Boston College
2012 Team Stats (5 games)
53.8
PPG
68.9
Opp
-9.7
Margin
39.5%
FG%
35.7%
3P%
61.3%
FT%
25.0
RPG
10.4
APG
15.2
TO
69.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1313 (#159) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1362 (#111) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +25.9 (#125) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.105 (#109) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.045 (#212) | NetEff -25.2 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.115 (#106) | AdjNet -17.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.115 (#106) | AdjNet -17.8 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D. Anderson
|
F | 29 | 29.9 | 11.3 | 7.4 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 4.6 | 14.6 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 45.9 | 23.7 | 68.4 | 0.09 | 103.7 | 49.2 |
M. Humphrey
|
G | 29 | 30.5 | 10.5 | 3.3 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 4.3 | 10.8 | - | - | - | 35.5 | 30.4 | 56.8 | - | 108.4 | 44.0 |
D. Clifford
|
C | 29 | 26.7 | 8.8 | 4.7 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 3.3 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 54.6 | 25.0 | 70.5 | - | 109.1 | 55.2 |
P. Heckmann
|
G | 20 | 22.7 | 8.7 | 3.0 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 3.0 | 2.7 | 8.4 | - | - | - | 53.7 | 36.8 | 63.0 | - | 132.1 | 60.2 |
L. Jackson
|
G | 29 | 27.1 | 8.0 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 3.0 | 8.6 | - | - | - | 43.7 | 45.5 | 76.2 | 0.21 | 121.1 | 60.9 |
J. Daniels
|
G | 28 | 25.5 | 6.3 | 1.7 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 2.2 | 4.0 | 5.4 | - | - | - | 35.1 | 32.2 | 75.0 | - | 75.0 | 43.7 |
G. Moton
|
G | 27 | 15.5 | 3.0 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 4.1 | - | - | - | 43.8 | 40.0 | 40.0 | - | 118.4 | 53.1 |
J. Cahill Jr.
|
G | 25 | 15.0 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 3.7 | 34 | 5.7 | 3.8 | 45.5 | 42.1 | 83.3 | 1.26 | 121.8 | 63.6 |
K. Caudill
|
C | 26 | 10.0 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 47.6 | 0 | 60.0 | - | 118.1 | 47.6 |
D. Rubin
|
G | 16 | 7.6 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1.6 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 57.1 | 0 | - | 105.0 | 60.0 |
E. Odio
|
F | 18 | 7.2 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0.0 | 25.0 | - | 89.3 | 40.0 |
D. Visockas
|
G | 6 | 6.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 37.5 | 0.0 |
R. Kilcullen
|
F | 7 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 113.6 | 0 |
S. Abdo
|
G | 5 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | 0 |
P. Rehnquist
|
G-F | 8 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
J. Cain Carney
|
F | 9 | 2.4 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG