๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

North Texas Mean Green

Also known as: North Texas Mean Green
Program History

2026 Team Stats (33 games)

70.6
PPG
62.1
Opp
+8.5
Margin
41.0%
FG%
34.1%
3P%
69.4%
FT%
41.2
RPG
12.0
APG
16.7
TO
73.3
Est. poss./game
67.2
Adj PPG
60.4
Adj Opp PPG
#97
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2025-2026
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 1121 (#115) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 1053 (#150) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +106 elo More โ†’ 1044 (#125) HCA +106 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.4 More โ†’ +7.4 (#94) HCA +2.4
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.6 More โ†’ +8.7 (#80) HCA +2.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.711 (#103) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +6.8 More โ†’ 0.711 (#103) NetEff +6.8
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +11.6 More โ†’ 0.791 (#96) AdjNet +11.6
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +11.7 More โ†’ 0.795 (#98) AdjNet +11.7
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 67.2 | AdjD 60.4 More โ†’ 0.650 (#97) AdjO 67.2 | AdjD 60.4
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 68.1 | AdjD 62.0 More โ†’ 0.636 (#85) AdjO 68.1 | AdjD 62.0
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.683 (#99) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.681 (#101) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 126 | GP 31 More โ†’ 1078 (#129) RD 126 | GP 31

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2025-11-03 vs Oklahoma Christian Eagles W 106 - 36
2025-11-07 vs Grambling Lady Tigers W 89 - 49
2025-11-13 vs Nelson (TX) Lions W 102 - 50
2025-11-19 vs Abilene Christian Wildcats L 51 - 60
2025-11-22 @ SMU Mustangs W 58 - 55
2025-11-26 vs Saint Mary's Gaels W 67 - 65
2025-11-27 vs Texas Tech Lady Raiders L 47 - 67
2025-12-03 vs Oklahoma State Cowgirls L 55 - 73
2025-12-06 vs Texas Southern Tigers W 81 - 52
2025-12-14 @ Illinois Fighting Illini L 69 - 81
2025-12-18 vs Oral Roberts Golden Eagles L 73 - 74
2025-12-21 vs Santa Clara Broncos L 72 - 84
2025-12-30 @ Florida Atlantic Owls W 81 - 56
2026-01-03 @ South Florida Bulls L 61 - 77
2026-01-06 vs East Carolina Pirates W 87 - 63
2026-01-10 @ Tulane Green Wave W 59 - 53
2026-01-13 vs Memphis Tigers W 75 - 64
2026-01-17 vs Rice Owls L 54 - 58
2026-01-20 @ UAB Blazers W 72 - 59
2026-01-23 vs Tulsa Golden Hurricane L 53 - 57
2026-01-28 @ UTSA Roadrunners L 64 - 66
2026-01-31 vs Florida Atlantic Owls W 67 - 49
2026-02-07 @ Temple Owls W 69 - 66
2026-02-10 @ Rice Owls L 68 - 70
2026-02-14 vs Tulane Green Wave W 56 - 47
2026-02-17 vs UAB Blazers W 84 - 54
2026-02-21 @ Charlotte 49ers W 82 - 73
2026-02-24 vs UTSA Roadrunners W 87 - 63
2026-02-28 vs South Florida Bulls L 63 - 66
2026-03-03 @ Wichita State Shockers L 55 - 60
2026-03-11 vs Florida Atlantic Owls W 80 - 57
2026-03-12 @ Tulsa Golden Hurricane W 76 - 73
2026-03-13 @ Rice Owls L 67 - 71

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Aysia Proctor Aysia Proctor G 32 29.5 14.1 2.8 1.1 1.4 0.4 1.9 12.7 5.2 159 29 5.5 7.6 42.0 39.3 70.7 1.37 51.6 49.3
Megan Nestor Megan Nestor F 33 27.8 12.8 14.1 1.5 1.5 0.6 2.8 8.3 19.4 207 29 7.1 10.6 56.4 0 67.9 2.07 60.8 56.4
Andi Schissler Andi Schissler G 33 24.7 8.6 2.1 1.7 0.7 0.4 1.5 8.3 3.6 170 29 5.9 10.3 37.4 36.2 58.8 3.58 49.1 48.2
Jazzy Owens-Barnett Jazzy Owens-Barnett G 31 22.9 8.0 2.1 2.1 0.9 0.1 2.2 6.2 4.8 148 28 5.3 9.5 35.4 30.8 79.4 2.24 49.7 37.5
Mekhia Chase Mekhia Chase G 32 22.1 6.8 3.4 1.6 0.7 0.2 1.6 7.0 4.2 93 28 3.3 6.2 35.4 30.2 74.6 -0.99 43.8 39.0
Tiffany Hammond Tiffany Hammond G 14 21.4 6.6 1.9 2.0 1.2 0.0 1.4 5.9 4.4 24 10 2.4 4.8 38.6 32.2 60.0 -0.27 51.3 50.0
Chania Price Chania Price G 33 23.5 6.3 3.2 1.0 1.1 0.1 1.4 5.9 4.4 144 29 5.0 8.7 38.3 32.4 78.0 0.34 46.6 41.1
Cherie Spencer Cherie Spencer G 32 19.3 5.2 2.2 1.8 1.3 0.1 2.0 5.6 3.0 107 28 3.8 8.0 33.3 28.1 62.9 0.81 40.5 35.8
Tionna Lidge Tionna Lidge F 31 14.2 4.9 3.6 0.4 0.4 0.7 1.0 4.4 4.5 52 27 1.9 5.8 47.8 0.0 64.7 -0.69 50.3 47.8
Adhel Tac Adhel Tac F 6 6.7 1.7 0.8 0.3 0.0 0.3 1.2 1.5 0.5 - - - - 55.6 0.0 0 -2.34 55.6 55.6
Jaelyn Talley Jaelyn Talley F 28 8.7 1.7 1.9 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.6 1.6 2.0 19 24 0.8 4.3 44.4 0.0 38.9 -1.82 44.4 44.4
Shelby Thornton Shelby Thornton F 20 4.1 1.3 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.2 1.2 -40 16 -2.5 -26.1 36.0 0.0 50.0 -5.98 40.6 36.0
Allison Rickman Allison Rickman F 14 4.3 0.2 0.9 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.1 -10 13 -0.8 -7.0 9.1 0.0 50.0 -2.83 12.6 9.1
Laynee Stanley Laynee Stanley F 0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

Alumni in the Pros

Former North Texas Mean Green players in WNBA 2026, matched by provider player ids (ESPN athlete ids, ESPN bios, linked StatsNBA/EuroLeague ids). Only games after their last North Texas Mean Green game count. These are observed results, not certified complete seasons. League and team are where each player last played a regular-season or playoff game (NBA ahead of G League when he played in both); recent games include the preseason.

Alumni around the leagues: recent games

Date Player League Team Opponent MIN PTS REB AST Box
2026-04-29 Megan Nestor WNBA Preseason Chicago Sky vs Atlanta Dream 11 2 1 1 Box
2026-04-25 Megan Nestor WNBA Preseason Chicago Sky @ Phoenix Mercury 10 4 3 0 Box

2025-2026 Shot Zones

2051 located field-goal attempts in 33 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Nestor31% Nestor24% Proctor37% Proctor33% Proctor24% Proctor33% Proctor60% Proctor35% Schissler38% Schissler33%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Nestor21% Nestor16% Proctor33% Proctor28% Proctor21% Proctor38% Proctor28% Schissler28% Schissler36% Schissler34%
Misses: who misses most here

Aysia ProctorMegan NestorAndi Schissler

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 236-414 57.0 472 Megan Nestor 31% (146 pts) Chania Price 13% (60 pts) Megan Nestor 21% (38 misses) Chania Price 12% (22 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 317-730 43.4 634 Megan Nestor 24% (154 pts) Aysia Proctor 15% (98 pts) Megan Nestor 16% (67 misses) Mekhia Chase 15% (60 misses)
Mid-range left 51-149 34.2 102 Aysia Proctor 37% (38 pts) Andi Schissler 18% (18 pts) Aysia Proctor 33% (32 misses) Jazzy Owens-Barnett 16% (16 misses)
Mid-range center 24-74 32.4 48 Aysia Proctor 33% (16 pts) Cherie Spencer 21% (10 pts) Aysia Proctor 28% (14 misses) Jazzy Owens-Barnett 16% (8 misses)
Mid-range right 41-164 25.0 82 Aysia Proctor 24% (20 pts) Andi Schissler 15% (12 pts) Aysia Proctor 21% (26 misses) Cherie Spencer 18% (22 misses)
Left corner 3 15-39 38.5 45 Aysia Proctor 33% (15 pts) Mekhia Chase 20% (9 pts) Aysia Proctor 38% (9 misses) Tiffany Hammond 17% (4 misses)
Right corner 3 5-23 21.7 15 Aysia Proctor 60% (9 pts) Chania Price 20% (3 pts) Aysia Proctor 28% (5 misses) Andi Schissler 22% (4 misses)
Above-break 3 left 72-223 32.3 216 Aysia Proctor 35% (75 pts) Andi Schissler 33% (72 pts) Andi Schissler 28% (42 misses) Aysia Proctor 25% (37 misses)
Above-break 3 center 32-90 35.6 96 Andi Schissler 38% (36 pts) Aysia Proctor 31% (30 pts) Andi Schissler 36% (21 misses) Aysia Proctor 28% (16 misses)
Above-break 3 right 48-145 33.1 144 Andi Schissler 33% (48 pts) Aysia Proctor 31% (45 pts) Andi Schissler 34% (33 misses) Aysia Proctor 24% (23 misses)