Cal Poly
2017 Team Stats (1 games)
55.0
PPG
66.0
Opp
-11.0
Margin
34.5%
FG%
31.8%
3P%
88.9%
FT%
31.0
RPG
7.0
APG
15.0
TO
77.0
Pace
Model Outputs
2016-2017
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1087 (#260) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1022 (#353) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +14.6 (#338) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.109 (#84) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.042 (#106) | AdjNet -27.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.041 (#106) | AdjNet -27.5 |
2017 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-09 | @ | UC Davis Aggies | L | 55 - 66 |
2017 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R. Shipley
|
G | 1 | 30.0 | 19.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 14.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 55.6 | 100.0 | - | 63.8 | 60.7 |
Z. Gordon
|
F | 1 | 27.0 | 9.0 | 12.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 20.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 65.4 | 66.7 |
L. Meikle
|
F | 1 | 22.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 58.3 | 58.3 |
V. Joseph
|
G | 1 | 29.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 11.0 | -3.0 | - | - | - | 18.2 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 28.4 | 18.2 |
D. Fields
|
G | 1 | 38.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 8.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 0 | 0 | - | 37.5 | 37.5 |
K. Toth
|
G | 1 | 22.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 35.7 | 35.7 |
H. Hollingsworth
|
F | 1 | 12.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 100.0 | - | 113.6 | 0 |
A. Abrams
|
F | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
T. John
|
G | 1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
J. Niziol
|
F | 1 | 18.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG