Michigan State
2020 Team Stats (23 games)
75.0
PPG
63.0
Opp
+12.0
Margin
45.9%
FG%
34.4%
3P%
76.4%
FT%
40.7
RPG
17.6
APG
12.0
TO
78.5
Pace
Model Outputs
2019-2020
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1707 (#7) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1516 (#21) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +40.2 (#14) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.748 (#16) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.735 (#11) | NetEff +8.9 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.862 (#9) | AdjNet +15.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.863 (#9) | AdjNet +15.9 |
2020 Schedule & Results
2020 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cassius Winston
|
- | 22 | 33.2 | 18.9 | 2.6 | 6.0 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 3.2 | 14.0 | 11.5 | - | - | - | 45.3 | 44.4 | 83.2 | - | 59.2 | 54.4 |
X. Tillman
|
- | 23 | 32.9 | 14.2 | 10.4 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 9.6 | 20.1 | - | - | - | 56.1 | 30.6 | 68.4 | - | 61.7 | 58.6 |
Rocket Watts
|
- | 19 | 22.4 | 10.2 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 9.4 | 3.4 | - | - | - | 43.3 | 30.2 | 91.7 | - | 52.9 | 51.4 |
A. Henry
|
F | 23 | 29.2 | 9.9 | 4.8 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 8.8 | 8.3 | -44 | -3.7 | -7.0 | 42.1 | 34.7 | 73.3 | -0.8 | 51.4 | 48.3 |
G. Brown
|
F | 23 | 21.5 | 6.0 | 3.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 4.7 | 5.0 | - | - | - | 41.3 | 27.9 | 96.8 | - | 55.9 | 49.1 |
Malik Hall
|
- | 23 | 16.1 | 4.1 | 3.6 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 2.8 | 6.1 | 8 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 52.3 | 27.3 | 79.3 | 0.35 | 60.4 | 54.6 |
K. Ahrens
|
G | 19 | 12.8 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 2.9 | 2.6 | - | - | - | 34.5 | 34.1 | 80.0 | - | 51.9 | 47.3 |
F. Loyer
|
- | 23 | 7.9 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | -42 | -3.2 | -4.3 | 44.7 | 44.1 | 95.0 | -0.6 | 68.1 | 60.6 |
M. Bingham Jr.
|
F | 23 | 11.6 | 3.2 | 3.8 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 3.0 | 5.3 | 32 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 40.6 | 14.3 | 55.6 | 0.43 | 45.7 | 42.8 |
T. Kithier
|
F | 21 | 11.6 | 2.8 | 3.1 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 4.4 | - | - | - | 70.0 | 0 | 40.0 | - | 68.7 | 70.0 |
J. Marble
|
- | 19 | 5.7 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 66.7 | - | 53.6 | 50.0 |
C. George
|
G | 10 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 1.9 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 33.3 | 50.0 | - | 37.6 | 33.3 |
J. Hoiberg
|
G | 10 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 22.2 | 33.3 | 62.5 | - | 39.9 | 27.8 |
B. Washington
|
G | 7 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.3 | 0.1 | - | - | - | 22.2 | 20.0 | 100.0 | - | 35.4 | 27.8 |
B. Burke
|
C | 7 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Steven Izzo
|
- | 9 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG