - 79 |
| 2011-01-18 | @ | BYU Cougars | L | 67 - 83 |
| 2011-01-22 | vs | Utah Utes | L | 62 - 75 |
| 2011-01-26 | @ | New Mexico Lobos | L | 46 - 71 |
| 2011-01-29 | vs | Air Force Falcons | L | 65 - 66 |
| 2011-02-05 | @ | San Diego State Aztecs | L | 53 - 60 |
| 2011-02-09 | vs | UNLV Rebels | L | 79 - 94 |
| 2011-02-16 | vs | Colorado State Rams | L | 55 - 69 |
| 2011-02-19 | vs | BYU Cougars | L | 56 - 79 |
| 2011-02-22 | @ | Utah Utes | L | 48 - 50 |
| 2011-02-26 | vs | New Mexico Lobos | L | 70 - 80 |
| 2011-03-02 | @ | Air Force Falcons | L | 65 - 70 |
| 2011-03-09 | @ | Wyoming Cowboys | W | 70 - 61 |
| 2011-03-10 | @ | BYU Cougars | L | 58 - 64 |
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ronnie Moss
|
G | 7 | 31.0 | 17.0 | 5.0 | 2.4 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 3.7 | 7.4 | 14.6 | 31 | 19 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 46.2 | 42.9 | 88.9 | 2.25 | 106.3 | 54.8 |
Hank Thorns
|
G | 18 | 36.9 | 11.8 | 4.0 | 8.4 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 2.6 | 6.4 | 16.2 | -114 | 31 | -3.7 | -4.8 | 31.9 | 27.9 | 63.2 | -1.65 | 85.2 | 37.1 |
Garlon Green
|
G | 18 | 30.6 | 10.4 | 4.8 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.4 | 4.0 | 11.8 | -57 | 32 | -1.8 | -2.7 | 43.1 | 51.5 | 77.8 | 0.36 | 123.7 | 54.9 |
Greg Hill
|
G | 18 | 24.8 | 8.9 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 3.7 | 8.4 | -79 | 28 | -2.8 | -6.2 | 36.4 | 41.9 | 83.3 | -1.39 | 108.9 | 50.0 |
Nikola Cerina
|
F | 18 | 24.9 | 7.6 | 5.2 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 10.8 | 14 | 32 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 44.7 | 0.0 | 55.0 | 2.79 | 122.8 | 44.7 |
J.R. Cadot
|
G | 17 | 25.9 | 7.4 | 5.7 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 3.1 | 11.3 | -10 | 31 | -0.3 | -0.6 | 60.4 | 50.0 | 61.1 | 0.66 | 102.6 | 62.3 |
Amric Fields
|
F | 18 | 22.3 | 6.6 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 6.9 | -97 | 32 | -3.0 | -7.1 | 34.8 | 15.4 | 57.1 | -2.76 | 114.1 | 37.0 |
Sammy Yeager
|
F | 2 | 19.0 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 44 | 15 | 2.9 | 6.0 | 42.9 | 50.0 | 0 | 1.69 | 57.1 | 57.1 |
Nikola Gacesa
|
F | 15 | 16.7 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 3.4 | -90 | 29 | -3.1 | -7.0 | 29.6 | 33.3 | 40.0 | -3.7 | 75.3 | 35.2 |
Jarvis Ray
|
G | 16 | 8.4 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.8 | -15 | 26 | -0.6 | -2.9 | 14.3 | 0.0 | 33.3 | 0.06 | 90.1 | 14.3 |
Cheick Kone
|
C | 5 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.4 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 50.0 | -1.47 | 26.6 | 0.0 |
Marin Bavcevic
|
G | 4 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 0.0 | -0.5 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2.36 | 0 | 0 |
Zach Huie
|
F | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Thomas Montigel
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Zack Price
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG