๐Ÿปโฌ‡๏ธ๐Ÿ€

Vanderbilt

Also known as: Vanderbilt Commodores, Vanderbilt
Program History

2011 Team Stats (22 games)

75.1
PPG
69.6
Opp
+5.5
Margin
46.3%
FG%
37.0%
3P%
73.7%
FT%
35.0
RPG
13.1
APG
12.1
TO
-
Est. poss./game
76.9
Adj PPG
63.5
Adj Opp PPG
#22
Scoring Rank

Model Outputs

2010-2011
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More โ†’ 1282 (#42) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More โ†’ 1219 (#36) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +91 elo More โ†’ 1067 (#73) HCA +91 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More โ†’ +14.3 (#21) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +2.8 More โ†’ +12.4 (#35) HCA +2.8
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More โ†’ 0.789 (#35) -
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet +21.5 More โ†’ 0.923 (#25) AdjNet +21.5
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet +21.7 More โ†’ 0.925 (#25) AdjNet +21.7
Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. AdjO 76.9 | AdjD 63.5 More โ†’ 0.772 (#22) AdjO 76.9 | AdjD 63.5
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 74.0 | AdjD 66.0 More โ†’ 0.675 (#36) AdjO 74.0 | AdjD 66.0
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.799 (#36) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More โ†’ 0.782 (#38) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 109 | GP 34 More โ†’ 1205 (#41) RD 109 | GP 34

2011 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2010-11-12 vs Presbyterian Blue Hose W 88 - 47
2010-11-18 vs Nebraska Cornhuskers W 59 - 49
2010-11-19 @ West Virginia Mountaineers L 71 - 74
2010-11-21 @ North Carolina Tar Heels W 72 - 65
2010-11-24 vs Grambling Tigers W 92 - 59
2010-11-27 vs Appalachian State Mountaineers W 86 - 73
2010-12-01 vs Western Kentucky Hilltoppers W 82 - 62
2010-12-04 vs Belmont Bruins W 85 - 76
2010-12-08 @ Missouri Tigers L 82 - 85
2010-12-18 vs SE Louisiana Lions W 85 - 52
2010-12-21 @ Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders W 72 - 53
2010-12-29 vs Marquette Golden Eagles W 77 - 76
2011-01-02 vs Davidson Wildcats W 80 - 52
2011-01-08 @ South Carolina Gamecocks L 75 - 83
2011-01-12 vs Georgia Bulldogs W 73 - 66
2011-01-15 @ Tennessee Volunteers L 64 - 67
2011-01-19 vs Ole Miss Rebels W 84 - 74
2011-01-22 vs Saint Mary's Gaels W 89 - 70
2011-01-27 @ Mississippi State Bulldogs W 81 - 74
2011-01-29 vs Arkansas Razorbacks L 78 - 89
2011-02-01 @ Florida Gators L 61 - 65
2011-02-05 vs South Carolina Gamecocks W 78 - 60
2011-02-10 vs Alabama Crimson Tide W 81 - 77
2011-02-12 vs Kentucky Wildcats W 81 - 77
2011-02-16 @ Georgia Bulldogs W 64 - 56
2011-02-19 @ Auburn Tigers W 77 - 60
2011-02-22 vs Tennessee Volunteers L 51 - 60
2011-02-26 @ LSU Tigers W 90 - 69
2011-03-01 @ Kentucky Wildcats L 66 - 68
2011-03-05 vs Florida Gators L 76 - 86
2011-03-10 vs LSU Tigers W 62 - 50
2011-03-11 @ Mississippi State Bulldogs W 87 - 81
2011-03-12 @ Florida Gators L 66 - 77
2011-03-17 vs Richmond Spiders L 66 - 69

2011 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM GP PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
John Jenkins John Jenkins G 24 35.5 19.7 3.0 1.3 0.8 0.2 1.6 11.5 11.9 224 29 7.7 10.2 43.8 37.1 89.2 3.65 72.8 55.1
Jeffery Taylor Jeffery Taylor F 26 33.7 15.9 6.0 2.5 1.2 0.6 2.7 10.2 13.3 181 31 5.8 8.5 46.0 37.2 72.2 0.63 67.1 51.5
Festus Ezeli Festus Ezeli C 26 24.6 13.2 6.0 0.2 0.5 2.8 1.9 6.9 13.9 283 31 9.1 17.3 58.7 0 66.4 5.69 71.9 58.7
Brad Tinsley Brad Tinsley G 26 33.5 10.9 3.5 4.6 0.8 0.1 1.7 6.5 11.8 228 30 7.6 10.2 45.2 38.0 83.8 2.73 71.7 53.3
Lance Goulbourne Lance Goulbourne F 25 25.6 6.3 7.6 1.5 0.4 0.4 1.4 4.1 10.6 188 29 6.5 11.3 42.7 26.2 63.8 1.75 63.9 48.1
Steve Tchiengang Steve Tchiengang F 26 15.7 4.2 2.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.9 2.8 3.7 -32 30 -1.1 -2.9 47.9 44.8 60.0 -3.35 64.3 56.8
Rod Odom Rod Odom F 26 15.3 3.2 2.1 0.3 0.4 0.1 1.0 2.3 2.9 15 31 0.5 1.4 42.4 39.5 57.1 -1.77 67.7 56.8
Andre Walker Andre Walker F 10 14.4 2.3 2.5 1.9 0.5 0.2 0.9 1.6 4.9 103 13 7.9 17.6 43.8 100.0 66.7 1.69 66.4 46.9
Kyle Fuller Kyle Fuller G 26 14.6 2.0 1.3 1.5 0.5 0.0 0.8 1.8 2.7 27 31 0.9 2.6 33.3 28.6 50.0 -1.14 47.1 37.5
Joe Duffy Joe Duffy F 9 2.7 0.9 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.9 0.7 7 10 0.7 8.3 37.5 66.7 0 -0.81 50.0 50.0
Jordan Smart Jordan Smart G-F 9 3.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.9 15 11 1.4 14.0 100.0 100.0 0 0.66 150.0 150.0
C. Meriwether C. Meriwether G 8 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0 9 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 0 -0.75 16.7 16.7
Aaron Noll Aaron Noll F 1 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - - 0 0 0 -0.83 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG