Cal State Northridge
2011 Team Stats (1 games)
50.0
PPG
70.7
Opp
-1.1
Margin
29.0%
FG%
16.7%
3P%
57.1%
FT%
38.0
RPG
6.0
APG
27.0
TO
98.2
Pace
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1219 (#216) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1174 (#258) | - |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +17.2 (#284) | HCA +3.1 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.222 (#103) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.003 (#319) | NetEff -39.7 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.077 (#112) | AdjNet -21.6 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.075 (#112) | AdjNet -21.7 |
2011 Schedule & Results
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L. Daniel
|
F | 14 | 27.6 | 14.9 | 8.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 2.8 | 0.9 | 22.3 | 2 | 2.0 | 20.2 | 46.2 | 0 | 50.0 | 0.14 | 384.0 | 46.2 |
R. McLemore
|
G-F | 12 | 22.0 | 12.8 | 3.3 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 14.6 | -1 | -1.0 | -7.5 | 26.7 | 0.0 | 66.7 | 0.36 | 471.8 | 26.7 |
J. Greene
|
G | 14 | 20.1 | 7.1 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 7.7 | 12 | 12.0 | 162.7 | 38.1 | 20.0 | 83.3 | -0.13 | 190.3 | 42.9 |
V. McGhee
|
G | 14 | 21.3 | 6.6 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 8.0 | 23 | 23.0 | 151.6 | 47.1 | 41.7 | 100.0 | 0.6 | 242.2 | 61.8 |
M. Lizarraga
|
F | 14 | 19.4 | 5.9 | 4.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 9.9 | 23 | 23.0 | 208.3 | 57.1 | 0 | 66.7 | 0.29 | 246.4 | 57.1 |
R. Cody
|
G | 14 | 19.0 | 5.9 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 0.8 | 7.6 | -9 | -9.0 | -84.4 | 45.5 | 33.3 | 75.0 | 0.21 | 321.3 | 50.0 |
D. Lyles
|
G | 14 | 20.6 | 5.1 | 1.8 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 8.4 | -22 | -22.0 | -4061.5 | 52.9 | 42.9 | 83.3 | -1.24 | 183.3 | 61.8 |
A. Quinn
|
G | 14 | 16.1 | 4.5 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 6.1 | - | - | - | 33.3 | 50.0 | 100.0 | - | 215.2 | 37.5 |
T. Jacobs
|
F | 13 | 11.3 | 2.2 | 3.5 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 6.1 | -1 | -1.0 | -17.3 | 25.0 | 0 | 0.0 | -0.39 | 326.6 | 25.0 |
F. Eteuati
|
F | 12 | 6.9 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 3.2 | - | - | - | 66.7 | 100.0 | 0 | - | 158.3 | 75.0 |
J. Hayward-Mayhew
|
F | 14 | 7.8 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 2.1 | -24 | -24.0 | -1028.6 | 50.0 | 0 | 55.6 | -1.25 | 71.6 | 50.0 |
J. Mitchell
|
- | 12 | 8.9 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 3.5 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | - | 550.0 | 0.0 |
A. Jiles IV
|
G | 10 | 6.2 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.8 | - | - | - | 40.0 | 0 | 33.3 | - | 55.4 | 40.0 |
A. Henson
|
F | 1 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | -2.0 | 2 | 2.0 | 85.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
B. Smith
|
G | 1 | 3.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | - | - | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG