Miami
2017 Team Stats (13 games)
60.5
PPG
64.2
Opp
-3.7
Margin
41.3%
FG%
32.7%
3P%
69.6%
FT%
33.2
RPG
9.5
APG
12.0
TO
71.2
Pace
Model Outputs
2016-2017
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1406 (#85) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1484 (#50) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +33.8 (#56) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.273 (#63) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.256 (#61) | NetEff -9.2 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.548 (#56) | AdjNet +1.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.551 (#54) | AdjNet +1.8 |
2017 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-11-24 | vs | Stanford Cardinal | W | 67 - 53 |
| 2016-12-16 | vs | Florida Atlantic Owls | W | 76 - 56 |
| 2017-01-12 | vs | Notre Dame Fighting Irish | L | 62 - 67 |
| 2017-01-21 | @ | Duke Blue Devils | L | 58 - 70 |
| 2017-02-01 | vs | Florida State Seminoles | L | 57 - 75 |
| 2017-02-11 | @ | Louisville Cardinals | L | 66 - 71 |
| 2017-02-20 | @ | Virginia Cavaliers | W | 54 - 48 |
| 2017-02-25 | vs | Duke Blue Devils | W | 55 - 50 |
| 2017-02-27 | @ | Virginia Tech Hokies | L | 61 - 66 |
| 2017-03-04 | @ | Florida State Seminoles | L | 57 - 66 |
| 2017-03-08 | @ | Syracuse Orange | W | 62 - 57 |
| 2017-03-09 | @ | North Carolina Tar Heels | L | 53 - 78 |
| 2017-03-17 | vs | Michigan State Spartans | L | 58 - 78 |
2017 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D. Reed
|
G | 13 | 36.5 | 13.2 | 4.8 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 2.2 | 11.0 | 8.1 | - | - | - | 39.9 | 36.5 | 85.7 | - | 54.0 | 49.3 |
B. Brown
|
- | 13 | 33.7 | 13.0 | 4.9 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 9.4 | 11.3 | - | - | - | 45.9 | 31.6 | 76.3 | 0.45 | 57.1 | 50.8 |
J. Newton
|
G | 12 | 30.0 | 10.5 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.4 | 9.7 | 4.8 | -23 | -2.3 | -6.3 | 38.8 | 30.0 | 66.0 | -0.14 | 45.7 | 40.1 |
K. Murphy
|
F | 13 | 31.0 | 7.2 | 7.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.5 | 6.5 | 8.5 | 26 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 46.4 | 0 | 51.6 | 1.05 | 48.1 | 46.4 |
A. Lawrence II
|
G | 13 | 26.1 | 6.5 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 5.2 | 6.5 | 78 | 6.5 | 9.1 | 35.3 | 34.1 | 77.8 | 1.49 | 52.6 | 46.3 |
D. Vasiljevic
|
G | 13 | 18.4 | 4.8 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 4.9 | 1.8 | - | - | - | 32.8 | 28.0 | 77.8 | - | 46.4 | 43.8 |
D. Hernandez
|
F | 12 | 14.9 | 4.1 | 2.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 2.9 | 3.3 | - | - | - | 60.0 | 0 | 46.7 | - | 58.9 | 60.0 |
E. Izundu
|
C | 13 | 12.8 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 2.2 | 2.8 | - | - | - | 35.7 | 0 | 57.1 | - | 41.0 | 35.7 |
R. Miller Jr.
|
C | 5 | 3.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 34 | 3.1 | 5.5 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 1.51 | 33.3 | 33.3 |
C. Stowell
|
F | 2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
M. Robinson
|
G | 4 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | -0.2 | 27 | 2.5 | 5.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1.15 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG