🐻⬇️🏀

SIU Edwardsville

Also known as: SIU Edwardsville Cougars
Program History

2013 Team Stats (2 games)

67.5
PPG
67.7
Opp
-4.8
Margin
38.0%
FG%
46.3%
3P%
66.7%
FT%
36.5
RPG
10.0
APG
12.5
TO
80.9
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1136 (#257) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1098 (#314) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 901 (#551) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +16.5 (#315) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → -5.5 (#396) HCA +3.3
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -17.3 More → 0.124 (#209) NetEff -17.3
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 60.0 | AdjD 65.9 More → 0.369 (#547) AdjO 60.0 | AdjD 65.9
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.375 (#372) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.352 (#409) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 142 | GP 28 More → 850 (#500) RD 142 | GP 28

2013 Schedule & Results

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
J. Jones J. Jones F 20 31.9 16.1 5.3 0.9 1.2 0.3 2.4 2.0 19.6 166 5.5 17.3 46.3 55.0 16.7 0.93 370.1 59.8
K. Davis K. Davis G 27 35.6 11.7 2.7 3.6 1.1 0.1 2.3 2.3 14.6 -26 -2.4 -12.7 45.2 44.0 81.8 -0.37 237.1 54.0
M. Yelovich M. Yelovich F 22 27.0 11.6 5.9 1.4 0.9 0.4 1.9 1.7 16.5 -80 -3.6 -5.7 39.5 28.6 80.0 -0.45 300.7 42.1
M. Messer M. Messer G 27 28.7 8.9 4.4 1.6 0.6 0.1 1.6 0.9 13.1 -72 -2.7 -4.5 39.1 28.6 79.2 -0.34 356.1 43.5
M. Wiltz M. Wiltz G 8 25.4 8.2 2.0 3.0 0.5 0.0 2.0 3.0 8.8 -27 -3.4 -6.1 37.5 46.2 100.0 0.05 135.0 50.0
T. Johnson T. Johnson G 27 22.1 7.3 2.8 1.4 0.6 0.4 1.7 1.2 9.6 139 4.1 5.9 31.2 26.7 90.9 0.56 268.7 37.5
D. Shaffer D. Shaffer F 27 21.9 6.2 4.6 0.4 0.3 0.7 1.6 1.1 9.4 -119 -4.4 -9.0 38.7 0 38.5 -1.22 227.4 38.7
R. Lester R. Lester F 26 14.4 2.4 2.7 0.2 0.3 0.2 1.0 0.2 4.4 -80 -3.1 -7.7 50.0 0 42.9 -0.24 341.4 50.0
R. Reed R. Reed G 23 18.0 1.4 1.4 2.9 0.7 0.0 2.0 0.2 4.3 -51 -2.2 -4.5 25.0 0.0 100.0 -0.25 327.9 25.0
C. Joy C. Joy F 16 7.1 1.3 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.7 0.4 1.8 -32 -1.9 -6.3 42.9 100.0 50.0 -0.05 133.2 57.1
M. Birts M. Birts F 8 2.8 1.1 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.5 12 1.5 12.5 0.0 0 0 0.21 450.0 0.0
K. Heck K. Heck G 6 5.3 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.3 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
Z. Schneider Z. Schneider F-C 18 4.8 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.7 -18 -1.1 -5.8 0.0 0 0 -0.17 175.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG