🐻⬇️🏀

Seattle Storm

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Also known as: Seattle Storm
Program History

2017 Team Stats (35 games)

82.2
PPG
82.5
Opp
-0.3
Margin
46.9%
FG%
36.1%
3P%
81.0%
FT%
31.0
RPG
19.9
APG
13.4
TO
79.0
Est. poss./game
80.8
Adj PPG
81.1
Adj Opp PPG
#7
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2017
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 935 (#8) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 950 (#8) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +63 elo More → 966 (#8) HCA +63 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.2 More → -0.3 (#7) HCA +3.2
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.4 More → +0.2 (#6) HCA +3.4
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.490 (#6) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -0.4 More → 0.488 (#7) AdjNet -0.4
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -0.4 More → 0.489 (#7) AdjNet -0.4
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 80.8 | AdjD 81.1 More → 0.493 (#7) AdjO 80.8 | AdjD 81.1
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 80.3 | AdjD 80.1 More → 0.505 (#6) AdjO 80.3 | AdjD 80.1
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.468 (#7) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.470 (#7) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 137 | GP 35 More → 943 (#8) RD 137 | GP 35

2017 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2017-05-13 @ Los Angeles Sparks L 68 - 78
2017-05-14 vs Indiana Fever W 87 - 82
2017-05-21 vs Washington Mystics W 81 - 71
2017-05-26 vs New York Liberty W 87 - 81
2017-05-28 vs Indiana Fever W 94 - 70
2017-06-03 vs Minnesota Lynx L 77 - 100
2017-06-06 @ San Antonio Stars W 85 - 76
2017-06-09 @ Indiana Fever L 80 - 83
2017-06-11 @ New York Liberty L 86 - 94
2017-06-13 vs Atlanta Dream L 86 - 91
2017-06-18 vs San Antonio Stars W 75 - 57
2017-06-23 vs Phoenix Mercury L 82 - 85
2017-06-27 @ Washington Mystics L 70 - 100
2017-06-29 @ Connecticut Sun L 89 - 96
2017-07-01 @ Dallas Wings W 89 - 69
2017-07-06 vs New York Liberty L 70 - 79
2017-07-08 vs Los Angeles Sparks W 81 - 69
2017-07-12 vs Connecticut Sun L 79 - 83
2017-07-15 vs Atlanta Dream W 90 - 84
2017-07-18 vs Chicago Sky L 83 - 94
2017-07-25 @ Los Angeles Sparks L 60 - 68
2017-07-28 vs Dallas Wings W 109 - 93
2017-07-30 @ Minnesota Lynx L 82 - 93
2017-08-04 @ Dallas Wings L 80 - 93
2017-08-05 @ San Antonio Stars L 80 - 87
2017-08-08 @ Connecticut Sun L 71 - 84
2017-08-12 @ Phoenix Mercury W 98 - 89
2017-08-16 vs Minnesota Lynx W 62 - 61
2017-08-18 vs San Antonio Stars W 79 - 78
2017-08-20 @ Chicago Sky W 103 - 66
2017-08-23 @ Atlanta Dream L 83 - 89
2017-08-27 vs Phoenix Mercury L 71 - 75
2017-09-01 @ Washington Mystics L 106 - 110
2017-09-03 @ Chicago Sky W 85 - 80
2017-09-06 @ Phoenix Mercury L 69 - 79

2017 Roster

Minutes by Position

Each player's share of the team's minutes per game (season minutes over the roster's), placed by position, so every column is one game's minutes. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Breanna Stewart Breanna Stewart F 34 33.0 20.0 8.7 2.7 1.1 1.6 2.4 14.2 17.4 - - - - 47.1 37.5 78.9 - 58.5 52.4
Jewell Loyd Jewell Loyd G 37 30.5 17.5 3.2 3.2 1.4 0.3 2.5 14.0 9.1 - - - - 42.4 38.1 87.6 - 54.6 48.1
C. Langhorne C. Langhorne F 37 27.8 11.9 5.9 1.4 0.6 0.3 1.7 7.9 10.6 - - - - 64.0 50.0 73.9 - 66.5 64.2
E. Brand E. Brand - 31 30.0 10.5 2.0 6.6 1.2 0.1 2.1 9.1 9.2 - - - - 42.8 39.2 78.1 - 55.0 53.4
Alysha Clark Alysha Clark F 36 27.6 8.0 4.0 1.5 0.7 0.1 1.1 6.0 7.3 - - - - 51.2 31.5 77.2 - 59.8 56.5
J. O'Hea J. O'Hea G 2 23.0 5.0 3.5 3.5 1.5 0.5 1.0 4.0 9.0 - - - - 25.0 33.3 100.0 - 51.2 37.5
Sami Whitcomb Sami Whitcomb G 36 12.9 4.9 1.8 1.1 0.8 0.0 0.9 4.4 3.3 - - - - 36.9 33.6 81.8 - 52.2 49.7
K. Mosqueda-Lewis K. Mosqueda-Lewis F 19 11.1 4.5 1.3 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.8 3.8 1.9 - - - - 44.4 28.6 100.0 - 55.3 51.4
R. Tokashiki R. Tokashiki F 36 12.9 3.2 1.8 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.9 3.0 2.4 - - - - 43.9 0.0 78.6 - 48.6 43.9
C. Swords C. Swords C 33 9.4 3.1 1.7 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.9 2.2 2.5 - - - - 56.3 0 77.8 - 60.9 56.3
N. Quinn N. Quinn G 33 15.7 2.6 1.7 2.8 0.4 0.2 0.9 1.9 4.8 - - - - 41.3 38.5 95.2 - 60.2 53.2
J. O'Neill J. O'Neill G 2 21.0 2.5 2.5 3.0 0.5 1.0 0.5 3.5 5.5 - - - - 28.6 0.0 50.0 - 31.7 28.6
A. Peterson A. Peterson - 19 8.7 2.3 1.3 1.0 0.3 0.0 1.1 3.2 0.5 - - - - 27.9 16.7 75.0 - 33.3 30.3
L. Montgomery L. Montgomery C 9 6.0 1.7 1.3 0.0 0.1 0.6 0.3 1.4 1.9 - - - - 53.8 0 33.3 - 52.4 53.8

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2017 Shot Zones

2350 located field-goal attempts in 37 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Langhorne29% Stewart33% Loyd29% Loyd26% Loyd24% Loyd28% Clark33% Brand30% Brand32% Stewart25%
Points: who the team's points here most likely come from
Loyd30% Stewart27% Loyd28% Loyd28% Stewart27% Clark31% Loyd28% Brand25% Brand28% Whitcomb23%
Misses: who misses most here

Breanna StewartJewell LoydC. LanghorneE. BrandAlysha ClarkSami Whitcomb

Zone FGM-FGA FG% Pts Top scorer Runner-up Most misses Runner-up
Restricted area 467-729 64.1 934 C. Langhorne 29% (270 pts) Breanna Stewart 20% (190 pts) Jewell Loyd 30% (78 misses) Breanna Stewart 20% (52 misses)
Paint (non-RA) 154-349 44.1 308 Breanna Stewart 33% (102 pts) Jewell Loyd 16% (48 pts) Breanna Stewart 27% (52 misses) Jewell Loyd 21% (41 misses)
Mid-range left 96-226 42.5 192 Jewell Loyd 29% (56 pts) E. Brand 22% (42 pts) Jewell Loyd 28% (37 misses) E. Brand 21% (27 misses)
Mid-range center 42-110 38.2 84 Jewell Loyd 26% (22 pts) Breanna Stewart 21% (18 pts) Jewell Loyd 28% (19 misses) C. Langhorne 16% (11 misses)
Mid-range right 79-203 38.9 158 Jewell Loyd 24% (38 pts) E. Brand 22% (34 pts) Breanna Stewart 27% (33 misses) Jewell Loyd 22% (27 misses)
Left corner 3 29-61 47.5 87 Jewell Loyd 28% (24 pts) Alysha Clark 24% (21 pts) Alysha Clark 31% (10 misses) Jewell Loyd 25% (8 misses)
Right corner 3 12-30 40.0 36 Alysha Clark 33% (12 pts) Jewell Loyd 17% (6 pts) Jewell Loyd 28% (5 misses) Alysha Clark 17% (3 misses)
Above-break 3 left 91-264 34.5 273 E. Brand 30% (81 pts) Jewell Loyd 25% (69 pts) E. Brand 25% (43 misses) Jewell Loyd 23% (39 misses)
Above-break 3 center 44-125 35.2 132 E. Brand 32% (42 pts) Breanna Stewart 25% (33 pts) E. Brand 28% (23 misses) Breanna Stewart 21% (17 misses)
Above-break 3 right 83-253 32.8 249 Breanna Stewart 25% (63 pts) Sami Whitcomb 22% (54 pts) Sami Whitcomb 23% (39 misses) Breanna Stewart 19% (32 misses)