🐻⬇️🏀

New York Liberty

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Also known as: New York Liberty
Program History

2026 Team Stats (2 games)

85.0
PPG
83.9
Opp
+3.3
Margin
42.3%
FG%
34.1%
3P%
88.5%
FT%
33.5
RPG
18.5
APG
16.0
TO
92.4
Pace

Model Outputs

2025 latest available
Catalog

No materialized model snapshot for 2026 yet, so this section is showing the latest available team-model rows.

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1018 (#9) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1077 (#6) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +45 elo More → 1006 (#7) HCA +45 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.6 More → +8.2 (#7) HCA +2.6
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.7 More → +3.6 (#9) HCA +2.7
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.643 (#6) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +4.3 More → 0.643 (#6) NetEff +4.3
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +8.6 More → 0.770 (#6) AdjNet +8.6
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +8.8 More → 0.776 (#6) AdjNet +8.8
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 86.1 | AdjD 79.6 More → 0.645 (#7) AdjO 86.1 | AdjD 79.6
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 79.8 | AdjD 79.2 More → 0.514 (#9) AdjO 79.8 | AdjD 79.2
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.617 (#7) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.591 (#8) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 109 | GP 49 More → 1045 (#7) RD 109 | GP 49

2026 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2026-04-25 vs Indiana Fever L 91 - 109
2026-05-03 @ Connecticut Sun W 79 - 67
2026-05-08 vs Connecticut Sun W 106 - 75
2026-05-10 @ Washington Mystics W 98 - 93
2026-05-12 @ Portland Fire L 96 - 98
2026-05-14 @ Portland Fire W 100 - 82
2026-05-21 vs Golden State Valkyries L 70 - 87
2026-05-24 vs Dallas Wings L 76 - 91
2026-05-25 vs Portland Fire L 74 - 81
2026-05-27 vs Phoenix Mercury W 84 - 74
2026-05-29 vs Phoenix Mercury W 75 - 68
2026-06-03 vs Toronto Tempo W 97 - 82
2026-06-06 vs Indiana Fever - Preview

2026 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
A. Maley A. Maley - 2 27.0 13.0 6.5 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 8.0 10.5 - - - 43.8 33.3 100.0 - 62.4 46.9
Marine Johannès Marine Johannès G 1 29.0 12.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 0.0 1.0 11.0 13.0 - - - 36.4 44.4 0 - 54.5 54.5
H. Xu H. Xu C 2 18.5 12.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 9.5 6.5 - - - 42.1 20.0 100.0 - 54.3 44.7
P. Astier P. Astier G 1 22.0 12.0 1.0 4.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 5.0 12.0 - - - 80.0 0 100.0 - 88.8 80.0
Breanna Stewart Breanna Stewart F 2 15.0 10.0 5.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 6.5 9.0 - - - 61.5 66.7 100.0 - 72.0 69.2
D. Erdogan D. Erdogan - 2 16.0 10.0 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 1.5 7.5 2.5 - - - 53.3 40.0 100.0 - 63.0 60.0
Jazmine Jones Jazmine Jones C 2 17.0 9.5 5.5 1.0 0.5 2.0 1.0 5.0 12.5 - - - 60.0 50.0 100.0 - 80.8 75.0
Rebekah Gardner Rebekah Gardner G 2 22.0 8.5 4.0 1.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 4.0 10.0 - - - 50.0 33.3 100.0 - 73.8 56.2
A. Fowler A. Fowler - 2 19.0 4.0 3.5 0.5 2.5 0.0 1.5 5.5 3.5 - - - 27.3 0.0 33.3 - 29.3 27.3
S. Ionescu S. Ionescu G 2 15.5 3.5 1.5 3.0 0.5 0.0 2.5 5.0 1.0 - - - 20.0 0.0 75.0 - 29.8 20.0
B. Laney-Hamilton B. Laney-Hamilton F 1 12.0 2.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 4.0 -3.0 - - - 25.0 0.0 0 - 25.0 25.0
A. Owusu A. Owusu - 1 13.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 2.0 - - - 0.0 0 100.0 - 20.5 0.0
N. Pryor N. Pryor - 1 24.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 4.0 0.0 3.0 4.0 6.0 - - - 0.0 0 50.0 - 10.2 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG