Missouri
2013 Team Stats (21 games)
76.2
PPG
66.7
Opp
+9.4
Margin
45.3%
FG%
33.8%
3P%
76.8%
FT%
40.3
RPG
13.7
APG
12.6
TO
81.2
Pace
Model Outputs
2012-2013
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1496 (#75) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1452 (#71) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1045 (#110) | HCA +147 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +31.8 (#71) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +22.5 (#27) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.717 (#21) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.809 (#34) | NetEff +12.7 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.813 (#20) | AdjNet +12.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.818 (#20) | AdjNet +13.0 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.721 (#23) | AdjO 73.7 | AdjD 63.2 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.889 (#33) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.869 (#33) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1200 (#65) | RD 111 | GP 34 |
2013 Schedule & Results
2013 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L. Bowers
|
F | 29 | 27.1 | 14.1 | 6.1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 6.6 | 15.2 | 101 | 3.5 | 5.9 | 56.5 | 38.7 | 73.8 | 0.61 | 97.9 | 59.7 |
J. Brown
|
G | 25 | 32.7 | 13.7 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 7.3 | 10.2 | 141 | 5.6 | 7.6 | 37.9 | 36.4 | 82.6 | 1.27 | 80.5 | 49.7 |
P. Pressey
|
G | 34 | 33.9 | 11.9 | 3.3 | 7.1 | 1.8 | 0.1 | 3.5 | 7.6 | 13.0 | - | - | - | 36.0 | 28.1 | 76.6 | 1.53 | 70.4 | 41.3 |
A. Oriakhi
|
F | 34 | 25.8 | 11.2 | 8.4 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 4.0 | 16.8 | 182 | 5.4 | 9.8 | 62.2 | 0 | 75.6 | 1.53 | 109.4 | 62.2 |
K. Bell
|
G | 32 | 25.3 | 10.7 | 4.2 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 4.5 | 11.6 | 179 | 5.6 | 8.9 | 53.8 | 29.2 | 84.6 | 1.11 | 103.4 | 56.3 |
E. Ross
|
G | 34 | 25.3 | 10.3 | 5.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 5.5 | 10.5 | 179 | 5.3 | 7.9 | 40.1 | 39.1 | 73.0 | 0.91 | 81.5 | 49.2 |
T. Criswell
|
F | 31 | 18.8 | 5.2 | 4.8 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 3.1 | 7.3 | 150 | 4.7 | 8.3 | 44.2 | 30.0 | 60.7 | 0.7 | 74.5 | 45.8 |
S. Jankovic
|
F | 25 | 7.9 | 3.0 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 3.2 | 18 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 36.2 | 31.0 | 92.9 | -0.34 | 71.5 | 45.7 |
N. Webster-Chan
|
G | 31 | 16.0 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 173 | 5.6 | 11.2 | 33.3 | 29.0 | 80.0 | 0.94 | 79.7 | 42.7 |
R. Rosburg
|
F | 31 | 6.9 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 54 | 1.7 | 7.2 | 44.4 | 0 | 62.5 | 0.11 | 69.7 | 44.4 |
D. Feldmann
|
F | 12 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 75.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 75.0 | 75.0 |
C. Haith
|
G | 10 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 26 | 2.4 | 7.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.09 | 51.2 | 0.0 |
D. Bull
|
G | 9 | 1.6 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG