Northeastern
2013 Team Stats (2 games)
57.0
PPG
68.3
Opp
+0.6
Margin
35.8%
FG%
35.3%
3P%
69.0%
FT%
30.0
RPG
13.0
APG
14.0
TO
73.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2012-2013
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1166 (#241) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1245 (#192) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 992 (#391) | HCA +147 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +20.5 (#218) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +6.4 (#205) | HCA +3.3 |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.145 (#196) | NetEff -15.0 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.487 (#263) | AdjO 66.4 | AdjD 67.0 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.642 (#192) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.612 (#195) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1025 (#192) | RD 121 | GP 34 |
2013 Schedule & Results
2013 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Smith
|
G | 31 | 34.9 | 16.1 | 3.9 | 2.8 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 2.4 | 4.2 | 17.6 | 57 | 8.1 | 24.1 | 47.3 | 39.8 | 89.2 | 0.7 | 171.7 | 60.1 |
J. Lee
|
G | 24 | 35.6 | 13.8 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 18.9 | 3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 33.3 | 25.0 | 77.1 | 0.07 | 219.5 | 37.5 |
Q. Ford
|
F | 33 | 32.3 | 12.2 | 5.8 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 16.6 | -19 | -0.6 | -0.8 | 39.1 | 33.3 | 76.0 | -0.11 | 205.1 | 46.6 |
R. Spencer
|
F | 33 | 30.3 | 9.8 | 6.0 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 14.6 | -38 | -1.2 | -1.8 | 51.9 | 0 | 61.4 | -0.03 | 167.6 | 51.9 |
D. Walker
|
G | 33 | 29.8 | 6.2 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 10.1 | 87 | 3.6 | 15.7 | 41.7 | 50.0 | 88.0 | 0.37 | 217.0 | 58.3 |
Z. Stahl
|
G | 29 | 16.7 | 5.7 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 6.8 | -11 | -0.4 | -0.9 | 34.4 | 0.0 | 78.6 | -0.2 | 216.2 | 34.4 |
D. Pollard
|
G | 33 | 16.4 | 5.6 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 5.8 | 44 | 1.2 | 2.5 | 48.4 | 51.5 | 63.6 | -0.04 | 133.6 | 61.7 |
D. Marshavelski
|
F-C | 27 | 6.7 | 2.9 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 0.9 | 2.8 | -33 | -1.2 | -5.3 | 58.3 | 0 | 50.0 | -0.48 | 148.3 | 58.3 |
M. Banegas-Flores
|
G | 25 | 12.4 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 4.1 | -30 | -1.2 | -3.8 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 28.6 | -0.08 | 302.9 | 33.3 |
D. Peck
|
G | 20 | 5.3 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 2.1 | 1 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.22 | 261.6 | 0.0 |
C. Avenant
|
G | 17 | 8.2 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.9 | -5 | -0.3 | -1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 80.0 | 0.2 | 70.7 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG