Providence
2012 Team Stats (8 games)
66.5
PPG
69.7
Opp
-0.2
Margin
39.4%
FG%
33.8%
3P%
72.9%
FT%
38.4
RPG
14.0
APG
11.9
TO
79.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1407 (#110) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1421 (#85) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +31.0 (#72) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.582 (#44) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.462 (#75) | NetEff -1.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.577 (#57) | AdjNet +2.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.580 (#55) | AdjNet +2.8 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T. Wright
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 19.0 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 16.0 | 16.0 | - | - | - | 56.2 | 0 | 33.3 | - | 54.8 | 56.2 |
V. Council
|
C | 30 | 38.7 | 15.9 | 4.2 | 7.6 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 3.6 | 6.3 | 19.3 | - | - | - | 38.9 | 27.9 | 68.5 | - | 111.3 | 42.1 |
B. Cotton
|
G | 31 | 38.5 | 14.5 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 4.7 | 14.2 | - | - | - | 38.1 | 37.5 | 87.8 | - | 133.8 | 48.3 |
L. Henton
|
F | 31 | 37.1 | 14.5 | 8.6 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.7 | 5.3 | 19.4 | - | - | - | 43.6 | 37.0 | 69.6 | - | 119.9 | 48.8 |
G. Coleman
|
G | 29 | 34.6 | 13.6 | 5.1 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 2.3 | 4.6 | 15.2 | - | - | - | 35.3 | 25.0 | 67.7 | - | 121.6 | 36.5 |
A. Cropper
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 80.0 | 80.0 |
K. Batts
|
F | 20 | 19.3 | 6.1 | 4.0 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 3.4 | 6.6 | - | - | - | 44.1 | 0 | 73.8 | - | 70.5 | 44.1 |
L. Wells
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | -8 | -1.6 | -0.7 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 100.0 | 0.42 | 64.4 | 50.0 |
B. Dixon
|
F-C | 30 | 15.4 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 8.1 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 88.9 | - | 140.0 | 50.0 |
R. Barnes
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 31.1 | 33.3 |
L. Okafor
|
- | 1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 7.0 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 34.7 | 25.0 |
B. Kofane
|
F | 29 | 15.0 | 2.7 | 4.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 7.3 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0 | 55.2 | - | 135.6 | 50.0 |
M. Murray
|
G | 1 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
R. Giplaye
|
F | 25 | 7.7 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 3.4 | - | - | - | 57.1 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 110.9 | 57.1 |
M. Grant
|
- | 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
L. Goldsbrough
|
F | 22 | 7.8 | 0.8 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 2.5 | - | - | - | 80.0 | 0 | 80.0 | - | 125.0 | 80.0 |
C. Carter
|
G | 15 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 33.3 | 0 | 0.17 | 100.0 | 37.5 |
T. Bancroft
|
G | 9 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.4 | -0.2 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG