Vermont Catamounts
2026 Team Stats (35 games)
Model Outputs
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1193 (#86) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1179 (#75) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 1113 (#50) | HCA +106 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +6.5 (#101) | HCA +2.4 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +10.1 (#73) | HCA +2.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.874 (#39) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More โ | 0.874 (#39) | NetEff +15.4 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.786 (#98) | AdjNet +11.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.788 (#99) | AdjNet +11.3 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.655 (#95) | AdjO 62.2 | AdjD 55.1 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.697 (#55) | AdjO 62.2 | AdjD 53.0 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.738 (#80) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.746 (#76) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1207 (#56) | RD 112 | GP 33 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nikola Priede
|
C | 35 | 34.2 | 17.4 | 7.5 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 12.9 | 14.9 | 230 | 29 | 7.9 | 9.2 | 59.9 | 0.0 | 66.0 | 1.51 | 61.3 | 59.9 |
Keira Hanson
|
G | 35 | 34.7 | 14.3 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 12.4 | 6.0 | 251 | 29 | 8.7 | 9.9 | 45.2 | 42.7 | 76.8 | 2.77 | 54.7 | 52.9 |
Jadyn Weltz
|
G | 35 | 31.5 | 11.6 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 11.0 | 7.7 | 253 | 29 | 8.7 | 11.1 | 37.1 | 34.0 | 84.5 | 3.28 | 48.2 | 43.6 |
Malia Lenz
|
G | 35 | 32.2 | 7.5 | 7.4 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 6.2 | 10.2 | 254 | 29 | 8.8 | 10.9 | 45.2 | 31.8 | 55.6 | 2.87 | 54.2 | 53.2 |
Christiana Gordon
|
G | 2 | 5.0 | 6.5 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 6.5 | - | - | - | - | 83.3 | 100.0 | 50.0 | - | 94.5 | 100.0 |
Catherine Gilwee
|
G | 10 | 29.7 | 5.7 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 6.5 | 1.5 | 8 | 8 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 36.9 | 9.1 | 87.5 | -3.01 | 41.6 | 38.5 |
Emma Haan
|
G | 35 | 28.6 | 5.5 | 3.7 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 5.3 | 5.1 | 136 | 29 | 4.7 | 6.7 | 34.2 | 28.9 | 78.8 | -3.13 | 47.9 | 44.7 |
Savanna Creal
|
F | 33 | 9.8 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 2.7 | 17 | 27 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 55.9 | 0 | 80.0 | -2.55 | 61.4 | 55.9 |
Jacklynn Hosier
|
G | 34 | 14.6 | 2.6 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 66 | 28 | 2.4 | 6.5 | 36.7 | 35.5 | 81.8 | -1.88 | 49.1 | 43.7 |
Annemarie Batista
|
F | 3 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 1.3 | - | - | - | - | 60.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -1.69 | 60.0 | 60.0 |
Piper Risdon
|
F | 18 | 4.8 | 1.7 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 1.3 | -32 | 14 | -2.3 | -22.1 | 40.0 | 28.6 | 54.5 | -5.07 | 50.3 | 48.0 |
Lia Hanson
|
G | 20 | 5.5 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 0.6 | -41 | 15 | -2.7 | -26.0 | 33.3 | 37.5 | 0 | -5.8 | 41.0 | 41.0 |
Devon Yarde
|
G | 11 | 2.8 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.5 | -3 | 7 | -0.4 | -7.6 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -1.55 | 42.0 | 33.3 |
Maren Maxon
|
G | 12 | 3.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.3 | -7 | 9 | -0.8 | -12.3 | 14.3 | 0.0 | 0 | -1.22 | 14.3 | 14.3 |
Madison Hall
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG
2025-2026 Shot Zones
1962 located field-goal attempts in 35 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).
Nikola PriedeKeira HansonJadyn WeltzMalia LenzEmma Haan
| Zone | FGM-FGA | FG% | Pts | Top scorer | Runner-up | Most misses | Runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted area | 266-441 | 60.3 | 532 | Nikola Priede 39% (206 pts) | Malia Lenz 15% (78 pts) | Jadyn Weltz 31% (55 misses) | Nikola Priede 25% (43 misses) |
| Paint (non-RA) | 297-597 | 49.7 | 594 | Nikola Priede 48% (288 pts) | Keira Hanson 20% (118 pts) | Nikola Priede 37% (110 misses) | Keira Hanson 21% (64 misses) |
| Mid-range left | 36-90 | 40.0 | 72 | Keira Hanson 36% (26 pts) | Jadyn Weltz 19% (14 pts) | Keira Hanson 33% (18 misses) | Jadyn Weltz 28% (15 misses) |
| Mid-range center | 20-48 | 41.7 | 40 | Jadyn Weltz 55% (22 pts) | Keira Hanson 25% (10 pts) | Jadyn Weltz 43% (12 misses) | Keira Hanson 32% (9 misses) |
| Mid-range right | 63-156 | 40.4 | 126 | Keira Hanson 48% (60 pts) | Nikola Priede 24% (30 pts) | Keira Hanson 38% (35 misses) | Jadyn Weltz 22% (20 misses) |
| Left corner 3 | 21-54 | 38.9 | 63 | Emma Haan 33% (21 pts) | Keira Hanson 24% (15 pts) | Malia Lenz 30% (10 misses) | Emma Haan 21% (7 misses) |
| Right corner 3 | 16-46 | 34.8 | 48 | Emma Haan 44% (21 pts) | Keira Hanson 38% (18 pts) | Emma Haan 27% (8 misses) | Jadyn Weltz 20% (6 misses) |
| Above-break 3 left | 72-219 | 32.9 | 216 | Keira Hanson 36% (78 pts) | Jadyn Weltz 29% (63 pts) | Emma Haan 25% (37 misses) | Keira Hanson 22% (32 misses) |
| Above-break 3 center | 35-99 | 35.4 | 105 | Jadyn Weltz 31% (33 pts) | Malia Lenz 26% (27 pts) | Jadyn Weltz 28% (18 misses) | Keira Hanson 19% (12 misses) |
| Above-break 3 right | 64-212 | 30.2 | 192 | Keira Hanson 30% (57 pts) | Jadyn Weltz 27% (51 pts) | Jadyn Weltz 26% (39 misses) | Keira Hanson 23% (34 misses) |