🐻⬇️🏀

Vanderbilt

Season: 2026 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017
Also known as: Vanderbilt Commodores, Vanderbilt
Program History
Coach: Kevin Stallings

2013 Team Stats (3 games)

49.3
PPG
60.1
Opp
+0.2
Margin
35.0%
FG%
29.2%
3P%
43.2%
FT%
26.0
RPG
9.0
APG
9.3
TO
68.1
Pace

Model Outputs

2012-2013
Catalog

Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.

Model Output Notes
Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → 1798 (#13) -
Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → 1413 (#82) -
Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +147 elo More → 1064 (#87) HCA +147 elo
Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. HCA +3.0 More → +32.0 (#68) HCA +3.0
Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. HCA +3.3 More → +17.4 (#59) HCA +3.3
Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → 0.468 (#63) -
Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. NetEff -37.3 More → 0.013 (#297) NetEff -37.3
Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. AdjNet -2.6 More → 0.425 (#71) AdjNet -2.6
Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. AdjNet -2.5 More → 0.429 (#72) AdjNet -2.5
Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. AdjO 63.1 | AdjD 56.5 More → 0.645 (#73) AdjO 63.1 | AdjD 56.5
Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.803 (#83) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD More → 0.786 (#81) Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD
Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. RD 125 | GP 33 More → 1085 (#137) RD 125 | GP 33

2013 Schedule & Results

Date Vs/At Opponent Result Score
2012-11-10 vs Nicholls Colonels W 80 - 65
2012-11-16 @ Oregon Ducks L 48 - 74
2012-11-22 @ Davidson Wildcats L 62 - 75
2012-11-23 vs Marist Red Foxes L 33 - 50
2012-11-25 @ UTEP Miners W 73 - 49
2012-12-01 vs Villanova Wildcats L 52 - 62
2012-12-06 @ Xavier Musketeers W 66 - 64
2012-12-15 vs Alabama A&M Bulldogs W 71 - 46
2012-12-17 vs Cornell Big Red W 66 - 55
2012-12-21 @ Middle Tennessee Blue Raiders L 52 - 56
2012-12-29 vs Butler Bulldogs L 49 - 68
2013-01-02 vs William & Mary Tribe W 64 - 50
2013-01-10 vs Kentucky Wildcats L 58 - 60
2013-01-12 @ Arkansas Razorbacks L 33 - 56
2013-01-15 vs Ole Miss Rebels L 79 - 89
2013-01-19 @ South Carolina Gamecocks W 58 - 51
2013-01-23 vs Auburn Tigers W 73 - 61
2013-01-26 @ Missouri Tigers L 59 - 81
2013-01-29 @ Tennessee Volunteers L 57 - 58
2013-02-02 vs Alabama Crimson Tide L 54 - 58
2013-02-06 @ LSU Tigers L 56 - 57
2013-02-09 vs Arkansas Razorbacks W 67 - 49
2013-02-13 vs Tennessee Volunteers L 46 - 58
2013-02-16 vs Texas A&M Aggies W 63 - 56
2013-02-20 @ Kentucky Wildcats L 70 - 74
2013-02-23 @ Mississippi State Bulldogs W 72 - 31
2013-02-27 vs Georgia Bulldogs W 63 - 62
2013-03-02 @ Auburn Tigers W 62 - 55
2013-03-06 @ Florida Gators L 40 - 66
2013-03-09 vs South Carolina Gamecocks W 74 - 64
2013-03-14 @ Arkansas Razorbacks W 75 - 72
2013-03-15 @ Kentucky Wildcats W 64 - 48
2013-03-16 @ Ole Miss Rebels L 52 - 64

2013 Roster

Minutes by Position

The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.

Player Pos GP MIN PTS REB AST STL BLK TO FGA Numbers PM PM/G PM/40 FG% 3P% FT% RAPM TS% eFG%
K. Johnson K. Johnson G 33 31.7 13.5 3.5 3.6 1.0 0.5 2.8 1.5 17.8 236 7.2 10.6 39.6 28.6 64.7 0.63 400.1 45.8
R. Odom R. Odom F 33 30.3 10.4 4.5 0.8 0.5 0.8 1.3 1.2 14.5 -75 -2.3 -3.2 26.8 33.3 75.0 -0.63 385.2 35.4
K. Fuller K. Fuller G 33 26.2 8.7 2.3 2.0 0.6 0.1 1.4 0.8 11.4 54 1.6 2.4 23.1 10.0 71.4 1.07 491.7 25.0
D. Parker D. Parker G 25 28.5 7.2 4.4 2.4 0.7 0.3 1.5 1.1 12.4 48 1.7 2.4 32.1 25.0 33.3 0.69 293.7 39.3
K. Bright K. Bright G 33 29.3 6.9 5.5 1.2 0.6 0.4 1.5 0.9 12.1 4 0.1 0.2 33.3 27.3 0.0 0.46 369.2 43.3
S. Jeter S. Jeter F 33 17.5 5.5 3.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.7 8.8 51 1.5 3.2 50.0 33.3 76.9 0.57 324.7 56.8
J. Henderson J. Henderson C 33 20.5 5.4 3.4 0.8 0.5 0.9 1.5 0.7 8.9 - - - 36.4 0 62.5 -0.22 346.8 36.4
S. Moats S. Moats F 31 16.6 3.0 2.9 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.7 0.4 6.0 32 1.0 2.4 45.5 66.7 60.0 0.45 356.1 54.5
J. Siakam J. Siakam F 25 9.2 2.0 2.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.6 3.6 -26 -1.0 -3.6 26.7 0.0 38.5 -0.05 123.1 26.7
A.J. Astroth A.J. Astroth F 8 5.2 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.6 0.8 -5 -0.6 -4.6 20.0 0.0 0 -0.19 40.0 20.0
C. Josephs C. Josephs G 5 1.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
N. Watkins N. Watkins G 4 1.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
A. Gendelman A. Gendelman - 2 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0
A. Kehris A. Kehris - 2 1.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 - - - 0 0 0 - 0 0

Numbers/Game vs RAPM

X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.

Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG