Yale
2011 Team Stats (7 games)
70.3
PPG
67.6
Opp
+0.4
Margin
44.3%
FG%
29.4%
3P%
79.4%
FT%
35.0
RPG
11.4
APG
16.7
TO
79.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1529 (#68) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1370 (#109) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +24.9 (#131) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.305 (#87) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.312 (#146) | NetEff -6.9 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.137 (#104) | AdjNet -15.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.132 (#104) | AdjNet -16.2 |
2011 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11-13 | vs | Quinnipiac Bobcats | L | 75 - 84 |
| 2010-11-15 | @ | Providence Friars | L | 55 - 58 |
| 2010-11-18 | @ | Boston College Eagles | W | 75 - 67 |
| 2010-11-23 | @ | Illinois Fighting Illini | L | 47 - 73 |
| 2010-11-27 | vs | Army Black Knights | W | 87 - 79 |
| 2010-11-30 | vs | Hartford Hawks | W | 81 - 76 |
| 2010-12-04 | @ | Vermont Catamounts | L | 78 - 82 |
| 2010-12-06 | vs | Albany Great Danes | W | 74 - 53 |
| 2010-12-08 | @ | Bryant Bulldogs | W | 75 - 53 |
| 2010-12-19 | vs | Sacred Heart Pioneers | L | 62 - 71 |
| 2010-12-28 | @ | Stanford Cardinal | L | 44 - 60 |
| 2010-12-31 | vs | Lehigh Mountain Hawks | L | 57 - 62 |
| 2011-01-05 | @ | Holy Cross Crusaders | W | 77 - 76 |
| 2011-01-08 | vs | Baruch College Bearcats | W | 85 - 57 |
| 2011-01-15 | @ | Brown Bears | W | 69 - 64 |
| 2011-01-22 | vs | Brown Bears | W | 59 - 51 |
| 2011-01-28 | @ | Pennsylvania Quakers | L | 58 - 66 |
| 2011-01-29 | @ | Princeton Tigers | L | 63 - 67 |
| 2011-02-04 | vs | Cornell Big Red | W | 71 - 70 |
| 2011-02-11 | @ | Harvard Crimson | L | 75 - 78 |
| 2011-02-18 | vs | Princeton Tigers | L | 51 - 58 |
| 2011-02-19 | vs | Pennsylvania Quakers | L | 58 - 60 |
| 2011-02-25 | vs | Dartmouth Big Green | W | 79 - 75 |
| 2011-02-26 | vs | Harvard Crimson | W | 70 - 69 |
| 2011-03-04 | @ | Columbia Lions | W | 87 - 81 |
| 2011-03-05 | @ | Cornell Big Red | L | 55 - 68 |
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
G. Mangano
|
F | 14 | 32.9 | 17.6 | 10.0 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 6.9 | 23.1 | - | - | - | 52.6 | 42.3 | 77.1 | - | 109.9 | 58.2 |
A. Morgan
|
G | 14 | 30.5 | 11.0 | 2.0 | 2.9 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.9 | 9.9 | - | - | - | 36.2 | 35.1 | 89.5 | - | 89.8 | 45.7 |
P. Braswell
|
G | 14 | 30.6 | 10.2 | 3.6 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 4.6 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 43.1 | 30.8 | 74.4 | - | 85.2 | 49.2 |
R. Willhite
|
G-F | 14 | 29.3 | 8.8 | 4.5 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 4.0 | 12.9 | - | - | - | 39.3 | 14.3 | 75.0 | - | 94.9 | 41.1 |
J. Kreisberg
|
C | 14 | 27.4 | 8.4 | 4.6 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 3.6 | 9.3 | - | - | - | 64.0 | 0 | 68.4 | - | 101.1 | 64.0 |
B. Katz
|
G | 6 | 8.5 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 4.2 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 20.0 | 50.0 | - | 123.9 | 31.2 |
R. Anderson
|
F | 14 | 13.8 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 4.1 | - | - | - | 38.9 | 0.0 | 50.0 | - | 96.9 | 38.9 |
R. Mantilla
|
G | 5 | 12.0 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0.0 | 60.0 | - | 58.8 | 25.0 |
M. Grace
|
G | 12 | 8.2 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 106.6 | 20.0 |
S. Martin
|
G | 13 | 10.5 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.3 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 29.4 | 0.0 | 57.1 | - | 64.7 | 29.4 |
I. Salafia
|
G | 13 | 9.8 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 1.7 | - | - | - | 27.8 | 33.3 | 88.9 | - | 59.2 | 36.1 |
J. Pritchard
|
G | 13 | 6.5 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.9 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 92.9 | 42.9 |
W. Bartlett
|
F | 3 | 3.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
A. Costa
|
- | 2 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG