Harvard Crimson
2011 Team Stats (7 games)
67.7
PPG
63.3
Opp
+7.3
Margin
44.4%
FG%
28.7%
3P%
82.9%
FT%
32.7
RPG
13.1
APG
15.3
TO
76.1
Pace
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1273 (#192) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1375 (#107) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +24.8 (#136) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.647 (#23) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.434 (#113) | NetEff -2.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.412 (#66) | AdjNet -3.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.408 (#66) | AdjNet -3.2 |
2011 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11-13 | @ | George Mason Patriots | L | 53 - 66 |
| 2010-11-17 | vs | Holy Cross Crusaders | W | 72 - 49 |
| 2010-11-20 | @ | Mercer Bears | W | 75 - 69 |
| 2010-11-24 | @ | Bryant Bulldogs | W | 69 - 66 |
| 2010-11-28 | vs | Colorado Buffaloes | W | 82 - 66 |
| 2010-12-01 | vs | Fordham Rams | W | 80 - 57 |
| 2010-12-04 | @ | Michigan Wolverines | L | 62 - 65 |
| 2010-12-07 | vs | Worcester Tech Engineers | W | 69 - 54 |
| 2010-12-11 | vs | Boston University Terriers | W | 87 - 71 |
| 2010-12-22 | @ | UConn Huskies | L | 52 - 81 |
| 2010-12-29 | vs | Monmouth Hawks | W | 74 - 69 |
| 2010-12-31 | vs | MIT Engineers | W | 84 - 58 |
| 2011-01-05 | @ | Boston College Eagles | W | 78 - 69 |
| 2011-01-08 | @ | Dartmouth Big Green | W | 68 - 53 |
| 2011-01-15 | @ | George Washington Colonials | W | 67 - 62 |
| 2011-01-22 | vs | Dartmouth Big Green | W | 59 - 50 |
| 2011-01-28 | vs | Columbia Lions | W | 77 - 66 |
| 2011-01-29 | vs | Cornell Big Red | W | 78 - 57 |
| 2011-02-04 | @ | Princeton Tigers | L | 61 - 65 |
| 2011-02-11 | vs | Yale Bulldogs | W | 78 - 75 |
| 2011-02-18 | @ | Cornell Big Red | W | 73 - 60 |
| 2011-02-19 | @ | Columbia Lions | W | 61 - 42 |
| 2011-02-25 | @ | Brown Bears | W | 74 - 68 |
| 2011-02-26 | @ | Yale Bulldogs | L | 69 - 70 |
| 2011-03-04 | vs | Pennsylvania Quakers | W | 79 - 64 |
| 2011-03-05 | vs | Princeton Tigers | W | 79 - 67 |
| 2011-03-12 | @ | Princeton Tigers | L | 62 - 63 |
| 2011-03-15 | @ | Oklahoma State Cowboys | L | 54 - 71 |
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K. Wright
|
F | 17 | 32.4 | 14.2 | 8.3 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 5.3 | 18.6 | - | - | - | 61.1 | 0 | 69.2 | - | 119.3 | 61.1 |
K. Casey
|
F | 16 | 29.3 | 11.8 | 6.8 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 4.4 | 15.4 | - | - | - | 45.7 | 0.0 | 81.8 | - | 118.6 | 45.7 |
C. Webster
|
G | 16 | 29.3 | 10.5 | 2.9 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 4.1 | 9.2 | - | - | - | 36.4 | 33.3 | 100.0 | - | 111.0 | 46.2 |
O. McNally
|
G | 17 | 33.8 | 10.1 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 2.9 | 12.3 | - | - | - | 46.0 | 37.5 | 86.4 | - | 124.0 | 55.0 |
L. Rivard
|
G | 17 | 24.6 | 9.6 | 2.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 4.5 | 8.1 | - | - | - | 37.7 | 37.0 | 87.5 | - | 93.7 | 50.6 |
B. Curry
|
G | 17 | 33.2 | 9.4 | 2.9 | 6.0 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 2.4 | 3.8 | 14.0 | - | - | - | 35.4 | 20.0 | 73.0 | - | 97.8 | 40.0 |
M. Brown
|
G | 15 | 10.1 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 6 | 6.0 | 44.0 | 50.0 | 36.4 | 33.3 | 0.45 | 88.1 | 64.3 |
J. Georgatos
|
F | 14 | 6.0 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.2 | - | - | - | 54.5 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 75.8 | 54.5 |
A. Van Nest
|
F | 11 | 7.0 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 0.4 | - | - | - | 16.7 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 16.7 | 16.7 |
E. Rouse
|
G | 5 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
D. Giger
|
G | 6 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | -0.3 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
U. Okam
|
C | 7 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
T. Hamel
|
- | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG