🐻⬇️🏀

BYU

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Also known as: BYU Cougars, BYU
Program History
Coach: Kevin Young

2013 Team Stats (3 games)

71.7
PPG
69.3
Opp
+8.0
Margin
39.8%
FG%
30.0%
3P%
73.2%
FT%
37.0
RPG
13.3
APG
11.3
TO
83.7
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1767 (#18) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1494 (#50) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 1085 (#63) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +35.5 (#36) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → +20.5 (#33) HCA +3.3
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.833 (#5) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -5.9 More → 0.337 (#133) NetEff -5.9
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +7.9 More → 0.712 (#41) AdjNet +7.9
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +7.8 More → 0.712 (#42) AdjNet +7.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 76.1 | AdjD 66.4 More → 0.707 (#27) AdjO 76.1 | AdjD 66.4
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.869 (#46) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.853 (#43) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 106 | GP 35 More → 1261 (#37) RD 106 | GP 35

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-11-09 vs Tennessee State Tigers W 81 - 66
2012-11-13 vs Georgia State Panthers W 80 - 62
2012-11-16 vs Florida State Seminoles L 70 - 88
2012-11-17 @ Notre Dame Fighting Irish L 68 - 78
2012-11-21 vs UTSA Roadrunners W 81 - 62
2012-11-24 vs Cal State Northridge Matadors W 87 - 75
2012-11-28 vs Montana Grizzlies W 85 - 60
2012-12-01 @ Iowa State Cyclones L 62 - 83
2012-12-08 vs Utah Utes W 61 - 58
2012-12-15 @ Weber State Wildcats W 78 - 68
2012-12-18 vs Eastern New Mexico Greyhounds W 95 - 62
2012-12-21 @ Baylor Bears L 64 - 79
2012-12-27 vs Northern Arizona Lumberjacks W 84 - 54
2012-12-29 vs Virginia Tech Hokies W 97 - 71
2013-01-03 vs Loyola Marymount Lions W 92 - 51
2013-01-05 @ San Francisco Dons W 80 - 76
2013-01-10 vs Pepperdine Waves W 76 - 51
2013-01-12 @ Santa Clara Broncos W 82 - 64
2013-01-16 vs Saint Mary's Gaels L 69 - 70
2013-01-19 vs San Diego Toreros W 74 - 57
2013-01-24 @ Gonzaga Bulldogs L 63 - 83
2013-01-26 @ Portland Pilots W 85 - 67
2013-01-31 @ Pepperdine Waves W 63 - 61
2013-02-02 vs Santa Clara Broncos W 96 - 79
2013-02-07 @ San Diego Toreros L 68 - 74
2013-02-09 vs San Francisco Dons L 87 - 99
2013-02-16 vs Portland Pilots W 86 - 72
2013-02-19 vs Utah State Aggies W 70 - 68
2013-02-21 @ Saint Mary's Gaels L 57 - 64
2013-02-28 vs Gonzaga Bulldogs L 65 - 70
2013-03-02 @ Loyola Marymount Lions W 73 - 70
2013-03-08 vs San Diego Toreros L 69 - 72
2013-03-19 vs Washington Huskies W 90 - 79
2013-03-25 vs Mercer Bears W 90 - 71
2013-03-27 @ Southern Miss Golden Eagles W 79 - 62

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
T. Haws T. Haws G 35 34.2 21.6 4.6 2.0 1.3 0.1 1.9 3.1 24.6 227 6.3 9.9 41.7 40.0 78.0 1.8 299.5 44.4
B. Davies B. Davies F 35 29.3 17.8 8.1 2.5 1.3 1.0 2.5 2.4 25.8 249 6.9 12.1 47.0 33.3 72.5 2.47 310.1 47.6
M. Carlino M. Carlino G 35 28.5 11.3 3.5 4.7 1.8 0.1 2.8 2.2 16.5 151 4.2 6.5 39.0 22.2 57.1 1.06 238.1 42.9
B. Zylstra B. Zylstra G 35 25.6 7.7 4.1 2.0 0.9 0.1 1.1 1.4 12.4 73 2.0 3.9 42.0 48.1 75.0 -0.12 237.6 55.0
J. Sharp J. Sharp F 32 18.5 4.4 3.9 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.7 8.2 92 2.9 6.8 71.4 0.0 55.6 0.34 280.4 71.4
C. Cusick C. Cusick G 35 19.4 3.9 2.3 2.1 0.8 0.0 0.9 0.9 7.4 115 3.2 6.8 31.2 38.1 75.0 0.54 183.7 43.8
N. Austin N. Austin F 35 16.9 3.5 4.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 8.4 75 2.1 4.3 52.4 20.0 45.5 0.68 236.1 54.8
A. Winder A. Winder G 31 8.1 2.1 1.0 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.5 3.4 29 0.9 3.1 35.7 14.3 60.0 0.31 197.5 39.3
A. Ambrosino A. Ambrosino F 30 6.4 1.9 1.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.1 3.2 110 3.4 10.2 25.0 0.0 0 0.9 700.0 25.0
C. Calvert C. Calvert G 27 7.4 1.9 0.9 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.6 0.2 2.8 56 2.0 7.7 33.3 0.0 0 0.59 425.0 33.3
R. Delgado R. Delgado G 25 6.8 1.9 1.0 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.2 3.3 13 0.5 2.3 20.0 25.0 0 -0.07 480.0 30.0
B. Kaufusi B. Kaufusi F 19 6.3 1.1 1.7 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 3.1 44 2.2 7.4 100.0 0 16.7 0.3 226.3 100.0
I. Harward I. Harward F 21 4.2 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.1 1.8 -63 -2.9 -12.4 0.0 0 100.0 -1.11 381.9 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG