🐻⬇️🏀

North Carolina Central Eagles

Also known as: North Carolina Central Eagles
Program History

2013 Team Stats (1 games)

36.0
PPG
56.7
Opp
+10.4
Margin
22.6%
FG%
26.7%
3P%
57.1%
FT%
33.0
RPG
7.0
APG
18.0
TO
77.2
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 962 (#607) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1087 (#317) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 1111 (#45) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +18.9 (#252) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → +9.3 (#159) HCA +3.3
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -3.0 More → 0.349 (#132) NetEff -3.0
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 62.8 | AdjD 57.6 More → 0.615 (#88) AdjO 62.8 | AdjD 57.6
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.751 (#119) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.736 (#105) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 141 | GP 31 More → 1121 (#109) RD 141 | GP 31

2013 Schedule & Results

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
J. Ingram J. Ingram G 31 33.3 15.7 3.7 1.4 1.4 0.6 2.5 0.8 19.4 194 6.3 9.1 53.8 46.2 85.7 1.04 757.2 65.4
S. Kidd S. Kidd F 31 32.2 14.5 6.9 1.0 1.0 0.6 2.1 1.4 20.5 179 6.0 9.5 53.5 33.3 60.0 0.85 495.6 55.8
S. Williams S. Williams G 31 31.2 12.0 4.5 1.5 1.0 0.5 1.8 0.9 16.8 93 2.9 4.1 48.1 42.9 93.3 0.69 552.1 53.7
J. Copeland J. Copeland F 27 22.1 7.3 4.4 0.2 0.6 0.7 1.6 0.8 10.9 148 5.5 13.1 36.4 0 0.0 0.92 397.7 36.4
E. Anyaorah E. Anyaorah G 6 17.0 5.3 2.2 0.5 0.5 0.3 1.3 0.0 7.5 22 3.7 8.2 0 0 0 0.01 0 0
E. Chapman E. Chapman G 31 28.3 4.4 2.8 5.8 1.4 0.2 2.7 0.5 11.4 161 5.2 8.0 13.3 22.2 71.4 0.47 378.9 20.0
D. Ferguson D. Ferguson G 30 12.5 3.5 1.0 1.8 0.9 0.0 1.1 0.1 5.9 121 4.2 10.8 0.0 0 100.0 0.75 911.5 0.0
A. Houston A. Houston G 31 12.0 3.5 1.4 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.1 5.3 192 6.2 12.4 100.0 100.0 57.1 1.45 755.6 112.5
A. Galaya A. Galaya G 26 7.6 3.0 1.3 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.5 0.1 4.5 112 4.1 10.1 33.3 33.3 100.0 0.66 1018.0 50.0
K. Jawara K. Jawara F 25 19.6 2.8 3.2 1.6 0.6 0.2 1.0 0.3 7.0 129 5.2 9.6 25.0 0.0 25.0 0.44 363.7 25.0
D. Williams D. Williams - 21 7.9 1.6 2.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.0 3.5 102 2.6 4.4 0 0 0 0.91 0 0
J. Marrow J. Marrow - 6 2.7 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.2 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
N. Sims N. Sims - 5 3.0 0.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 6 0.9 4.8 100.0 0 0 -0.04 200.0 100.0
R. King R. King - 3 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 1.7 -6 -0.2 -0.6 0 0 0 0.32 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG