Florida State
2022 Team Stats (5 games)
73.8
PPG
71.7
Opp
-1.3
Margin
41.2%
FG%
29.2%
3P%
69.3%
FT%
39.0
RPG
15.2
APG
11.6
TO
85.5
Pace
Model Outputs
2021-2022
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1148 (#173) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1280 (#107) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 974 (#511) | HCA +115 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +30.3 (#93) | HCA +2.7 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +15.6 (#124) | HCA +2.4 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.316 (#90) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.571 (#102) | NetEff +2.4 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.477 (#66) | AdjNet -0.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.477 (#66) | AdjNet -0.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.494 (#251) | AdjO 69.7 | AdjD 70.0 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.788 (#130) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.738 (#144) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1087 (#157) | RD 135 | GP 29 |
2022 Schedule & Results
2022 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. LaRavia
|
- | 1 | 40.0 | 18.0 | 13.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 10.0 | 26.0 | - | - | - | 70.0 | 100.0 | 75.0 | 1.35 | 76.5 | 75.0 |
C. Mills
|
- | 24 | 26.0 | 11.9 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 3.8 | 12.8 | -77 | -3.0 | -4.6 | 36.7 | 35.5 | 92.9 | 0.09 | 148.2 | 42.8 |
Matthew Cleveland
|
G | 13 | 26.8 | 11.5 | 4.1 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.2 | 5.7 | 10.8 | -105 | -3.6 | -5.8 | 44.6 | 18.2 | 45.5 | -0.07 | 89.0 | 45.9 |
M. Osborne
|
F | 10 | 29.4 | 11.3 | 7.5 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 2.7 | 17.7 | 5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 48.1 | 46.7 | 80.0 | 0.65 | 148.7 | 61.1 |
A. Polite
|
G | 16 | 27.5 | 9.6 | 6.0 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 2.8 | 15.4 | -32 | -1.3 | -2.0 | 38.6 | 35.0 | 81.8 | 0.39 | 142.5 | 46.6 |
N. Bohannon
|
F | 2 | 30.0 | 9.5 | 7.0 | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 17.0 | 18 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.34 | 0 | 0 |
R. Evans
|
G | 19 | 25.5 | 8.4 | 2.7 | 3.2 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 2.8 | 11.9 | -31 | -1.1 | -1.9 | 35.2 | 35.7 | 78.9 | 0.53 | 128.3 | 39.8 |
C. Fletcher
|
- | 19 | 16.4 | 6.8 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 8.8 | -77 | -2.7 | -6.6 | 48.8 | 18.2 | 66.7 | -0.11 | 147.8 | 51.2 |
Jo. Butler Jr.
|
- | 21 | 20.7 | 6.8 | 3.4 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 9.5 | -91 | -3.6 | -6.8 | 44.4 | 52.4 | 37.5 | 2.05 | 147.4 | 56.7 |
T. Ngom
|
C | 12 | 13.5 | 6.1 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 7.9 | -19 | -0.9 | -3.2 | 70.6 | 0 | 62.5 | 0.27 | 177.9 | 70.6 |
H. Prieto
|
F | 14 | 13.8 | 4.6 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 6.3 | -34 | -1.6 | -5.1 | 52.4 | 42.9 | 75.0 | -0.07 | 140.6 | 59.5 |
N. McLeod
|
- | 17 | 10.8 | 4.5 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 4.9 | -27 | -1.5 | -5.5 | 64.3 | 0 | 44.4 | -0.03 | 118.9 | 64.3 |
J. Warley
|
- | 29 | 19.4 | 3.7 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 1.2 | 0.3 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 6.6 | -28 | -0.9 | -1.9 | 28.6 | 33.3 | 83.3 | 0.85 | 93.1 | 33.7 |
W. Wilkes
|
G | 21 | 15.6 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 4.4 | -93 | -3.0 | -7.9 | 29.0 | 20.0 | 0.0 | -0.56 | 105.0 | 35.5 |
Q. Ballard
|
C | 8 | 3.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 2.0 | -35 | -2.1 | -14.7 | 66.7 | 0 | 50.0 | -0.32 | 63.0 | 66.7 |
I. Spainhour
|
- | 6 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 25.0 | 0 | - | 41.7 | 41.7 |
J. Lindner
|
G | 7 | 2.4 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.4 | -5 | -0.5 | -5.3 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | 75.0 | 0.0 |
S. Spencer
|
G | 1 | 17.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | -61 | -2.8 | -11.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.92 | 0 | 0 |
R. McAdoo
|
G | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
O. Jankovic
|
- | 1 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
C. Yates
|
- | 3 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
G. Thompson
|
- | 1 | 18.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -21 | -1.2 | -5.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.28 | 0 | 0 |
M. Thorpe
|
- | 5 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Q. Pemberton
|
- | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG