Wagner Seahawks
2011 Team Stats (2 games)
57.0
PPG
72.0
Opp
-15.0
Margin
37.0%
FG%
40.0%
3P%
80.0%
FT%
26.0
RPG
13.5
APG
15.5
TO
-
Est. poss./game
66.4
Adj PPG
69.8
Adj Opp PPG
#223
Scoring Rank
Model Outputs
2010-2011
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ | 819 (#272) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ | 963 (#201) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | 937 (#269) | HCA +91 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More โ | -3.9 (#227) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More โ | -6.1 (#259) | HCA +2.8 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ | 0.383 (#230) | - |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More โ | 0.306 (#235) | AdjNet -7.1 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More โ | 0.302 (#235) | AdjNet -7.3 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More โ | 0.423 (#223) | AdjO 66.4 | AdjD 69.8 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More โ | 0.429 (#251) | AdjO 67.5 | AdjD 70.6 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More โ | 0.362 (#242) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More โ | 0.364 (#245) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More โ | 901 (#239) | RD 158 | GP 27 |
2011 Schedule & Results
2011 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM GP | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tyler Murray
|
G | 15 | 36.5 | 15.7 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 1.3 | 0.2 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 19.5 | -19 | 24 | -0.8 | -0.9 | 30.0 | 25.0 | 77.8 | 0.73 | 246.2 | 35.0 |
Latif Rivers
|
G | 15 | 32.7 | 13.9 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 3.8 | 2.4 | 15.1 | -30 | 24 | -1.2 | -1.7 | 47.2 | 42.9 | 100.0 | -1.69 | 282.0 | 55.6 |
Chris Martin
|
G | 14 | 30.1 | 11.7 | 2.7 | 3.9 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 3.1 | 1.8 | 14.3 | 9 | 23 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 40.0 | 47.1 | 87.5 | -1.16 | 287.5 | 56.0 |
Orlando Parker
|
F | 15 | 25.4 | 9.4 | 5.7 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 15.2 | 53 | 24 | 2.2 | 4.1 | 35.0 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 2.94 | 337.6 | 35.0 |
Josh Thompson
|
F | 15 | 24.2 | 6.6 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 10.9 | -19 | 24 | -0.8 | -1.5 | 23.5 | 0 | 71.4 | 1.42 | 246.5 | 23.5 |
Naofall Folahan
|
C | 15 | 16.0 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 6.4 | -21 | 24 | -0.9 | -2.2 | 42.9 | 0 | 50.0 | -1.64 | 212.6 | 42.9 |
Danny Mundweiler
|
G | 15 | 18.5 | 3.8 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 4.9 | -58 | 24 | -2.4 | -5.3 | 37.5 | 40.0 | 66.7 | -3.94 | 267.9 | 50.0 |
Clifton Spiller
|
C | 14 | 10.0 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 5.3 | -37 | 21 | -1.8 | -7.7 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -3.15 | 1850.0 | 0.0 |
Clayfell Harris
|
C | 8 | 4.6 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 1.5 | -36 | 12 | -3.0 | -22.6 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -3.49 | 550.0 | 0.0 |
T.J. Czeski
|
G | 9 | 10.3 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 0.0 | 2.0 | -56 | 16 | -3.5 | -20.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -5.47 | 0 | 0 |
Ryan Schrotenboer
|
F | 8 | 6.6 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.4 | -8 | 16 | -0.5 | -3.4 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | -1.61 | 175.0 | 50.0 |
J. Daniell
|
F | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | 0 |
Brett Stewart
|
F | 2 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | - | - | - | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.42 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG