🐻⬇️🏀

UC Davis

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Also known as: UC Davis Aggies
Program History
Coach: Jim Les

2022 Team Stats (3 games)

60.3
PPG
66.2
Opp
+1.2
Margin
36.8%
FG%
25.0%
3P%
71.9%
FT%
35.0
RPG
9.0
APG
11.3
TO
76.7
Pace

Model Outputs

2021-2022
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1212 (#122) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1171 (#176) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +115 elo More → 976 (#507) HCA +115 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.7 More → +21.2 (#205) HCA +2.7
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.4 More → +6.6 (#258) HCA +2.4
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.765 (#14) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -9.8 More → 0.231 (#209) NetEff -9.8
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -6.6 More → 0.318 (#85) AdjNet -6.6
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -6.8 More → 0.314 (#86) AdjNet -6.8
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 65.5 | AdjD 65.9 More → 0.491 (#263) AdjO 65.5 | AdjD 65.9
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.633 (#241) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.601 (#244) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 143 | GP 23 More → 982 (#233) RD 143 | GP 23

2022 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2021-11-09 @ Utah State Aggies W 72 - 69
2021-11-12 vs Eastern Washington Eagles W 84 - 76
2021-11-17 @ Pepperdine Waves L 67 - 72
2021-11-23 @ Sacramento State Hornets L 63 - 75
2021-11-28 vs Academy Of Art University Academy Of Art L 60 - 79
2021-12-01 vs Pacific Tigers W 63 - 57
2021-12-04 vs California Merced Bobcats W 81 - 40
2021-12-14 @ Oregon State Beavers W 71 - 64
2021-12-19 @ Pacific Tigers W 77 - 67
2021-12-22 vs Portland Pilots L 60 - 65
2022-01-15 @ Cal Poly Mustangs L 74 - 82
2022-01-20 @ Cal State Northridge Matadors W 64 - 47
2022-01-27 vs Cal State Fullerton Titans L 58 - 74
2022-01-29 vs Long Beach State Beach L 63 - 70
2022-02-01 @ UC Riverside Highlanders W 65 - 60
2022-02-05 vs Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors W 68 - 65
2022-02-19 vs Cal State Bakersfield Roadrunners W 81 - 79
2022-02-24 vs UC Santa Barbara Gauchos L 69 - 76
2022-02-26 vs Cal State Northridge Matadors W 68 - 49
2022-03-03 @ Long Beach State Beach L 65 - 68
2022-03-05 @ Cal State Fullerton Titans L 59 - 62
2022-03-08 vs Cal Poly Mustangs W 63 - 53
2022-03-10 @ Cal State Fullerton Titans L 55 - 73

2022 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
A. Sow A. Sow F 1 36.0 17.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 3.0 0.0 27.0 157 5.6 7.8 0 0 0 1.02 0 0
C. Fuller C. Fuller - 3 32.3 15.0 5.3 1.7 1.0 1.0 2.7 11.3 10.0 - - - 41.2 21.4 70.0 0.51 52.6 45.6
E. Pepper E. Pepper - 23 33.7 14.8 5.2 1.6 1.6 0.3 2.1 2.3 19.0 46 1.9 2.3 35.8 26.1 73.3 0.47 285.2 41.5
E. Manjon E. Manjon - 3 33.3 10.0 1.3 3.3 0.7 0.7 2.0 13.3 0.7 - - - 22.5 0.0 80.0 0.17 32.2 22.5
C. Anigwe C. Anigwe - 23 22.3 9.8 5.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 1.5 1.1 15.4 50 2.1 3.8 61.5 50.0 77.8 0.86 375.5 63.5
K. Milling K. Milling - 23 28.4 7.3 3.4 1.3 1.0 0.1 1.0 1.0 11.0 -1 -0.0 -0.1 45.8 30.0 0.0 0.17 343.7 52.1
C. Ba C. Ba G 4 17.5 5.0 0.5 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.5 -53 -4.4 -12.6 50.0 55.6 0 -0.99 83.3 70.8
Adebayo, Ade Adebayo, Ade - 23 17.9 2.1 2.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.9 0.1 5.1 - - - 50.0 0.0 0 - 1200.0 50.0
S. Touré S. Touré G 1 4.0 2.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 61 2.2 7.8 0 0 0 0.64 0 0
R. Idehen R. Idehen F 1 11.0 2.0 4.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 93 3.4 9.0 0 0 0 0.54 0 0
A. Murphy A. Murphy F 7 9.0 1.6 3.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 4.3 -3 -0.1 -0.4 25.0 0 0.0 -0.41 112.7 25.0
Leo Debruhl Leo Debruhl - 21 7.0 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.2 2.6 10 0.5 2.2 40.0 33.3 66.7 -0.06 221.5 50.0
F. Borra F. Borra - 18 7.1 1.1 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.8 0.0 1.7 -19 -1.1 -5.9 0 0 0 -0.34 0 0
B.J. Shaw B.J. Shaw G 1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
C. McGill C. McGill F 2 8.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 1.5 -9 -0.5 -2.1 0 0 0 -0.31 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG