Wichita State Shockers
2013 Team Stats (14 games)
68.2
PPG
61.2
Opp
+8.5
Margin
43.2%
FG%
34.7%
3P%
70.1%
FT%
37.6
RPG
12.5
APG
12.4
TO
76.1
Pace
Model Outputs
2012-2013
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1301 (#165) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1442 (#74) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1226 (#4) | HCA +147 elo |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 996 (#307) | HCA +147 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +33.9 (#51) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +25.3 (#10) | HCA +3.3 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -24.8 (#570) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.734 (#19) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.814 (#32) | NetEff +12.4 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.764 (#34) | AdjNet +10.2 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.767 (#33) | AdjNet +10.3 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.773 (#7) | AdjO 71.7 | AdjD 58.2 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.455 (#414) | AdjO 64.4 | AdjD 66.4 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.928 (#11) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.110 (#570) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.918 (#11) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.160 (#568) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1347 (#11) | RD 90 | GP 39 |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 889 (#431) | RD 350 | GP 1 |
2013 Schedule & Results
2013 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C. Early
|
F | 39 | 25.1 | 13.9 | 5.4 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 4.9 | 15.1 | - | - | - | 47.2 | 31.5 | 79.5 | 2.17 | 119.7 | 53.1 |
C. Hall
|
F | 32 | 28.6 | 12.5 | 6.8 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 4.3 | 16.6 | 160 | 5.0 | 7.8 | 53.3 | 0 | 64.6 | 1.29 | 116.7 | 53.3 |
M. Armstead
|
G | 39 | 28.6 | 10.7 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 2.3 | 5.1 | 13.2 | 205 | 5.3 | 8.3 | 38.6 | 33.0 | 90.7 | 1.43 | 96.3 | 46.4 |
R. Baker
|
G | 18 | 26.1 | 8.7 | 3.2 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 10.2 | - | - | - | 44.1 | 38.1 | 82.1 | 1.46 | 110.1 | 57.6 |
D. Williams
|
G | 39 | 24.9 | 7.4 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 9.0 | 102 | 2.6 | 4.4 | 38.1 | 28.8 | 70.6 | 0.91 | 120.0 | 45.2 |
T. Cotton
|
G | 39 | 23.7 | 6.5 | 3.9 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 9.5 | 176 | 4.5 | 8.3 | 41.7 | 34.5 | 59.1 | 1.53 | 103.0 | 46.6 |
E. Wessel
|
G | 8 | 19.0 | 5.5 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 7.8 | 50 | 6.2 | 19.7 | 44.4 | 28.6 | 100.0 | 0.54 | 233.1 | 55.6 |
N. Wiggins
|
G | 36 | 12.8 | 4.9 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 5.3 | 119 | 3.4 | 8.4 | 43.6 | 53.3 | 70.0 | 0.73 | 148.1 | 58.2 |
F. VanVleet
|
G | 39 | 16.2 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 2.3 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 6.4 | - | - | - | 34.3 | 40.0 | 81.0 | 0.75 | 105.4 | 41.4 |
J. White
|
F | 37 | 10.9 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 4.5 | 80 | 2.2 | 6.7 | 44.4 | 17.6 | 76.5 | 0.3 | 93.6 | 46.8 |
E. Orukpe
|
C | 36 | 15.1 | 2.6 | 4.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 6.6 | 102 | 2.8 | 8.1 | 51.2 | 0 | 25.0 | 0.56 | 94.9 | 51.2 |
C. Lufile
|
F | 29 | 8.1 | 1.7 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 3.3 | 84 | 2.9 | 10.6 | 60.0 | 0 | 25.0 | 0.6 | 143.2 | 60.0 |
D. Green
|
F | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | 273 | 8.3 | 12.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 2.32 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG