Indiana Pacers
2003 Team Stats (1 games)
103.0
PPG
115.0
Opp
-12.0
Margin
48.7%
FG%
23.8%
3P%
75.0%
FT%
43.0
RPG
30.0
APG
16.0
TO
94.1
Est. poss./game
94.5
Adj PPG
92.3
Adj Opp PPG
#9
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2002-2003
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 934 (#19) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1040 (#12) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 974 (#20) | HCA +84 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +2.2 (#9) | HCA +3.9 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +0.5 (#14) | HCA +3.6 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.584 (#6) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.632 (#3) | NetEff +4.7 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.567 (#9) | AdjNet +2.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.568 (#9) | AdjNet +2.4 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.549 (#9) | AdjO 94.5 | AdjD 92.3 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.511 (#14) | AdjO 93.2 | AdjD 92.7 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.503 (#15) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.496 (#15) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 987 (#17) | RD 189 | GP 88 |
2003 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-03-08 | @ | Portland Trail Blazers | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-03-09 | @ | Sacramento Kings | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-03-11 | vs | New Orleans Pelicans | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-03-12 | @ | Philadelphia 76ers | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-03-14 | vs | Utah Jazz | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-03-17 | vs | Portland Trail Blazers | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-03-19 | vs | Boston Celtics | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-03-21 | vs | Memphis Grizzlies | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-03-22 | @ | Atlanta Hawks | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-03-26 | vs | Philadelphia 76ers | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-03-28 | vs | Chicago Bulls | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-03-30 | vs | Phoenix Suns | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-04-01 | vs | Sacramento Kings | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-04-02 | @ | Cleveland Cavaliers | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-04-04 | @ | Detroit Pistons | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-04-06 | vs | Miami Heat | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-04-08 | @ | Chicago Bulls | L | 103 - 115 |
| 2003-04-11 | vs | Orlando Magic | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-04-13 | @ | Milwaukee Bucks | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-04-15 | @ | New York Knicks | - | Incomplete score |
| 2003-04-16 | vs | Brooklyn Nets | - | Incomplete score |
2003 Roster
Counting stats use played regular-season games. PM and RAPM use their separate model samples; PM GP shows that sample's game count.
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jermaine O'Neal
|
G | 1 | 43.2 | 38.0 | 13.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 1.0 | 22.0 | 37.0 | - | - | - | - | 72.7 | 0 | 85.7 | - | 75.8 | 72.7 |
| Brad Miller | G | 1 | 35.4 | 18.0 | 10.0 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 10.0 | 24.0 | - | - | - | - | 60.0 | 0 | 60.0 | - | 62.5 | 60.0 |
| Reggie Miller | G | 1 | 29.7 | 12.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 12.0 | 3.0 | - | - | - | - | 41.7 | 28.6 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
Metta World Peace
|
F | 1 | 39.1 | 12.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 12.0 | 7.0 | - | - | - | - | 33.3 | 0.0 | 80.0 | - | 42.3 | 33.3 |
| Austin Croshere | C | 1 | 9.6 | 8.0 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 | - | - | - | - | 40.0 | 33.3 | 75.0 | - | 59.2 | 50.0 |
| Al Harrington | G | 1 | 17.5 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 8.0 | - | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 100.0 | - | 79.8 | 50.0 |
| Jamaal Tinsley | G | 1 | 36.9 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 10.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 | - | - | - | - | 28.6 | 25.0 | 0 | - | 35.7 | 35.7 |
| Erick Strickland | F | 1 | 11.1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 5.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | - | 20.0 | 50.0 | 0 | - | 30.0 | 30.0 |
| Jonathan Bender | G | 1 | 17.4 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 | - | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 50.0 | - | 26.6 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG