Utah State
2022 Team Stats (5 games)
70.6
PPG
66.4
Opp
+6.9
Margin
47.8%
FG%
34.2%
3P%
70.2%
FT%
35.2
RPG
17.0
APG
13.4
TO
74.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2021-2022
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1573 (#15) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1438 (#32) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 975 (#510) | HCA +115 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +35.8 (#38) | HCA +2.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +18.2 (#90) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.510 (#59) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.799 (#36) | NetEff +12.2 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.421 (#74) | AdjNet -2.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.423 (#73) | AdjNet -2.7 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.627 (#94) | AdjO 70.7 | AdjD 64.9 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.841 (#85) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.803 (#93) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1102 (#144) | RD 121 | GP 31 |
2022 Schedule & Results
2022 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B. Horvath
|
F | 6 | 31.8 | 16.3 | 8.5 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 2.5 | 11.7 | 14.3 | 209 | 6.1 | 7.9 | 54.3 | 35.0 | 71.4 | 1.2 | 61.8 | 59.3 |
J. Bean
|
F | 6 | 33.8 | 15.8 | 10.2 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 0.2 | 2.0 | 11.2 | 16.8 | 253 | 7.4 | 8.5 | 52.2 | 50.0 | 76.2 | 2.02 | 62.3 | 59.0 |
J. Overton
|
F | 1 | 29.0 | 10.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 188 | 5.7 | 7.8 | 30.0 | 0.0 | 57.1 | 1.32 | 38.2 | 30.0 |
S. Bairstow
|
- | 23 | 26.2 | 9.6 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 10.8 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 7.1 | 59.1 | 0.78 | 162.5 | 50.9 |
S. Ashworth
|
- | 30 | 27.8 | 8.9 | 2.6 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 13.0 | 123 | 3.7 | 5.6 | 35.7 | 35.0 | 85.0 | 0.47 | 206.8 | 48.2 |
B. Miller
|
G | 9 | 24.0 | 7.6 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.9 | 3.7 | 6.1 | 146 | 8.1 | 14.8 | 42.4 | 34.6 | 100.0 | 1.4 | 100.4 | 56.1 |
RJ Eytle-Rock
|
- | 28 | 23.3 | 7.6 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 9.4 | - | - | - | 43.2 | 43.5 | 80.0 | 0.63 | 219.0 | 54.5 |
Rylan Jones
|
G | 6 | 27.3 | 6.2 | 2.8 | 5.2 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 6.3 | 7.3 | 221 | 7.1 | 10.5 | 39.5 | 26.3 | 100.0 | 1.83 | 47.6 | 46.1 |
M. Shulga
|
G | 29 | 14.2 | 4.8 | 2.3 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 7.3 | 8 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 52.4 | 50.0 | 88.9 | -0.57 | 280.4 | 66.7 |
Z. Hamoda
|
- | 25 | 8.4 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 3.8 | -7 | -0.2 | -1.2 | 47.1 | 25.0 | 60.0 | -0.39 | 187.5 | 52.9 |
T. Dorius
|
- | 27 | 8.1 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 5.6 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0 | 60.0 | -0.26 | 463.4 | 33.3 |
I. Johnson
|
- | 1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | -3 | -0.2 | -1.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.41 | 0 | 0 |
S. Zapala
|
C | 19 | 5.7 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0 | 100.0 | -0.11 | 232.6 | 100.0 |
N. Thelissen
|
F | 3 | 1.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | -23 | -1.5 | -20.2 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | -0.31 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
C. Odom
|
- | 5 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 150.0 | 150.0 |
C. Gillis
|
- | 6 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 170.5 | 0 |
L. McChesney
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | -13 | -0.4 | -0.9 | - | - | - | 0.39 | - | - |
Karson Stastny
|
G | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
M. Kozak
|
F | 1 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6 | 0.4 | 2.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.0 | 0 | 0 |
T. Wagstaff
|
F | 2 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG