🐻⬇️🏀

Missouri

Also known as: Missouri Tigers, Missouri
Program History

2013 Team Stats (21 games)

76.2
PPG
66.7
Opp
+9.4
Margin
45.3%
FG%
33.8%
3P%
76.8%
FT%
40.3
RPG
13.7
APG
12.6
TO
81.2
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1496 (#75) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1452 (#71) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 1045 (#110) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +31.8 (#71) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → +22.5 (#27) HCA +3.3
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.717 (#21) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +12.7 More → 0.809 (#34) NetEff +12.7
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +12.7 More → 0.813 (#20) AdjNet +12.7
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +13.0 More → 0.818 (#20) AdjNet +13.0
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 73.7 | AdjD 63.2 More → 0.721 (#23) AdjO 73.7 | AdjD 63.2
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.889 (#33) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.869 (#33) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 111 | GP 34 More → 1200 (#65) RD 111 | GP 34

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-11-10 vs SIU Edwardsville Cougars W 83 - 69
2012-11-13 vs Alcorn State Braves W 91 - 54
2012-11-16 vs Nicholls Colonels W 74 - 54
2012-11-22 vs Stanford Cardinal W 78 - 70
2012-11-23 @ Louisville Cardinals L 61 - 84
2012-11-24 vs VCU Rams W 68 - 65
2012-12-01 vs Appalachian State Mountaineers W 72 - 56
2012-12-04 vs Southeast Missouri State Redhawks W 81 - 65
2012-12-08 vs Tennessee State Tigers W 68 - 38
2012-12-17 vs South Carolina State Bulldogs W 102 - 51
2012-12-22 @ Illinois Fighting Illini W 82 - 73
2012-12-28 @ UCLA Bruins L 94 - 97
2013-01-05 vs Bucknell Bison W 66 - 64
2013-01-08 vs Alabama Crimson Tide W 84 - 68
2013-01-12 @ Ole Miss Rebels L 49 - 64
2013-01-16 vs Georgia Bulldogs W 79 - 62
2013-01-19 @ Florida Gators L 52 - 83
2013-01-22 vs South Carolina Gamecocks W 71 - 65
2013-01-26 vs Vanderbilt Commodores W 81 - 59
2013-01-30 @ LSU Tigers L 70 - 73
2013-02-02 vs Auburn Tigers W 91 - 77
2013-02-07 @ Texas A&M Aggies L 68 - 70
2013-02-09 vs Ole Miss Rebels W 98 - 79
2013-02-13 @ Mississippi State Bulldogs W 78 - 36
2013-02-16 @ Arkansas Razorbacks L 71 - 73
2013-02-19 vs Florida Gators W 63 - 60
2013-02-23 @ Kentucky Wildcats L 83 - 90
2013-02-28 @ South Carolina Gamecocks W 90 - 68
2013-03-02 vs LSU Tigers W 89 - 76
2013-03-05 vs Arkansas Razorbacks W 93 - 63
2013-03-09 @ Tennessee Volunteers L 62 - 64
2013-03-14 vs Texas A&M Aggies W 62 - 50
2013-03-15 @ Ole Miss Rebels L 62 - 64
2013-03-21 @ Colorado State Rams L 72 - 84

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
L. Bowers L. Bowers F 29 27.1 14.1 6.1 1.1 0.6 1.2 1.3 6.6 15.2 101 3.5 5.9 56.5 38.7 73.8 0.61 97.9 59.7
J. Brown J. Brown G 25 32.7 13.7 3.4 1.4 0.7 0.0 1.7 7.3 10.2 141 5.6 7.6 37.9 36.4 82.6 1.27 80.5 49.7
P. Pressey P. Pressey G 34 33.9 11.9 3.3 7.1 1.8 0.1 3.5 7.6 13.0 - - - 36.0 28.1 76.6 1.53 70.4 41.3
A. Oriakhi A. Oriakhi F 34 25.8 11.2 8.4 0.4 0.6 1.6 1.4 4.0 16.8 182 5.4 9.8 62.2 0 75.6 1.53 109.4 62.2
K. Bell K. Bell G 32 25.3 10.7 4.2 1.6 1.2 0.1 1.8 4.5 11.6 179 5.6 8.9 53.8 29.2 84.6 1.11 103.4 56.3
E. Ross E. Ross G 34 25.3 10.3 5.0 1.1 1.2 0.2 1.9 5.5 10.5 179 5.3 7.9 40.1 39.1 73.0 0.91 81.5 49.2
T. Criswell T. Criswell F 31 18.8 5.2 4.8 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.8 3.1 7.3 150 4.7 8.3 44.2 30.0 60.7 0.7 74.5 45.8
S. Jankovic S. Jankovic F 25 7.9 3.0 1.4 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.3 1.9 3.2 18 0.7 2.6 36.2 31.0 92.9 -0.34 71.5 45.7
N. Webster-Chan N. Webster-Chan G 31 16.0 2.6 2.0 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.7 1.5 3.5 173 5.6 11.2 33.3 29.0 80.0 0.94 79.7 42.7
R. Rosburg R. Rosburg F 31 6.9 1.0 1.3 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.6 2.0 54 1.7 7.2 44.4 0 62.5 0.11 69.7 44.4
D. Feldmann D. Feldmann F 12 2.2 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.2 - - - 75.0 0.0 0 - 75.0 75.0
C. Haith C. Haith G 10 1.8 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.7 26 2.4 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.09 51.2 0.0
D. Bull D. Bull G 9 1.6 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 - - - 0.0 0 0 - 50.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG