UCLA
2012 Team Stats (1 games)
58.0
PPG
61.5
Opp
+7.3
Margin
40.7%
FG%
13.3%
3P%
66.7%
FT%
35.0
RPG
12.0
APG
10.0
TO
74.3
Pace
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1583 (#49) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1580 (#23) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +36.0 (#28) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.861 (#4) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.120 (#164) | NetEff -16.9 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.870 (#13) | AdjNet +16.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.875 (#13) | AdjNet +16.7 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L. Jones
|
G | 30 | 33.3 | 13.5 | 3.5 | 4.4 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 17.3 | -16 | -1.8 | -1.8 | 36.7 | 32.4 | 75.8 | 0.91 | 164.3 | 42.2 |
T. Wear
|
F | 27 | 26.2 | 11.7 | 5.8 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 3.0 | 15.8 | - | - | - | 56.8 | 0.0 | 89.3 | - | 169.3 | 56.8 |
D. Wear
|
F | 29 | 28.4 | 10.2 | 6.5 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.3 | 2.9 | 14.2 | - | - | - | 49.4 | 38.5 | 71.4 | - | 156.5 | 52.4 |
T. Lamb
|
G | 30 | 31.4 | 9.5 | 3.6 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 13.4 | - | - | - | 43.7 | 45.2 | 76.0 | - | 173.2 | 53.5 |
J. Smith
|
C | 29 | 16.6 | 9.5 | 4.7 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 12.8 | 7 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 66.7 | 0 | 56.7 | 1.2 | 264.4 | 66.7 |
J. Anderson
|
G | 29 | 32.9 | 8.5 | 3.2 | 4.3 | 1.8 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 14.2 | - | - | - | 35.5 | 31.2 | 68.8 | 0.77 | 178.9 | 39.5 |
R. Nelson
|
F | 6 | 19.3 | 5.7 | 4.5 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 4.2 | 7.8 | - | - | - | 44.0 | 42.9 | 50.0 | - | 63.5 | 50.0 |
N. Powell
|
G | 30 | 17.8 | 4.7 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 6.9 | - | - | - | 34.9 | 30.0 | 100.0 | - | 156.0 | 41.9 |
B. Lane
|
F | 16 | 7.6 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 3.5 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 225.3 | 33.3 |
K. Jones
|
- | 7 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.4 | -12 | -2.0 | -1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.93 | 0 | 0 |
D. Parker
|
G | 1 | 14.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 63 | 4.5 | 5.2 | 0 | 0 | 50.0 | 1.03 | 56.8 | 0 |
D. Brown
|
G | 7 | 2.7 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 61 | 10.2 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1.44 | 100.0 | 0.0 |
A. Stover
|
C | 26 | 8.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 2.9 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 67.4 | 42.9 |
M. DeMarcus
|
G | 5 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.8 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
T. Trapani
|
G | 6 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
N. Kazemi
|
G | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG