๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Miami

Also known as: Miami Hurricanes
Program History

2012 Team Stats (6 games)

60.3
PPG
67.8
Opp
-7.5
Margin
39.0%
FG%
27.7%
3P%
65.5%
FT%
37.0
RPG
8.7
APG
14.3
TO
-
Est. poss./game
70.4
Adj PPG
61.6
Adj Opp PPG
#52
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2011-2012
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 1233 (#55) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 1149 (#78) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +101 elo More โ†’ 1037 (#117) HCA +101 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.2 More โ†’ +9.6 (#49) HCA +3.2
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.2 More โ†’ +8.5 (#62) HCA +3.2
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.683 (#84) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +16.2 More โ†’ 0.866 (#42) AdjNet +16.2
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +16.4 More โ†’ 0.869 (#42) AdjNet +16.4
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 70.4 | AdjD 61.6 More โ†’ 0.691 (#52) AdjO 70.4 | AdjD 61.6
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 68.3 | AdjD 63.1 More โ†’ 0.615 (#77) AdjO 68.3 | AdjD 63.1
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.731 (#57) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.717 (#61) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 101 | GP 33 More โ†’ 1161 (#71) RD 101 | GP 33

2012 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2011-11-11 vs Tennessee Tech Golden Eagles W 69 - 58
2011-11-15 vs Rutgers Scarlet Knights W 72 - 57
2011-11-19 vs North Florida Ospreys W 75 - 62
2011-11-22 vs Florida Gulf Coast Eagles W 60 - 50
2011-11-25 @ Ole Miss Rebels L 61 - 64
2011-11-29 @ Purdue Boilermakers L 65 - 76
2011-12-03 vs UMass Minutemen W 83 - 75
2011-12-06 vs Memphis Tigers L 54 - 71
2011-12-10 @ West Virginia Mountaineers L 66 - 77
2011-12-17 vs Florida Atlantic Owls W 93 - 90
2011-12-22 @ Charlotte 49ers W 76 - 61
2011-12-30 vs Appalachian State Mountaineers W 84 - 54
2012-01-02 vs UNC Greensboro Spartans W 99 - 89
2012-01-07 @ Virginia Cavaliers L 51 - 52
2012-01-10 @ North Carolina Tar Heels L 56 - 73
2012-01-18 vs Clemson Tigers W 76 - 73
2012-01-22 vs NC State Wolfpack L 73 - 78
2012-01-24 @ Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets W 64 - 49
2012-01-29 @ Boston College Eagles W 76 - 54
2012-02-01 vs Maryland Terrapins W 90 - 86
2012-02-05 @ Duke Blue Devils W 78 - 74
2012-02-09 vs Virginia Tech Hokies W 65 - 49
2012-02-11 @ Florida State Seminoles L 59 - 64
2012-02-15 vs North Carolina Tar Heels L 64 - 73
2012-02-18 vs Wake Forest Demon Deacons W 74 - 56
2012-02-21 @ Maryland Terrapins L 70 - 75
2012-02-26 vs Florida State Seminoles W 78 - 62
2012-02-29 @ NC State Wolfpack L 73 - 77
2012-03-03 vs Boston College Eagles W 77 - 56
2012-03-08 vs Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets W 54 - 36
2012-03-09 @ Florida State Seminoles L 71 - 82
2012-03-14 vs Valparaiso Beacons W 66 - 50
2012-03-19 vs Minnesota Golden Gophers L 60 - 78

2012 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
D. Scott D. Scott G 30 33.2 12.9 5.4 3.1 1.0 0.2 1.8 3.3 17.6 48 25 1.9 3.1 42.9 29.4 77.1 2.62 171.1 45.4
K. Kadji K. Kadji F-C 32 27.4 11.7 5.3 0.7 0.6 1.6 1.6 3.0 15.3 -34 27 -1.3 -2.7 53.6 41.7 65.3 -2.14 158.1 58.8
M. Grant M. Grant G 31 28.7 10.8 2.1 1.9 0.7 0.0 1.7 2.8 11.1 25 26 1.0 1.7 26.4 21.1 85.7 2.13 185.9 33.3
R. Johnson R. Johnson C 23 26.2 10.0 7.2 1.6 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.7 16.1 18 19 0.9 2.0 50.8 25.0 70.0 1.22 155.7 51.6
S. Larkin S. Larkin G 32 25.6 7.4 2.5 2.5 1.6 0.1 1.9 1.8 10.4 16 27 0.6 1.5 29.3 25.9 84.6 0.65 171.4 35.3
R. Brown R. Brown G 31 19.9 7.2 2.8 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.7 1.7 8.6 -9 24 -0.4 -1.2 40.4 41.9 64.3 -2.0 191.7 52.9
T. McKinney-Jones T. McKinney-Jones G 33 24.1 7.0 3.5 1.4 0.7 0.1 1.3 1.8 9.5 81 28 2.9 6.9 40.7 33.3 71.4 3.63 185.2 50.8
D. Jones D. Jones G-F 23 17.3 5.9 3.6 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.9 1.6 8.4 - - - - 62.2 33.3 61.1 - 150.3 63.5
G. Adams G. Adams G 18 17.7 4.7 2.2 0.9 0.6 0.1 0.8 0.4 7.4 -15 14 -1.1 -2.8 25.0 20.0 50.0 -2.06 478.6 31.2
E. Swoope E. Swoope F 21 12.8 2.6 1.9 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.3 5.0 -13 18 -0.7 -2.3 33.3 0 0.0 -2.8 419.3 33.3
R. Akpejiori R. Akpejiori F 20 7.3 1.8 1.6 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.3 0.2 3.7 23 16 1.4 8.2 20.0 0 50.0 1.13 266.3 20.0
R. Quigtar R. Quigtar G 4 3.0 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 -5 5 -1.0 -46.2 0 0 50.0 -1.49 113.6 0
J. Heller J. Heller G 3 1.3 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.3 -5 5 -1.0 -46.2 0 0 0 -1.49 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG