Iowa
2013 Team Stats (7 games)
64.7
PPG
62.9
Opp
+7.2
Margin
39.7%
FG%
26.0%
3P%
66.2%
FT%
35.7
RPG
14.9
APG
13.3
TO
81.3
Pace
Model Outputs
2012-2013
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1559 (#52) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1577 (#22) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1164 (#13) | HCA +147 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +38.0 (#21) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +22.6 (#25) | HCA +3.3 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.408 (#72) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.227 (#160) | NetEff -10.2 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.708 (#42) | AdjNet +7.7 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.712 (#41) | AdjNet +7.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.709 (#25) | AdjO 69.5 | AdjD 59.7 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.909 (#23) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.894 (#21) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1250 (#41) | RD 88 | GP 37 |
2013 Schedule & Results
2013 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D. Marble
|
G | 35 | 30.3 | 14.4 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 3.9 | 16.5 | - | - | - | 37.0 | 28.8 | 80.0 | - | 159.4 | 42.4 |
A. White
|
F | 36 | 29.2 | 13.1 | 6.0 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 17.1 | 172 | 4.5 | 6.7 | 47.2 | 17.4 | 68.4 | 1.01 | 150.5 | 48.8 |
M. Gesell
|
G | 32 | 25.5 | 8.4 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 3.1 | 10.4 | 206 | 6.1 | 10.5 | 35.0 | 23.1 | 81.5 | 1.7 | 119.8 | 39.5 |
M. Basabe
|
F | 36 | 18.7 | 7.0 | 5.2 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 2.0 | 11.4 | 88 | 2.4 | 5.3 | 50.7 | 0.0 | 57.1 | 0.47 | 157.7 | 50.7 |
Z. McCabe
|
F | 36 | 15.5 | 5.7 | 3.7 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 8.7 | 85 | 2.2 | 5.5 | 47.7 | 31.4 | 73.7 | 0.75 | 140.4 | 56.2 |
E. May
|
G-F | 36 | 21.3 | 5.1 | 3.7 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 9.4 | 127 | 3.3 | 5.9 | 44.0 | 30.8 | 88.9 | 1.06 | 169.6 | 48.0 |
A. Woodbury
|
C | 36 | 16.4 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 8.8 | 157 | 4.1 | 13.1 | 54.5 | 0 | 40.0 | 1.51 | 149.8 | 54.5 |
J. Oglesby
|
G | 35 | 16.4 | 4.5 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 1.9 | 4.9 | 103 | 2.8 | 5.8 | 24.2 | 22.8 | 100.0 | 0.72 | 117.3 | 34.1 |
A. Clemmons
|
G | 36 | 16.9 | 4.5 | 1.7 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 1.7 | 2.1 | 6.1 | 54 | 1.4 | 3.2 | 36.0 | 25.0 | 70.0 | 0.64 | 97.3 | 40.0 |
G. Olaseni
|
C | 35 | 10.8 | 2.7 | 2.6 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 5.4 | 73 | 2.0 | 6.3 | 50.0 | 0 | 61.1 | 0.49 | 137.1 | 50.0 |
P. Ingram
|
G | 18 | 6.4 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.2 | 10 | 0.5 | 2.4 | 44.4 | 0.0 | 37.5 | 0.01 | 67.9 | 44.4 |
D. Stokes
|
F | 11 | 3.5 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.5 | -14 | -1.2 | -10.8 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 50.0 | -0.28 | 103.1 | 33.3 |
K. Denning
|
G | 11 | 2.1 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.5 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 66.7 | 0 | - | 100.0 | 100.0 |
C. Rickert
|
- | 11 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.1 | - | - | - | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 150.0 | 100.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG