SMU
2017 Team Stats (13 games)
73.5
PPG
62.5
Opp
+11.0
Margin
47.2%
FG%
41.5%
3P%
69.5%
FT%
36.2
RPG
14.7
APG
9.8
TO
72.8
Pace
Model Outputs
2016-2017
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1474 (#60) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1367 (#98) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +33.2 (#63) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.850 (#4) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.771 (#11) | NetEff +11.3 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.847 (#23) | AdjNet +14.9 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.850 (#23) | AdjNet +15.0 |
2017 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-27 | @ | Memphis Tigers | W | 58 - 54 |
| 2017-01-12 | @ | Cincinnati Bearcats | L | 64 - 66 |
| 2017-02-09 | @ | Temple Owls | W | 66 - 50 |
| 2017-02-12 | vs | Cincinnati Bearcats | W | 60 - 51 |
| 2017-02-15 | vs | Tulane Green Wave | W | 80 - 75 |
| 2017-02-18 | @ | Houston Cougars | W | 76 - 66 |
| 2017-02-25 | @ | UConn Huskies | W | 69 - 61 |
| 2017-03-02 | vs | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | W | 93 - 70 |
| 2017-03-04 | vs | Memphis Tigers | W | 103 - 62 |
| 2017-03-10 | vs | East Carolina Pirates | W | 81 - 77 |
| 2017-03-11 | vs | UCF Knights | W | 70 - 59 |
| 2017-03-12 | vs | Cincinnati Bearcats | W | 71 - 56 |
| 2017-03-17 | vs | USC Trojans | L | 65 - 66 |
2017 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S. Ojeleye
|
F | 13 | 36.2 | 20.7 | 7.2 | 1.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 12.4 | 16.7 | - | - | - | 50.3 | 46.2 | 80.2 | - | 66.2 | 59.6 |
S. Brown
|
G | 13 | 34.4 | 16.5 | 6.4 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 11.5 | 13.5 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 45.0 | 82.6 | 0.49 | 63.1 | 59.0 |
Shake Milton
|
- | 13 | 36.4 | 11.1 | 3.6 | 4.8 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 2.0 | 9.0 | 9.9 | - | - | - | 41.0 | 40.6 | 62.5 | - | 54.9 | 53.0 |
B. Moore
|
F | 13 | 33.5 | 10.7 | 7.7 | 2.1 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 8.2 | 12.6 | - | - | - | 51.9 | 33.3 | 54.9 | 0.23 | 54.1 | 52.4 |
J. Foster
|
G | 13 | 32.1 | 10.2 | 5.5 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 7.1 | 10.6 | - | - | - | 52.2 | 40.7 | 62.5 | - | 60.2 | 58.2 |
B. Emelogu II
|
G | 13 | 19.3 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 3.8 | 2.9 | - | - | - | 30.0 | 32.1 | 33.3 | - | 38.9 | 39.0 |
J. Pyle
|
G | 2 | 3.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 83.3 | 83.3 |
D. McDowell
|
G | 7 | 7.6 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.4 | - | - | - | 37.5 | 0 | 25.0 | - | 35.9 | 37.5 |
J. Wilfong
|
G | 5 | 6.6 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 0.8 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 33.3 | 33.3 |
L. Kontopoulos
|
F | 4 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | -0.2 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG