Princeton
2011 Team Stats (9 games)
70.8
PPG
63.6
Opp
+6.1
Margin
49.1%
FG%
38.5%
3P%
71.9%
FT%
33.6
RPG
14.7
APG
12.2
TO
72.9
Pace
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1320 (#158) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1425 (#80) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +26.6 (#111) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.705 (#17) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.727 (#48) | NetEff +8.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.429 (#64) | AdjNet -2.5 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.429 (#64) | AdjNet -2.5 |
2011 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11-12 | vs | Rutgers Scarlet Knights | W | 78 - 73 |
| 2010-11-14 | @ | Duke Blue Devils | L | 60 - 97 |
| 2010-11-22 | @ | James Madison Dukes | L | 64 - 65 |
| 2010-11-23 | vs | Bucknell Bison | W | 66 - 55 |
| 2010-11-24 | @ | Presbyterian Blue Hose | L | 67 - 69 |
| 2010-11-28 | vs | Siena Saints | W | 86 - 77 |
| 2010-11-30 | @ | Lafayette Leopards | W | 82 - 64 |
| 2010-12-05 | vs | Saint Joseph's Hawks | W | 74 - 65 |
| 2010-12-08 | @ | Monmouth Hawks | W | 64 - 61 |
| 2010-12-12 | @ | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | W | 82 - 78 |
| 2010-12-17 | @ | Wagner Seahawks | W | 69 - 57 |
| 2010-12-22 | @ | Towson Tigers | W | 75 - 65 |
| 2010-12-29 | vs | Northeastern Huskies | W | 65 - 63 |
| 2010-12-30 | @ | UCF Knights | L | 62 - 68 |
| 2011-01-05 | vs | Marist Red Foxes | W | 68 - 57 |
| 2011-01-23 | vs | College of New Jersey Lions | W | 73 - 40 |
| 2011-01-28 | vs | Brown Bears | W | 78 - 60 |
| 2011-01-29 | vs | Yale Bulldogs | W | 67 - 63 |
| 2011-02-04 | vs | Harvard Crimson | W | 65 - 61 |
| 2011-02-08 | vs | Pennsylvania Quakers | W | 62 - 59 |
| 2011-02-11 | @ | Columbia Lions | W | 76 - 46 |
| 2011-02-18 | @ | Yale Bulldogs | W | 58 - 51 |
| 2011-02-19 | @ | Brown Bears | L | 65 - 75 |
| 2011-02-25 | vs | Cornell Big Red | W | 84 - 66 |
| 2011-02-26 | vs | Columbia Lions | W | 66 - 61 |
| 2011-03-04 | @ | Dartmouth Big Green | W | 77 - 55 |
| 2011-03-05 | @ | Harvard Crimson | L | 67 - 79 |
| 2011-03-08 | @ | Pennsylvania Quakers | W | 70 - 58 |
| 2011-03-12 | vs | Harvard Crimson | W | 63 - 62 |
| 2011-03-17 | @ | Kentucky Wildcats | L | 57 - 59 |
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I. Hummer
|
C | 17 | 29.9 | 14.2 | 6.8 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 2.5 | 5.9 | 16.3 | - | - | - | 63.4 | 0 | 66.0 | - | 99.4 | 63.4 |
D. Mavraides
|
G | 17 | 33.2 | 13.4 | 4.3 | 3.1 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 2.9 | 6.5 | 12.5 | - | - | - | 45.5 | 48.3 | 83.9 | - | 91.8 | 58.2 |
K. Maddox
|
F | 17 | 30.9 | 13.3 | 6.9 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 4.5 | 18.6 | - | - | - | 57.9 | 0.0 | 78.8 | - | 124.8 | 57.9 |
D. Davis
|
G | 17 | 31.6 | 11.1 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 6.1 | 7.9 | - | - | - | 39.8 | 34.0 | 94.1 | - | 85.5 | 48.1 |
M. Darrow
|
C | 16 | 17.2 | 4.2 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 1.8 | 6.1 | - | - | - | 41.4 | 36.4 | 83.3 | - | 97.7 | 48.3 |
P. Saunders
|
F | 16 | 19.5 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 5.4 | - | - | - | 35.7 | 28.6 | 50.0 | - | 93.0 | 42.9 |
B. Connolly
|
C | 16 | 14.2 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 4.8 | - | - | - | 44.8 | 0 | 66.7 | - | 77.4 | 44.8 |
W. Barrett
|
F | 11 | 12.8 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 5.3 | - | - | - | 38.5 | 33.3 | 70.0 | - | 97.7 | 46.2 |
J. Comfort
|
F | 5 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 2.2 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 33.3 | - | 104.2 | 66.7 |
T.J. Bray
|
G | 17 | 10.1 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 2.9 | - | - | - | 46.7 | 40.0 | 100.0 | - | 94.5 | 53.3 |
B. Foley
|
G | 8 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 60.0 | 0 | - | 120.0 | 90.0 |
B. Hazel
|
G | 12 | 7.0 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 2.4 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 62.5 | - | 99.7 | 0.0 |
D. Edwards
|
F | 4 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 25.8 | 33.3 |
T. Noonan
|
F | 3 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
J. Sherburne
|
G | 9 | 2.7 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | - | - | - | 20.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 20.0 | 20.0 |
C. Clement
|
G | 4 | 4.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG