Princeton
2012 Team Stats (4 games)
71.5
PPG
62.5
Opp
+4.4
Margin
52.6%
FG%
37.1%
3P%
78.7%
FT%
33.0
RPG
14.3
APG
12.3
TO
69.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1308 (#164) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1419 (#86) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +26.7 (#115) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.733 (#18) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.867 (#15) | NetEff +17.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.546 (#59) | AdjNet +1.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.547 (#59) | AdjNet +1.6 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I. Hummer
|
C | 31 | 32.1 | 16.0 | 7.3 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 2.7 | 5.4 | 21.1 | - | - | - | 50.6 | 32.3 | 65.7 | - | 125.6 | 53.6 |
D. Davis
|
G | 31 | 33.1 | 13.8 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 4.6 | 12.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 41.5 | 37.8 | 84.6 | 1.05 | 139.5 | 51.4 |
T.J. Bray
|
G | 31 | 33.4 | 7.3 | 4.6 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 13.2 | - | - | - | 54.8 | 47.2 | 62.5 | - | 130.3 | 66.4 |
M. Darrow
|
C | 31 | 21.4 | 7.0 | 3.5 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 2.1 | 10.5 | - | - | - | 47.0 | 43.8 | 88.1 | - | 127.8 | 57.6 |
P. Saunders
|
F | 31 | 22.9 | 6.7 | 2.6 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 7.5 | - | - | - | 46.6 | 35.1 | 85.7 | - | 132.0 | 55.5 |
B. Connolly
|
C | 31 | 18.7 | 5.8 | 3.6 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 8.7 | - | - | - | 54.5 | 0 | 53.6 | - | 133.7 | 54.5 |
D. Koon
|
F | 30 | 17.0 | 5.3 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 6.6 | - | - | - | 54.5 | 0.0 | 66.7 | - | 124.5 | 54.5 |
W. Barrett
|
F | 7 | 18.1 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 3.4 | 5.9 | - | - | - | 29.2 | 25.0 | 66.7 | - | 52.6 | 37.5 |
B. Hazel
|
G | 17 | 11.8 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 2.9 | - | - | - | 28.0 | 30.0 | 0.0 | - | 67.6 | 40.0 |
J. Comfort
|
F | 18 | 6.2 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 2.4 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 228.4 | 28.6 |
J. Sherburne
|
G | 26 | 8.5 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 2.9 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 16.7 | 62.5 | - | 102.2 | 52.8 |
B. Garbade
|
C | 9 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | - | 116.7 | 66.7 |
C. Clement
|
G | 9 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.8 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 33.3 | 0 | - | 62.5 | 62.5 |
D. Edwards
|
F | 8 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.6 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 250.0 | 100.0 |
B. Fabrizius
|
F | 6 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 150.0 | 0.0 |
C. Wilson
|
G | 10 | 4.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 23 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1.13 | 83.3 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG