Columbia Lions
2011 Team Stats (6 games)
66.2
PPG
71.3
Opp
-0.5
Margin
38.0%
FG%
28.3%
3P%
74.8%
FT%
32.8
RPG
11.7
APG
10.7
TO
82.2
Pace
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1387 (#119) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1188 (#242) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +17.8 (#266) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.303 (#89) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.118 (#221) | NetEff -17.7 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.065 (#114) | AdjNet -23.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.064 (#114) | AdjNet -23.2 |
2011 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-11-12 | @ | La Salle Explorers | L | 71 - 82 |
| 2010-11-15 | vs | Maryland-Eastern Shore Hawks | W | 108 - 74 |
| 2010-11-17 | @ | St. John's Red Storm | L | 66 - 79 |
| 2010-11-20 | @ | Longwood Lancers | L | 76 - 95 |
| 2010-11-23 | vs | Colgate Raiders | W | 76 - 63 |
| 2010-11-28 | @ | American University Eagles | W | 64 - 62 |
| 2010-12-01 | @ | Bucknell Bison | L | 68 - 73 |
| 2010-12-04 | vs | Stony Brook Seawolves | W | 73 - 72 |
| 2010-12-07 | vs | Wagner Seahawks | W | 77 - 71 |
| 2010-12-11 | vs | Bryant Bulldogs | W | 76 - 72 |
| 2010-12-30 | @ | Maine Black Bears | W | 74 - 71 |
| 2011-01-02 | vs | Elon Phoenix | L | 69 - 70 |
| 2011-01-05 | @ | Lafayette Leopards | W | 76 - 73 |
| 2011-01-08 | vs | Union Dutchmen | W | 64 - 59 |
| 2011-01-15 | vs | Cornell Big Red | W | 79 - 75 |
| 2011-01-22 | @ | Cornell Big Red | W | 70 - 66 |
| 2011-01-28 | @ | Harvard Crimson | L | 66 - 77 |
| 2011-01-29 | @ | Dartmouth Big Green | W | 66 - 45 |
| 2011-02-04 | @ | Brown Bears | L | 79 - 87 |
| 2011-02-11 | vs | Princeton Tigers | L | 46 - 76 |
| 2011-02-18 | vs | Dartmouth Big Green | W | 67 - 60 |
| 2011-02-19 | vs | Harvard Crimson | L | 42 - 61 |
| 2011-02-25 | @ | Pennsylvania Quakers | L | 54 - 64 |
| 2011-02-26 | @ | Princeton Tigers | L | 61 - 66 |
| 2011-03-04 | vs | Yale Bulldogs | L | 81 - 87 |
| 2011-03-05 | vs | Brown Bears | W | 91 - 74 |
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N. Agho
|
G | 13 | 35.9 | 18.5 | 4.6 | 3.8 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 2.7 | 11.3 | 13.8 | - | - | - | 42.9 | 36.4 | 62.5 | - | 69.9 | 46.9 |
B. Barbour
|
G | 13 | 35.7 | 14.5 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 7.5 | 12.3 | - | - | - | 44.3 | 30.0 | 91.5 | - | 79.9 | 49.0 |
A. Ampim
|
F | 13 | 24.5 | 8.3 | 6.4 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 2.1 | 6.5 | 8.5 | - | - | - | 35.7 | 28.6 | 77.8 | - | 58.7 | 36.9 |
M. Lyles
|
G | 11 | 24.5 | 6.8 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.7 | 4.5 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 44.0 | 42.3 | 75.0 | - | 67.8 | 55.0 |
M. Cisco
|
C | 10 | 17.4 | 6.1 | 4.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 2.7 | 7.9 | - | - | - | 55.6 | 0 | 62.5 | - | 89.6 | 55.6 |
Z. Crimmins
|
C | 10 | 10.6 | 4.4 | 2.3 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 3.3 | 3.7 | - | - | - | 51.5 | 0.0 | 66.7 | - | 61.7 | 51.5 |
S. Frankoski
|
G | 13 | 20.6 | 4.3 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 3.5 | 3.5 | - | - | - | 22.2 | 18.8 | 50.0 | - | 59.9 | 28.9 |
J. Daniels
|
F | 7 | 18.9 | 4.1 | 4.9 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 2.4 | 6.3 | - | - | - | 47.1 | 0 | 80.0 | -0.14 | 75.5 | 47.1 |
B. Grimes
|
F | 3 | 14.0 | 3.7 | 4.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 3.3 | 5.7 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0.0 | 75.0 | - | 46.8 | 40.0 |
M. Craig
|
C | 12 | 10.8 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 3.4 | - | - | - | 30.0 | 0 | 83.3 | - | 75.1 | 30.0 |
M. Johnson
|
G | 9 | 9.6 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 30.8 | 22.2 | 0 | - | 69.2 | 38.5 |
S. Egee
|
G | 6 | 3.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 75.0 | 0.0 |
D. Feldmann
|
F | 8 | 8.5 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 1.4 | - | - | - | 50.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 50.0 | 50.0 |
D. Starks
|
G | 7 | 6.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.1 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 16.7 | 0.0 |
D. Kowalski
|
G | 8 | 3.9 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.1 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
V. Green
|
G | 8 | 3.6 | 0.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 1.2 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
Not enough players with both Numbers/Game and RAPM to plot.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG