Cincinnati
2023 Team Stats (19 games)
74.1
PPG
68.8
Opp
+4.5
Margin
44.0%
FG%
36.0%
3P%
69.5%
FT%
37.3
RPG
15.2
APG
11.0
TO
80.4
Pace
Model Outputs
2022-2023
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1226 (#103) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1331 (#66) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +36.9 (#41) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.535 (#51) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.651 (#78) | NetEff +5.5 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.569 (#57) | AdjNet +2.4 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.573 (#56) | AdjNet +2.5 |
2023 Schedule & Results
| Date | Vs/At | Opponent | Result | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-22 | vs | Ohio State Buckeyes | L | 53 - 81 |
| 2022-11-30 | vs | NJIT Highlanders | W | 86 - 60 |
| 2023-01-01 | @ | Temple Owls | L | 61 - 70 |
| 2023-01-05 | @ | Wichita State Shockers | W | 70 - 61 |
| 2023-01-08 | vs | Houston Cougars | L | 59 - 72 |
| 2023-01-11 | vs | East Carolina Pirates | W | 83 - 55 |
| 2023-01-14 | @ | SMU Mustangs | W | 54 - 52 |
| 2023-01-18 | @ | South Florida Bulls | W | 85 - 69 |
| 2023-01-22 | vs | Memphis Tigers | L | 68 - 75 |
| 2023-01-28 | @ | Houston Cougars | L | 69 - 75 |
| 2023-02-01 | vs | Tulsa Golden Hurricane | W | 81 - 55 |
| 2023-02-04 | vs | UCF Knights | W | 73 - 64 |
| 2023-02-07 | @ | Tulane Green Wave | L | 94 - 101 |
| 2023-02-19 | @ | UCF Knights | W | 73 - 71 |
| 2023-02-26 | @ | Memphis Tigers | L | 73 - 76 |
| 2023-03-05 | vs | SMU Mustangs | W | 97 - 74 |
| 2023-03-10 | vs | Temple Owls | W | 84 - 54 |
| 2023-03-11 | @ | Houston Cougars | L | 48 - 69 |
| 2023-03-15 | vs | Virginia Tech Hokies | W | 81 - 72 |
| 2023-03-18 | @ | Hofstra Pride | W | 79 - 65 |
| 2023-03-22 | @ | Utah Valley Wolverines | L | 68 - 74 |
2023 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L. Nolley II
|
- | 21 | 33.0 | 17.3 | 6.5 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 13.3 | 12.5 | 11 | 0.9 | 1.3 | 44.1 | 43.0 | 71.9 | 1.23 | 59.7 | 54.5 |
D. DeJulius
|
- | 21 | 33.3 | 13.5 | 2.7 | 6.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 11.3 | 9.9 | - | - | - | 37.0 | 29.4 | 88.2 | - | 52.8 | 42.2 |
Viktor Lakhin
|
C | 20 | 25.1 | 10.7 | 6.7 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 7.5 | 11.8 | - | - | - | 57.0 | 33.3 | 56.9 | 0.05 | 61.3 | 57.4 |
M. Adams-Woods
|
- | 21 | 31.6 | 9.3 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 8.0 | 6.0 | - | - | - | 42.5 | 39.3 | 61.5 | - | 56.7 | 53.0 |
J. Davenport
|
- | 21 | 24.8 | 7.6 | 4.3 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 7.2 | 5.7 | - | - | - | 35.1 | 33.1 | 71.4 | - | 50.9 | 48.0 |
Oguama, Ody
|
- | 21 | 22.0 | 5.9 | 6.2 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 4.6 | 7.6 | - | - | - | 52.6 | 0 | 48.6 | - | 54.7 | 52.6 |
D. Skillings Jr.
|
G | 21 | 14.9 | 5.0 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 5.2 | 3.4 | 40 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 35.8 | 17.5 | 57.7 | 1.01 | 43.2 | 39.0 |
K. Ezikpe
|
- | 18 | 7.1 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.7 | 4.1 | - | - | - | 71.0 | 0 | 92.9 | - | 83.4 | 71.0 |
R. Phinisee
|
- | 6 | 13.7 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.8 | 3.0 | - | - | - | 18.2 | 28.6 | 100.0 | - | 63.1 | 27.3 |
J. Reed
|
- | 1 | 16.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | -8 | -0.4 | -0.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 |
J. Reed
|
F | 18 | 6.7 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 1.0 | -8 | -0.4 | -0.6 | 18.2 | 28.6 | 50.0 | 0.6 | 29.5 | 27.3 |
C. Anthony
|
- | 8 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.5 | -10 | -0.8 | -1.3 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 100.0 | 0.69 | 51.5 | 33.3 |
S. Tolentino
|
F | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 60 | 6.7 | 16.1 | - | - | - | 1.24 | - | - |
Jarrett Hensley
|
- | 8 | 3.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
C. Kirkwood
|
- | 5 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | - | 0.0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG