UC Irvine
2011 Team Stats (3 games)
65.7
PPG
75.5
Opp
+0.7
Margin
41.7%
FG%
37.9%
3P%
73.6%
FT%
29.3
RPG
10.7
APG
14.0
TO
76.1
Pace
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1467 (#92) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1263 (#167) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +24.8 (#134) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.405 (#72) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.336 (#138) | NetEff -5.7 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.173 (#97) | AdjNet -13.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.170 (#97) | AdjNet -13.8 |
2011 Schedule & Results
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E. Wise
|
F | 12 | 32.8 | 19.1 | 9.2 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 24.8 | -4 | -4.0 | -26.9 | 53.5 | 20.0 | 56.2 | 0.51 | 228.8 | 54.7 |
D. Moore
|
G | 15 | 31.1 | 16.6 | 5.1 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 2.3 | 3.2 | 19.5 | -24 | -24.0 | -151.2 | 45.8 | 47.8 | 81.8 | 0.35 | 199.1 | 57.3 |
P. Rembert
|
G | 15 | 33.9 | 11.3 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 14.0 | -2 | -2.0 | -10.6 | 35.7 | 40.0 | 77.8 | 0.72 | 183.9 | 42.9 |
M. Wilder
|
G-F | 15 | 28.9 | 8.7 | 5.3 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 1.6 | 14.1 | -6 | -6.0 | -960.0 | 37.5 | 43.8 | 100.0 | -1.21 | 222.0 | 52.1 |
P. Losonsky
|
F | 13 | 18.8 | 6.2 | 3.5 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 7.2 | -3 | -3.0 | -27.0 | 40.6 | 23.1 | 100.0 | 0.23 | 116.9 | 45.3 |
D. Starring
|
G | 15 | 24.7 | 6.1 | 3.2 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 8.8 | -27 | -27.0 | -191.2 | 38.1 | 28.6 | 85.7 | 0.36 | 189.0 | 42.9 |
C. McNealy
|
G | 14 | 20.6 | 4.8 | 3.0 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 7.5 | 18 | 18.0 | 220.4 | 45.5 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 0.04 | 138.4 | 54.5 |
D. Strings
|
G | 11 | 11.4 | 4.0 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 3.9 | 2 | 2.0 | 50.5 | 37.5 | 38.5 | 0 | -0.76 | 137.5 | 53.1 |
D. Flowers
|
G | 15 | 6.9 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.1 | - | - | - | 12.5 | 0.0 | 75.0 | - | 107.6 | 12.5 |
P. Simek
|
C | 14 | 7.6 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 2.6 | -4 | -4.0 | -72.7 | 50.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | -0.43 | 145.3 | 50.0 |
E. Kim
|
G | 13 | 8.4 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.9 | -5 | -5.0 | -67.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.14 | 91.7 | 0.0 |
A. Folker
|
C | 1 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG