Cal Poly
2024 Team Stats (32 games)
63.7
PPG
74.1
Opp
-10.4
Margin
40.4%
FG%
33.1%
3P%
70.5%
FT%
31.3
RPG
9.8
APG
12.7
TO
76.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2023-2024
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 985 (#286) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 925 (#519) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +14.5 (#310) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.106 (#114) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.130 (#346) | NetEff -16.7 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.026 (#117) | AdjNet -31.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.026 (#117) | AdjNet -31.5 |
2024 Schedule & Results
2024 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kobe Sanders
|
- | 29 | 33.6 | 19.6 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 2.9 | 13.4 | 11.3 | - | - | - | 45.9 | 33.9 | 87.4 | - | 59.7 | 50.8 |
J. Hyder
|
- | 25 | 34.0 | 10.3 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 2.1 | 10.7 | 4.1 | - | - | - | 32.5 | 31.8 | 83.7 | - | 45.0 | 41.4 |
Q. Jones
|
- | 32 | 31.9 | 9.7 | 4.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 9.7 | 5.8 | - | - | - | 36.8 | 40.2 | 64.3 | - | 45.5 | 42.7 |
T. Jaakkola
|
- | 30 | 18.4 | 6.1 | 3.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 4.5 | 5.2 | - | - | - | 56.0 | 0 | 49.2 | - | 56.0 | 56.0 |
J. Page
|
G | 31 | 20.8 | 5.1 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 5.4 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 38.3 | 36.7 | 53.3 | - | 45.5 | 44.9 |
J. Armotrading
|
- | 30 | 19.5 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 3.1 | 7.7 | - | - | - | 54.3 | 0.0 | 59.0 | - | 58.0 | 54.3 |
A. Prukop
|
- | 17 | 13.2 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 4.4 | 1.6 | - | - | - | 33.8 | 39.5 | 85.7 | - | 47.4 | 45.3 |
P. Bizimana
|
- | 29 | 15.9 | 3.9 | 2.9 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 3.8 | 3.7 | - | - | - | 37.3 | 30.6 | 75.0 | - | 47.1 | 44.1 |
A. Price Jr.
|
- | 32 | 17.4 | 3.4 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 3.3 | 2.8 | 30 | 3.3 | 13.9 | 41.0 | 12.0 | 54.1 | 0.09 | 44.9 | 42.4 |
Cam Malray
|
- | 5 | 17.8 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 3.0 | 4.6 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 20.0 | 42.9 | - | 44.2 | 43.3 |
I. Spears
|
- | 19 | 12.6 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 3.1 | 1.1 | - | - | - | 28.8 | 21.9 | 30.8 | - | 34.8 | 34.7 |
H. Jory
|
- | 26 | 7.5 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 36.7 | 38.9 | 87.5 | - | 53.7 | 48.3 |
J. Mosley
|
- | 6 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 104.2 | 100.0 |
C. Haller
|
- | 16 | 4.8 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.5 | -0.2 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 30.0 | 0 | - | 31.2 | 31.2 |
N. Carlson
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
M. Dhal
|
C | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
E. Brown
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG