TCU
2012 Team Stats (5 games)
85.6
PPG
72.8
Opp
-0.1
Margin
43.9%
FG%
39.7%
3P%
72.2%
FT%
35.2
RPG
13.8
APG
11.4
TO
87.3
Pace
Model Outputs
2011-2012
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1404 (#114) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1476 (#66) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +29.4 (#90) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.303 (#85) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.402 (#86) | NetEff -3.8 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.265 (#90) | AdjNet -8.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.264 (#90) | AdjNet -8.9 |
2012 Schedule & Results
2012 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H. Thorns
|
G | 31 | 33.9 | 13.5 | 2.8 | 4.6 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 15.5 | - | - | - | 39.1 | 45.0 | 73.5 | - | 166.9 | 51.4 |
J.R. Cadot
|
G | 31 | 30.2 | 11.5 | 7.1 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.4 | 18.1 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 45.0 | 75.0 | - | 191.2 | 56.1 |
G. Green
|
G | 31 | 24.8 | 10.2 | 3.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 11.7 | - | - | - | 45.3 | 33.3 | 82.8 | - | 179.5 | 52.0 |
A. Fields
|
F | 31 | 21.4 | 10.0 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 10.8 | - | - | - | 52.6 | 27.6 | 74.1 | - | 172.5 | 57.7 |
K. Anderson
|
G | 31 | 27.3 | 8.2 | 1.5 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 9.2 | - | - | - | 45.3 | 42.9 | 85.7 | - | 146.0 | 53.3 |
C. Williams
|
F | 30 | 17.0 | 7.6 | 3.7 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 2.5 | 8.5 | 54 | 4.9 | 2.9 | 40.8 | 29.6 | 82.6 | 1.94 | 132.4 | 46.1 |
A. McKinney
|
F | 30 | 18.3 | 5.6 | 4.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 8.2 | - | - | - | 57.5 | 0 | 35.3 | - | 175.9 | 57.5 |
N. Butler Lind
|
G | 31 | 16.8 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 5.5 | - | - | - | 41.2 | 40.0 | 41.7 | - | 190.8 | 47.1 |
C. Crossland
|
F | 30 | 11.3 | 2.3 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 5.3 | - | - | - | 47.4 | 40.0 | 75.0 | - | 166.2 | 52.6 |
J. Ray
|
G | 12 | 7.4 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 2.4 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 50.0 | 0 | 0.89 | 383.3 | 83.3 |
T. Montigel
|
G | 5 | 3.0 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 2.4 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 225.0 | 125.0 |
C. Zurcher
|
G | 9 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.1 | - | - | - | 25.0 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 150.0 | 37.5 |
C. Kone
|
C | 8 | 2.5 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.9 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 60.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG