Oregon Ducks
2013 Team Stats (19 games)
67.1
PPG
63.6
Opp
+8.0
Margin
43.6%
FG%
32.6%
3P%
66.4%
FT%
35.3
RPG
12.3
APG
14.8
TO
79.2
Pace
Model Outputs
2012-2013
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1451 (#92) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1609 (#12) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1179 (#9) | HCA +147 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +35.5 (#35) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +23.1 (#21) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.669 (#28) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.568 (#84) | NetEff +2.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.803 (#21) | AdjNet +12.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.801 (#23) | AdjNet +12.0 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.730 (#21) | AdjO 70.8 | AdjD 59.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.911 (#19) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.897 (#18) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1319 (#17) | RD 94 | GP 36 |
2013 Schedule & Results
2013 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E.J. Singler
|
F | 37 | 31.0 | 11.7 | 4.9 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 5.6 | 12.5 | 199 | 5.4 | 7.8 | 42.5 | 37.5 | 79.7 | 1.37 | 91.0 | 50.5 |
D. Dotson
|
G | 37 | 27.9 | 11.4 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 5.7 | 9.7 | - | - | - | 40.8 | 28.6 | 66.7 | 1.39 | 90.5 | 46.0 |
C. Emory
|
F | 37 | 26.3 | 11.1 | 4.4 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 2.0 | 5.3 | 10.2 | 155 | 4.2 | 6.3 | 48.0 | 27.7 | 66.7 | 0.72 | 91.1 | 51.3 |
A. Kazemi
|
F | 35 | 29.0 | 9.4 | 10.0 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 3.3 | 18.6 | 160 | 4.6 | 6.7 | 60.3 | 0 | 67.4 | 0.75 | 104.8 | 60.3 |
T. Woods
|
C | 37 | 21.0 | 8.9 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.6 | 3.2 | 9.3 | 132 | 3.6 | 7.6 | 49.6 | 0 | 67.2 | 0.88 | 112.5 | 49.6 |
D. Artis
|
G | 28 | 23.8 | 8.5 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 10.1 | 152 | 5.4 | 9.7 | 35.6 | 45.0 | 64.0 | 1.13 | 121.4 | 46.0 |
D. Osei
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 40.0 | 0 | - | 66.7 | 66.7 |
J. Loyd
|
G | 37 | 22.1 | 5.0 | 1.6 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 6.2 | 179 | 4.8 | 8.8 | 35.5 | 25.5 | 59.5 | 1.2 | 74.1 | 41.1 |
W. Austin
|
C | 35 | 11.0 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 4.8 | 83 | 2.4 | 7.9 | 37.3 | 0 | 46.2 | 0.67 | 87.3 | 37.3 |
A. Thomas
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 200 | 5.6 | 8.4 | 12.5 | 25.0 | 0 | 0.73 | 18.8 | 18.8 |
A. Kuemper
|
F | 9 | 5.7 | 2.4 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 25 | 2.8 | 10.5 | 66.7 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0.04 | 159.9 | 75.0 |
B. Carter
|
F | 37 | 10.4 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 4.5 | 141 | 3.8 | 11.8 | 35.0 | 0 | 75.0 | 1.22 | 91.2 | 35.0 |
F. Richardson III
|
G | 10 | 5.1 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 2.6 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 50.0 | 75.0 | - | 154.6 | 41.7 |
M. Carpenter
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
W. Moore
|
G | 26 | 6.9 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 11 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 32.0 | 12.5 | 71.4 | -0.17 | 85.0 | 34.0 |
N. Lucenti
|
G | 8 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 17 | 2.4 | 18.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.16 | 200.0 | 0.0 |
C. Baker
|
G | 12 | 2.7 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 25 | 2.3 | 11.4 | 50.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.32 | 100.0 | 75.0 |
D. Love
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | -243 | -8.1 | -11.7 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -0.93 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG