๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Miami

Also known as: Miami Hurricanes
Program History

2018 Team Stats (19 games)

73.3
PPG
67.1
Opp
+6.2
Margin
46.7%
FG%
35.0%
3P%
65.5%
FT%
34.7
RPG
13.2
APG
11.9
TO
-
Est. poss./game
75.1
Adj PPG
64.2
Adj Opp PPG
#43
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2017-2018
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 1305 (#32) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 1222 (#35) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +95 elo More โ†’ 1055 (#91) HCA +95 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +2.9 More โ†’ +11.9 (#44) HCA +2.9
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.8 More โ†’ +9.9 (#58) HCA +2.8
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.722 (#63) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +17.7 More โ†’ 0.885 (#41) AdjNet +17.7
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +17.8 More โ†’ 0.887 (#41) AdjNet +17.8
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 75.1 | AdjD 64.2 More โ†’ 0.731 (#43) AdjO 75.1 | AdjD 64.2
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 73.4 | AdjD 68.6 More โ†’ 0.608 (#80) AdjO 73.4 | AdjD 68.6
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.776 (#37) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.756 (#40) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 113 | GP 32 More โ†’ 1257 (#26) RD 113 | GP 32

2018 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2017-11-10 vs Gardner-Webb Runnin' Bulldogs W 77 - 45
2017-11-12 vs Navy Midshipmen W 89 - 55
2017-11-16 vs Florida A&M Rattlers W 90 - 59
2017-11-22 vs La Salle Explorers W 57 - 46
2017-11-25 vs North Florida Ospreys W 86 - 65
2017-11-29 @ Minnesota Golden Gophers W 86 - 81
2017-12-02 vs Princeton Tigers W 80 - 52
2017-12-05 vs Boston University Terriers W 69 - 54
2017-12-16 @ George Washington Revolutionaries W 59 - 50
2017-12-22 @ Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors W 75 - 57
2017-12-23 vs New Mexico State Aggies L 54 - 63
2017-12-25 vs Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders W 84 - 81
2017-12-30 @ Pittsburgh Panthers W 67 - 53
2018-01-03 @ Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets L 54 - 64
2018-01-07 vs Florida State Seminoles W 80 - 74
2018-01-13 @ Clemson Tigers L 63 - 72
2018-01-15 vs Duke Blue Devils L 75 - 83
2018-01-21 @ NC State Wolfpack W 86 - 81
2018-01-24 vs Louisville Cardinals W 78 - 75
2018-01-27 @ Florida State Seminoles L 94 - 103
2018-01-31 vs Pittsburgh Panthers W 69 - 57
2018-02-03 @ Virginia Tech Hokies W 84 - 75
2018-02-07 vs Wake Forest Demon Deacons W 87 - 81
2018-02-10 @ Boston College Eagles L 70 - 72
2018-02-13 vs Virginia Cavaliers L 50 - 59
2018-02-17 vs Syracuse Orange L 55 - 62
2018-02-19 @ Notre Dame Fighting Irish W 77 - 74
2018-02-24 vs Boston College Eagles W 79 - 78
2018-02-27 @ North Carolina Tar Heels W 91 - 88
2018-03-03 vs Virginia Tech Hokies W 69 - 68
2018-03-08 vs North Carolina Tar Heels L 65 - 82
2018-03-15 vs Loyola Chicago Ramblers L 62 - 64

2018 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
D. Hernandez D. Hernandez F 30 25.3 11.5 6.7 0.4 0.5 1.0 1.4 5.9 12.9 - - - - 58.0 0.0 66.7 - 84.9 58.0
B. Brown B. Brown - 18 33.8 11.3 7.1 3.9 1.4 0.8 2.3 7.8 14.4 - - - - 41.1 20.0 61.8 - 61.4 44.0
L. Walker IV L. Walker IV - 30 27.0 11.0 2.5 1.8 1.0 0.5 1.1 6.7 8.9 - - - - 38.5 29.6 70.7 - 75.4 45.8
C. Lykes C. Lykes G 30 21.5 9.8 1.2 2.2 0.8 0.0 1.8 6.1 6.1 - - - - 40.4 35.1 72.5 - 71.6 49.7
J. Newton J. Newton G 30 27.3 9.2 2.4 2.7 1.0 0.2 2.0 5.7 7.7 - - - - 46.8 30.0 63.8 - 70.0 48.5
D. Vasiljevic D. Vasiljevic G 30 22.3 8.7 2.5 0.5 0.4 0.1 0.5 5.2 6.4 - - - - 39.4 34.2 100.0 - 81.6 51.6
A. Lawrence II A. Lawrence II G 30 30.3 8.4 6.4 2.3 1.4 1.0 1.8 4.4 13.4 - - - - 44.7 41.8 65.4 - 81.4 53.4
E. Izundu E. Izundu C 30 14.9 5.1 3.9 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.9 2.6 6.9 - - - - 72.7 0 48.3 - 85.8 72.7
S. Waardenburg S. Waardenburg F 19 14.9 3.2 2.8 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.6 2.1 5.2 - - - - 46.2 57.1 83.3 - 72.0 61.5
R. Miller Jr. R. Miller Jr. C 15 3.5 1.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.7 0.9 - - - - 50.0 0 20.0 - 62.5 50.0
M. Robinson M. Robinson G 7 1.7 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 - - - - 50.0 50.0 0 - 75.0 75.0
C. Stowell C. Stowell F 7 1.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 - - - - 0.0 0.0 0 - 50.0 0.0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG