🐻⬇️🏀

Fairleigh Dickinson

Also known as: Fairleigh Dickinson Knights
Program History

2013 Team Stats (1 games)

82.0
PPG
79.0
Opp
-13.4
Margin
51.9%
FG%
64.7%
3P%
73.9%
FT%
31.0
RPG
19.0
APG
14.0
TO
76.1
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 980 (#466) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1022 (#353) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 810 (#586) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +12.3 (#383) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → -10.7 (#472) HCA +3.3
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff +2.9 More → 0.571 (#82) NetEff +2.9
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 61.7 | AdjD 75.1 More → 0.229 (#590) AdjO 61.7 | AdjD 75.1
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.225 (#504) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.209 (#545) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 171 | GP 31 More → 750 (#579) RD 171 | GP 31

2013 Schedule & Results

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
K. Rochford K. Rochford F 27 29.0 14.7 8.9 2.0 0.7 1.3 2.7 3.0 21.9 -88 -3.3 -5.3 47.5 0 68.8 0.22 210.5 47.5
M. Bolding M. Bolding G 31 33.8 13.5 4.4 1.7 1.1 0.3 2.3 3.4 15.3 -320 -10.3 -13.4 38.5 33.3 75.0 -1.69 164.7 45.7
L. Robinson L. Robinson G 31 30.6 8.6 3.2 1.9 0.5 0.2 1.9 2.1 10.5 -189 -6.3 -8.9 38.5 34.4 54.2 -0.17 177.3 46.9
Y. Jules Y. Jules G 13 17.7 8.5 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.1 1.9 1.2 7.6 -107 -7.6 -16.3 26.7 0.0 80.0 -0.79 319.8 26.7
M. Seilund M. Seilund F 28 19.2 5.9 2.4 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.7 1.5 7.9 -179 -6.2 -12.0 48.8 42.1 100.0 -0.81 172.3 58.5
S. Harris S. Harris G 22 16.9 5.5 1.5 2.4 0.4 0.3 2.6 1.3 6.1 -134 -6.1 -13.5 34.5 20.0 75.0 0.13 187.6 36.2
M. Jones M. Jones G 31 21.8 5.3 1.8 1.1 0.9 0.1 1.2 1.5 6.5 -31 -1.0 -1.9 36.2 35.0 100.0 0.65 163.3 51.1
T. Charles T. Charles F 10 8.7 5.0 1.9 0.1 0.0 0.9 1.3 0.8 5.8 -48 -4.8 -19.6 87.5 0 0.0 -0.45 296.2 87.5
S. Sanders Jr. S. Sanders Jr. G 27 23.5 4.6 1.8 3.4 1.1 0.1 1.9 1.7 7.4 -37 -4.1 -14.2 40.4 30.8 54.2 -0.65 106.8 44.7
X. Harris X. Harris F 29 16.6 4.1 3.3 0.4 0.2 0.4 1.4 1.1 5.9 -222 -7.7 -16.6 46.9 0 66.7 -1.85 164.1 46.9
K. Pearson K. Pearson - 21 10.8 3.5 1.1 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.6 1.0 3.6 -169 -7.7 -23.9 38.1 25.0 50.0 -1.38 166.8 42.9
D. Moody D. Moody G 22 9.9 1.1 0.5 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.7 0.4 1.5 -168 -7.3 -21.4 55.6 57.1 0 -1.51 138.9 77.8
Y. Cordero-Collado Y. Cordero-Collado - 4 2.2 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.8 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
T. Charles T. Charles - 1 8.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 -48 -4.8 -19.6 0 0 0 -0.45 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG