TCU
2012 Team Stats (5 games)
85.6
PPG
88.6
Opp
-3.0
Margin
43.9%
FG%
39.7%
3P%
72.2%
FT%
35.2
RPG
13.8
APG
11.4
TO
-
Est. poss./game
72.6
Adj PPG
71.5
Adj Opp PPG
#155
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 1079 (#134) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 1063 (#129) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 978 (#199) | HCA +101 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | +1.4 (#152) | HCA +3.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | +0.0 (#169) | HCA +3.2 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.420 (#201) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.573 (#150) | AdjNet +2.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.575 (#149) | AdjNet +2.6 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.524 (#155) | AdjO 72.6 | AdjD 71.5 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.473 (#194) | AdjO 72.5 | AdjD 73.6 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.540 (#149) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.530 (#153) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 1085 (#116) | RD 106 | GP 30 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hank Thorns
|
G | 31 | 33.9 | 13.5 | 2.8 | 4.6 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 15.5 | -83 | 26 | -3.2 | -4.0 | 39.1 | 45.0 | 73.5 | 1.59 | 166.9 | 51.4 |
J.R. Cadot
|
G | 31 | 30.2 | 11.5 | 7.1 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 18.1 | -62 | 26 | -2.4 | -3.4 | 50.0 | 45.0 | 75.0 | 2.15 | 191.2 | 56.1 |
Garlon Green
|
G | 31 | 24.8 | 10.2 | 3.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 11.7 | -39 | 26 | -1.5 | -2.6 | 45.3 | 33.3 | 82.8 | 0.64 | 179.5 | 52.0 |
Amric Fields
|
F | 31 | 21.4 | 10.0 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 10.8 | -78 | 26 | -3.0 | -6.5 | 52.6 | 27.6 | 74.1 | -0.55 | 172.5 | 57.7 |
Kyan Anderson
|
G | 31 | 27.3 | 8.2 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 9.2 | -120 | 26 | -4.6 | -7.2 | 45.3 | 42.9 | 85.7 | -2.13 | 146.0 | 53.3 |
Craig Williams
|
F | 30 | 17.0 | 7.6 | 3.7 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 8.5 | 17 | 25 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 40.8 | 29.6 | 82.6 | 2.75 | 132.4 | 46.1 |
Adrick McKinney
|
F | 30 | 18.3 | 5.6 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 8.2 | -113 | 26 | -4.3 | -11.1 | 57.5 | 0 | 35.3 | -3.4 | 175.9 | 57.5 |
N. Butler Lind
|
G | 31 | 16.8 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 5.5 | -3 | 26 | -0.1 | -0.3 | 41.2 | 40.0 | 41.7 | 0.63 | 190.8 | 47.1 |
Connell Crossland
|
F | 30 | 11.3 | 2.3 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 5.3 | -20 | 25 | -0.8 | -3.0 | 47.4 | 40.0 | 75.0 | 0.31 | 166.2 | 52.6 |
Jarvis Ray
|
G | 12 | 7.4 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 2.4 | 0 | 7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 66.7 | 50.0 | 0 | -0.97 | 383.3 | 83.3 |
Thomas Montigel
|
G | 5 | 3.0 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 2.4 | - | - | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | -0.01 | 225.0 | 125.0 |
Chris Zurcher
|
G | 9 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 4 | 5 | 0.8 | 32.3 | 25.0 | 50.0 | 0 | -0.15 | 150.0 | 37.5 |
Cheick Kone
|
C | 8 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.9 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.16 | 60.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG