๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Purdue Boilermakers

Also known as: Purdue Boilermakers
Program History

2014 Team Stats (9 games)

71.3
PPG
79.4
Opp
-8.1
Margin
43.0%
FG%
29.7%
3P%
66.1%
FT%
37.6
RPG
13.3
APG
12.0
TO
-
Est. poss./game
75.1
Adj PPG
68.2
Adj Opp PPG
#74
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2013-2014
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 1009 (#168) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 1070 (#117) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +92 elo More โ†’ 923 (#278) HCA +92 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.8 More โ†’ +7.8 (#68) HCA +2.8
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.9 More โ†’ +7.2 (#76) HCA +2.9
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.524 (#157) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +11.3 More โ†’ 0.786 (#75) AdjNet +11.3
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +11.5 More โ†’ 0.791 (#74) AdjNet +11.5
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 75.1 | AdjD 68.2 More โ†’ 0.653 (#74) AdjO 75.1 | AdjD 68.2
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 71.7 | AdjD 69.6 More โ†’ 0.548 (#117) AdjO 71.7 | AdjD 69.6
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.623 (#108) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.602 (#112) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 132 | GP 32 More โ†’ 1062 (#126) RD 132 | GP 32

2014 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2013-11-08 vs Northern Kentucky Norse W 77 - 76
2013-11-13 vs Central Connecticut Blue Devils W 109 - 73
2013-11-17 vs Rider Broncs W 81 - 77
2013-11-20 vs Eastern Illinois Panthers W 83 - 55
2013-11-24 vs Siena Saints W 81 - 73
2013-11-28 @ Oklahoma State Cowboys L 87 - 97
2013-11-29 @ Washington State Cougars L 54 - 69
2013-12-01 @ Siena Saints W 68 - 63
2013-12-04 vs Boston College Eagles W 88 - 67
2013-12-07 vs Eastern Michigan Eagles W 69 - 64
2013-12-14 @ Butler Bulldogs L 70 - 76
2013-12-17 vs Maryland Eastern Shore Hawks W 79 - 50
2013-12-22 @ West Virginia Mountaineers W 73 - 70
2013-12-31 vs Ohio State Buckeyes L 69 - 78
2014-01-05 @ Minnesota Golden Gophers L 79 - 82
2014-01-12 vs Nebraska Cornhuskers W 70 - 64
2014-01-15 @ Illinois Fighting Illini W 66 - 58
2014-01-18 vs Penn State Nittany Lions W 65 - 64
2014-01-21 @ Northwestern Wildcats L 60 - 63
2014-01-25 vs Wisconsin Badgers L 58 - 72
2014-01-30 @ Michigan Wolverines L 66 - 75
2014-02-02 @ Penn State Nittany Lions L 68 - 79
2014-02-05 vs Minnesota Golden Gophers W 77 - 74
2014-02-08 @ Ohio State Buckeyes L 49 - 67
2014-02-15 vs Indiana Hoosiers W 82 - 64
2014-02-20 vs Michigan State Spartans L 79 - 94
2014-02-23 @ Nebraska Cornhuskers L 57 - 76
2014-02-26 vs Michigan Wolverines L 76 - 77
2014-03-02 @ Iowa Hawkeyes L 76 - 83
2014-03-05 @ Wisconsin Badgers L 70 - 76
2014-03-09 vs Northwestern Wildcats L 65 - 74
2014-03-13 @ Ohio State Buckeyes L 61 - 63

2014 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Terone Johnson Terone Johnson G 28 30.5 11.5 3.6 2.4 0.7 0.1 1.3 5.8 11.2 -30 25 -1.2 -1.8 39.3 40.0 61.7 -1.46 87.7 45.4
A.J. Hammons A.J. Hammons C 28 25.8 11.0 7.7 0.5 0.4 3.0 2.6 3.8 16.3 40 24 1.7 2.9 52.4 0.0 71.4 3.52 116.0 52.4
Ronnie Johnson Ronnie Johnson G 28 28.4 10.6 2.8 3.8 0.5 0.0 2.2 5.2 10.3 65 25 2.6 4.0 44.8 29.0 59.7 4.04 86.2 47.9
Kendall Stephens Kendall Stephens G 28 20.9 8.4 1.8 0.8 0.5 0.3 0.7 4.2 6.9 64 25 2.6 5.3 32.5 34.1 84.2 3.74 93.7 44.9
Bryson Scott Bryson Scott G 28 15.4 5.9 2.5 1.2 0.9 0.1 1.5 3.0 6.2 -90 25 -3.6 -9.9 30.6 25.0 80.6 -4.2 81.8 31.8
Rapheal Davis Rapheal Davis G 28 18.9 5.8 3.6 1.3 0.4 0.2 0.8 2.3 8.2 -10 25 -0.4 -0.9 43.1 22.2 82.1 -0.23 98.0 46.2
Basil Smotherman Basil Smotherman F 28 19.2 5.0 3.9 0.7 0.5 0.1 0.5 2.1 7.7 11 25 0.4 1.0 55.2 0.0 66.7 -0.99 106.9 55.2
Errick Peck Errick Peck F 28 17.9 4.2 4.2 0.6 0.3 0.4 1.0 2.3 6.4 -63 25 -2.5 -6.0 47.7 33.3 55.6 -3.86 84.8 51.5
Sterling Carter Sterling Carter G 23 15.2 4.2 1.8 1.1 1.0 0.3 0.7 2.0 5.7 20 21 1.0 2.7 28.3 20.0 85.7 1.73 97.8 34.8
Jay Simpson Jay Simpson F 22 11.5 4.1 3.4 0.6 0.5 0.3 1.0 2.0 5.9 -1 20 -0.1 -0.2 48.8 0.0 45.0 0.37 87.8 48.8
Stephen Toyra Stephen Toyra G 6 4.0 1.7 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.5 1.5 5 7 0.7 9.2 66.7 0.0 0 -0.89 166.7 66.7
Travis Carroll Travis Carroll F 22 7.0 1.3 1.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.6 2.4 -33 20 -1.6 -10.2 35.7 0 0.0 -3.01 97.4 35.7
Anfernee Brown Anfernee Brown G 3 1.7 0.7 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
Neal Beshears Neal Beshears F 4 1.8 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
Jon McKeeman Jon McKeeman G 3 2.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 - - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG