๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Grambling

Model Outputs

2011-2012
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 570 (#336) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 664 (#336) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +101 elo More โ†’ 864 (#325) HCA +101 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.2 More โ†’ -24.2 (#345) HCA +3.2
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.2 More โ†’ -20.9 (#344) HCA +3.2
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.037 (#344) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -39.5 More โ†’ 0.010 (#345) AdjNet -39.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -39.9 More โ†’ 0.010 (#345) AdjNet -39.9
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 49.7 | AdjD 72.5 More โ†’ 0.112 (#345) AdjO 49.7 | AdjD 72.5
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 56.7 | AdjD 69.7 More โ†’ 0.234 (#344) AdjO 56.7 | AdjD 69.7
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.078 (#345) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.092 (#345) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 154 | GP 26 More โ†’ 625 (#338) RD 154 | GP 26

2012 Schedule & Results

2012 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
Quincy Roberts Quincy Roberts G 18 37.2 23.7 6.2 1.6 1.1 0.3 3.8 7.2 21.8 - - - - 47.3 34.9 78.7 -0.2 136.7 53.1
Xavier Rogers Xavier Rogers - 22 30.5 9.1 2.6 1.7 1.0 0.0 2.2 3.0 9.2 - - - - 36.9 25.8 70.0 - 144.1 43.1
Raschard Boatner Raschard Boatner G 3 31.0 8.0 3.0 2.0 0.3 0.0 4.3 0.0 9.0 - - - - 0 0 0 -2.53 0 0
P. Roberson P. Roberson C 26 29.5 7.7 7.5 0.4 0.4 2.7 1.1 2.2 15.3 -175 9 -19.4 -28.3 38.6 0 50.0 -4.12 161.4 38.6
Brandon Dorsett Brandon Dorsett G 18 25.7 7.0 2.8 1.8 1.1 0.2 2.8 2.6 7.4 - - - - 34.0 25.0 66.7 -2.46 114.7 37.2
Rondale Livas Rondale Livas - 26 24.7 4.3 3.0 2.1 1.0 0.0 3.4 0.9 6.1 - - - - 30.4 50.0 75.0 - 196.3 32.6
David Copeland David Copeland G 16 22.2 3.6 2.6 1.7 0.6 0.0 1.7 0.8 6.0 - - - - 33.3 0 70.6 -2.28 146.3 33.3
Bryant Purvis Bryant Purvis G-F 25 20.7 3.3 3.6 0.6 0.3 0.1 1.6 2.0 4.1 -146 9 -16.2 -29.0 29.4 20.0 70.0 -3.62 74.0 32.4
Demetri Wheeler Demetri Wheeler F 19 22.2 3.3 2.8 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.8 0.4 5.8 -120 8 -15.0 -32.8 50.0 0 0.0 -3.99 354.7 50.0
Roman Higgins Roman Higgins G-F 16 10.9 2.6 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.1 1.6 0.2 2.8 -90 8 -11.2 -31.2 33.3 50.0 75.0 -3.31 430.7 50.0
Steven Danridge Steven Danridge C 26 17.4 2.3 2.3 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.8 0.7 4.1 -140 9 -15.6 -33.1 47.1 0 16.7 -4.09 155.3 47.1

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG