New Hampshire Wildcats

Season: 2027 preview 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017

Also known as: New Hampshire Wildcats

Program History

2026 Team Stats (30 games)

55.8

PPG

60.1

Opp

-4.2

Margin

39.1%

FG%

28.2%

3P%

74.5%

FT%

33.1

RPG

9.8

APG

15.4

66.0

Est. poss./game

54.6

Adj PPG

64.2

Adj Opp PPG

#276

Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2025-2026

Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model	Output	Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More →	734 (#304)	-
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More →	820 (#292)	-
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +106 elo More →	908 (#284)	HCA +106 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.4 More →	-10.8 (#279)	HCA +2.4
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.6 More →	-7.4 (#252)	HCA +2.6
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More →	0.181 (#286)	-
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -11.7 More →	0.181 (#286)	NetEff -11.7
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -18.1 More →	0.110 (#293)	AdjNet -18.1
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -18.3 More →	0.106 (#293)	AdjNet -18.3
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 54.6 \| AdjD 64.2 More →	0.294 (#276)	AdjO 54.6 \| AdjD 64.2
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 55.6 \| AdjD 60.6 More →	0.388 (#252)	AdjO 55.6 \| AdjD 60.6
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More →	0.241 (#286)	Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More →	0.257 (#286)	Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 156 \| GP 28 More →	842 (#284)	RD 156 \| GP 28

2026 Schedule & Results

Date	Vs/At	Opponent	Result	Score
2025-11-03	vs	Worcester State Lancers	W	72 - 32
2025-11-06	@	Boston College Eagles	L	57 - 69
2025-11-10	@	Colgate Raiders	L	79 - 89
2025-11-13	@	Green Bay Phoenix	L	64 - 76
2025-11-16	vs	New England College Pilgrims	W	76 - 29
2025-11-20	@	Army Black Knights	L	44 - 63
2025-11-25	@	Brown Bears	L	60 - 68
2025-11-30	@	Holy Cross Crusaders	L	45 - 64
2025-12-05	vs	Merrimack Warriors	W	65 - 61
2025-12-07	@	Louisville Cardinals	L	43 - 94
2025-12-17	@	Central Connecticut Blue Devils	W	69 - 66
2025-12-20	vs	Dartmouth Big Green	W	74 - 38
2025-12-28	vs	New Haven Chargers	W	64 - 59
2026-01-01	@	Bryant Bulldogs	L	31 - 45
2026-01-03	@	Vermont Catamounts	L	56 - 72
2026-01-08	vs	NJIT Highlanders	L	62 - 69
2026-01-10	vs	UMBC Retrievers	L	47 - 58
2026-01-17	vs	Maine Black Bears	L	51 - 73
2026-01-22	@	Binghamton Bearcats	L	42 - 50
2026-01-24	@	UAlbany Great Danes	W	56 - 51
2026-01-29	@	UMass Lowell River Hawks	W	62 - 58
2026-01-31	vs	Bryant Bulldogs	L	45 - 51
2026-02-07	vs	Vermont Catamounts	L	35 - 60
2026-02-12	@	NJIT Highlanders	L	47 - 55
2026-02-14	@	UMBC Retrievers	L	44 - 61
2026-02-19	vs	UMass Lowell River Hawks	L	54 - 57
2026-02-21	@	Maine Black Bears	L	61 - 67
2026-02-26	vs	Binghamton Bearcats	W	67 - 48
2026-02-28	vs	UAlbany Great Danes	W	45 - 42
2026-03-05	@	Maine Black Bears	L	58 - 77

2026 Roster

Show Alumni If everyone stayed four years

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player	Pos	GP	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	FGA	Numbers	PM	PM GP	PM/G	PM/40	FG%	3P%	FT%	RAPM	TS%	eFG%
Eva DeChent	G	30	32.8	18.1	5.5	2.1	1.9	0.7	3.7	14.4	10.2	-114	26	-4.4	-5.4	43.1	30.1	80.0	0.08	53.3	46.6
Maggie Cavanaugh	G	30	32.0	8.8	4.8	2.6	1.4	0.3	3.2	9.0	5.6	-147	26	-5.7	-7.3	34.7	26.1	79.3	-3.19	44.3	40.0
Elizabeth Lavoie	G	30	27.8	7.1	3.9	0.6	0.9	0.4	1.3	6.9	4.7	-53	26	-2.0	-3.0	37.0	31.6	70.0	2.18	47.0	44.2
Camryn Fauria	G	30	20.3	5.1	3.1	0.6	0.3	0.2	1.2	5.3	2.8	-63	26	-2.4	-4.9	36.7	26.5	92.3	0.72	45.1	40.8
L. Melero Sabat	F	30	20.5	5.0	3.7	0.8	0.3	0.4	1.2	5.0	4.0	-53	26	-2.0	-3.9	45.7	0.0	56.5	0.46	46.9	45.7
Katie Ledden	G	25	13.8	2.8	2.5	0.3	0.4	0.2	1.0	2.7	2.4	-73	20	-3.6	-11.1	41.8	24.0	61.5	-4.42	48.1	46.3
Averie Harding	F	20	6.8	2.5	1.7	0.1	0.1	0.2	0.5	2.2	1.9	-20	18	-1.1	-6.1	51.1	0	25.0	-2.3	48.0	51.1
Sydney Lusher	G	17	9.8	2.5	0.7	0.4	0.3	0.1	0.4	2.1	1.5	35	15	2.3	9.5	40.0	43.3	33.3	3.71	57.8	58.6
Carolina Williams	G	30	17.2	2.4	1.2	0.9	0.4	0.0	1.0	2.5	1.5	-71	26	-2.7	-6.9	30.7	25.7	78.3	-3.45	42.9	36.7
Alia Cordone	F	22	9.3	1.8	1.6	0.4	0.3	0.2	0.5	2.3	1.4	-29	20	-1.4	-6.5	30.0	8.3	75.0	-1.56	36.2	31.0
Kassidy Thompson	G	17	6.5	1.6	1.2	0.2	0.2	0.0	0.4	1.1	1.8	45	14	3.2	21.1	50.0	37.5	66.7	2.47	61.5	58.3
Kenzie Matulonis	G	30	17.6	1.4	1.6	1.2	1.2	0.2	0.8	1.8	3.0	-114	26	-4.4	-10.1	29.6	20.6	66.7	-5.44	38.0	36.1
Jamie Kent	F	10	4.3	0.8	1.0	0.2	0.1	0.0	0.3	1.0	0.8	7	8	0.9	8.6	40.0	0	0	-0.87	40.0	40.0
Diana Eliasson	G	0	-	0.0	0.0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Sophia Sabino	G	0	-	0.0	0.0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG

2025-2026 Shot Zones

1573 located field-goal attempts in 30 games (ESPN). Each zone is coloured by the player with the largest share of the team's made-shot points there (left) and of its misses there (right).

Points: who the team's points here most likely come from

Misses: who misses most here

Eva DeChentMaggie CavanaughElizabeth Lavoie

Zone	FGM-FGA	FG%	Pts	Top scorer	Runner-up	Most misses	Runner-up
Restricted area	154-284	54.2	308	Eva DeChent 35% (108 pts)	L. Melero Sabat 16% (48 pts)	Eva DeChent 33% (43 misses)	Elizabeth Lavoie 15% (20 misses)
Paint (non-RA)	274-628	43.6	548	Eva DeChent 33% (182 pts)	L. Melero Sabat 15% (82 pts)	Eva DeChent 27% (94 misses)	L. Melero Sabat 16% (57 misses)
Mid-range left	16-56	28.6	32	Eva DeChent 44% (14 pts)	Maggie Cavanaugh 25% (8 pts)	Eva DeChent 38% (15 misses)	Maggie Cavanaugh 25% (10 misses)
Mid-range center	9-35	25.7	18	Maggie Cavanaugh 44% (8 pts)	Eva DeChent 22% (4 pts)	Maggie Cavanaugh 38% (10 misses)	Eva DeChent 23% (6 misses)
Mid-range right	21-66	31.8	42	Maggie Cavanaugh 62% (26 pts)	Camryn Fauria 14% (6 pts)	Eva DeChent 36% (16 misses)	Maggie Cavanaugh 27% (12 misses)
Left corner 3	22-57	38.6	66	Elizabeth Lavoie 27% (18 pts)	Carolina Williams 14% (9 pts)	Maggie Cavanaugh 20% (7 misses)	Carolina Williams 17% (6 misses)
Right corner 3	18-43	41.9	54	Elizabeth Lavoie 44% (24 pts)	Camryn Fauria 17% (9 pts)	Elizabeth Lavoie 36% (9 misses)	Kenzie Matulonis 16% (4 misses)
Above-break 3 left	50-178	28.1	150	Eva DeChent 34% (51 pts)	Maggie Cavanaugh 26% (39 pts)	Eva DeChent 29% (37 misses)	Maggie Cavanaugh 23% (29 misses)
Above-break 3 center	20-89	22.5	60	Eva DeChent 30% (18 pts)	Camryn Fauria 25% (15 pts)	Maggie Cavanaugh 26% (18 misses)	Eva DeChent 16% (11 misses)
Above-break 3 right	32-137	23.4	96	Elizabeth Lavoie 22% (21 pts)	Eva DeChent 22% (21 pts)	Maggie Cavanaugh 23% (24 misses)	Elizabeth Lavoie 20% (21 misses)