UCLA
2021 Team Stats (12 games)
74.1
PPG
70.4
Opp
+3.7
Margin
43.8%
FG%
34.5%
3P%
71.5%
FT%
35.5
RPG
13.0
APG
10.0
TO
78.9
Pace
Model Outputs
2020-2021
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1377 (#56) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1509 (#11) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +38.2 (#24) | HCA +2.7 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.576 (#32) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.506 (#33) | NetEff +0.2 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.854 (#10) | AdjNet +15.3 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.855 (#10) | AdjNet +15.4 |
2021 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-25 | @ | San Diego State Aztecs | L | 58 - 73 |
| 2020-11-27 | vs | Pepperdine Waves | W | 107 - 98 |
| 2020-11-30 | vs | Long Beach State Beach | - | Preview |
| 2020-12-23 | @ | Oregon Ducks | - | Preview |
| 2021-01-19 | @ | Oregon Ducks | - | Preview |
| 2021-01-21 | @ | California Golden Bears | W | 61 - 57 |
| 2021-01-23 | @ | Stanford Cardinal | L | 72 - 73 |
| 2021-01-28 | vs | Oregon Ducks | - | Preview |
| 2021-01-30 | vs | Oregon State Beavers | W | 57 - 52 |
| 2021-02-01 | vs | Oregon Ducks | - | Preview |
| 2021-03-11 | vs | Oregon State Beavers | L | 79 - 83 |
| 2021-03-18 | @ | Michigan State Spartans | W | 86 - 80 |
| 2021-03-20 | @ | BYU Cougars | W | 73 - 62 |
| 2021-03-22 | vs | Abilene Christian Wildcats | W | 67 - 47 |
| 2021-03-28 | @ | Alabama Crimson Tide | W | 88 - 78 |
| 2021-03-30 | @ | Michigan Wolverines | W | 51 - 49 |
| 2021-04-03 | @ | Gonzaga Bulldogs | L | 90 - 93 |
2021 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Johnny Juzang
|
- | 10 | 35.1 | 19.2 | 3.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 15.8 | 8.1 | - | - | - | 48.1 | 35.9 | 77.3 | - | 57.3 | 55.4 |
C. Smith
|
G | 2 | 39.0 | 18.0 | 6.0 | 4.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 12.0 | 14.5 | 9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 45.8 | 57.1 | 90.9 | 0.08 | 62.4 | 54.2 |
Jaime Jaquez Jr.
|
- | 12 | 39.4 | 13.7 | 6.8 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 10.2 | 12.8 | 74 | 6.2 | 8.2 | 44.7 | 34.1 | 66.1 | 0.48 | 55.0 | 50.8 |
T. Campbell
|
- | 12 | 35.1 | 10.8 | 1.6 | 4.8 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 9.7 | 6.8 | -40 | -2.5 | -3.4 | 39.7 | 22.9 | 82.9 | -0.2 | 49.1 | 43.1 |
C. Riley
|
F | 12 | 26.9 | 10.0 | 6.2 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 2.0 | 7.4 | 10.0 | - | - | - | 50.6 | 0.0 | 58.8 | - | 53.8 | 50.6 |
J. Bernard
|
- | 12 | 29.8 | 9.5 | 5.9 | 1.4 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 8.0 | 8.4 | - | - | - | 38.5 | 32.4 | 80.0 | - | 51.2 | 44.8 |
D. Singleton
|
- | 12 | 20.6 | 5.3 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 4.4 | 3.9 | - | - | - | 39.6 | 39.0 | 66.7 | - | 56.2 | 54.7 |
Josie Hill
|
F | 3 | 16.3 | 3.0 | 4.3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 6.0 | 40 | 3.3 | 4.6 | 50.0 | 0 | 100.0 | 0.38 | 53.3 | 50.0 |
Jake Kyman
|
- | 12 | 10.1 | 2.8 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 2.6 | 2.0 | - | - | - | 41.9 | 47.1 | 0.0 | - | 54.1 | 54.8 |
Jaylen Clark
|
- | 12 | 8.2 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 3.5 | 40 | 5.0 | 29.4 | 37.5 | 0.0 | 78.6 | 0.72 | 51.9 | 37.5 |
M. Etienne
|
- | 4 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 28.6 | 0 | 0 | - | 28.6 | 28.6 |
K. Nwuba
|
- | 8 | 6.4 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.9 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
R. Stong
|
- | 2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
L. Cremonesi
|
- | 2 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG