West Tex. A&M
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1046 (#112) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1213 (#34) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 992 (#331) | HCA +95 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +15.4 (#43) | HCA +2.8 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +8.8 (#176) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.770 (#174) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.929 (#180) | NetEff +25.6 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.887 (#150) | AdjNet +17.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.910 (#124) | AdjNet +19.9 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.805 (#116) | AdjO 86.0 | AdjD 70.4 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.623 (#125) | AdjO 84.6 | AdjD 79.1 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.633 (#207) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.628 (#203) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 961 (#262) | RD 150 | GP 5 |
2026 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-22 | @ | Eastern N.M. | L | 89 - 97 |
| 2026-01-29 | vs | UT Tyler | L | 85 - 91 |
| 2026-01-31 | vs | DBU | L | 84 - 86 |
| 2026-02-05 | @ | Cameron | W | 87 - 67 |
| 2026-02-07 | @ | Okla. Christian | W | 91 - 87 |
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fontaine Williams | - | 4 | 33.6 | 24.2 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 13.0 | 15.8 | 92 | 4.2 | 32.9 | 50.0 | 57.9 | 91.9 | 0.95 | 71.0 | 60.6 |
| Brock Mishak | - | 5 | 30.0 | 14.8 | 6.2 | 3.0 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 2.2 | 11.6 | 11.8 | 104 | 4.5 | 32.6 | 48.3 | 38.5 | 80.0 | 1.21 | 59.3 | 56.9 |
| James Parlow Jr | - | 5 | 25.7 | 13.0 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 8.0 | 11.2 | - | - | - | 52.5 | 57.1 | 86.4 | - | 65.4 | 57.5 |
| Camden Cowgill | - | 5 | 24.2 | 12.0 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 10.6 | 4.6 | 31 | 1.4 | 12.9 | 32.1 | 34.3 | 60.9 | -1.17 | 47.5 | 43.4 |
| Zach Brown | - | 5 | 27.9 | 10.4 | 5.4 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 7.8 | 7.2 | 6 | 0.3 | 2.6 | 46.2 | 39.3 | 62.5 | -3.78 | 61.1 | 60.3 |
| Kemper Jones | - | 5 | 16.1 | 7.4 | 3.6 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 5.2 | 6.2 | -7 | -0.3 | -3.7 | 53.8 | 28.6 | 62.5 | 0.74 | 62.7 | 61.5 |
| Jailyn Sledge | - | 5 | 24.8 | 6.0 | 5.6 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 4.2 | 7.8 | 76 | 3.5 | 27.5 | 42.9 | 37.5 | 64.3 | 2.37 | 55.2 | 50.0 |
| Nicholas Jett | - | 5 | 7.5 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 2.4 | -7 | -0.4 | -8.0 | 44.4 | 33.3 | 100.0 | -0.4 | 55.7 | 50.0 |
| Brendan Ballard | - | 4 | 9.3 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 38 | 1.7 | 31.2 | 57.1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.96 | 57.1 | 57.1 |
| TJ Brown | - | 4 | 10.9 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 2.0 | -8 | -0.4 | -10.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.42 | 34.7 | 0.0 |
| Dawson Heider | - | 2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -6 | -0.5 | -496.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.48 | 0 | 0 |
| Jaden Holt | - | 1 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7 | 0.5 | 99.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG