UL Monroe
2013 Team Stats (1 games)
52.0
PPG
72.6
Opp
-12.6
Margin
42.9%
FG%
25.0%
3P%
50.0%
FT%
32.0
RPG
12.0
APG
22.0
TO
77.2
Pace
Model Outputs
2012-2013
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 701 (#1103) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1099 (#313) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 849 (#579) | HCA +147 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +14.5 (#351) | HCA +3.0 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | -9.8 (#456) | HCA +3.3 |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.044 (#260) | NetEff -22.9 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.269 (#583) | AdjO 60.6 | AdjD 71.6 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.254 (#477) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.236 (#527) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 748 (#580) | RD 156 | GP 28 |
2013 Schedule & Results
2013 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. Olatayo
|
G | 23 | 30.8 | 15.8 | 5.8 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 3.0 | 19.1 | -178 | -7.7 | -12.6 | 44.3 | 25.0 | 59.1 | -0.72 | 228.4 | 47.1 |
T. Mackey
|
G | 27 | 32.3 | 11.0 | 2.7 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 11.5 | -185 | -6.9 | -10.6 | 41.8 | 44.4 | 83.3 | -0.55 | 214.0 | 56.7 |
J. James
|
F | 27 | 33.0 | 9.4 | 6.1 | 5.1 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 4.9 | 1.9 | 15.7 | 113 | 3.8 | 13.9 | 43.1 | 0.0 | 41.2 | 0.68 | 217.2 | 43.1 |
M. Hansberry
|
G | 17 | 25.3 | 7.5 | 2.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 9.9 | -129 | -7.6 | -12.5 | 50.0 | 16.7 | 100.0 | -0.76 | 339.0 | 52.8 |
R.J. McCray
|
G | 26 | 29.7 | 7.0 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 2.7 | 1.4 | 8.2 | -219 | -8.4 | -13.7 | 41.7 | 23.1 | 50.0 | -1.37 | 225.2 | 45.8 |
M. Brown
|
F | 27 | 27.5 | 6.1 | 5.4 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 10.4 | 74 | 2.1 | 6.0 | 62.1 | 0 | 20.0 | 1.72 | 264.4 | 62.1 |
T. Lindsey
|
F | 27 | 19.3 | 4.1 | 2.5 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 6.7 | -177 | -6.6 | -12.9 | 25.0 | 12.5 | 42.9 | -0.7 | 288.3 | 28.1 |
K. Koszuta
|
G | 27 | 15.3 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 1.8 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 0.4 | 5.3 | -75 | -2.9 | -7.5 | 16.7 | 16.7 | 0 | 0.11 | 420.8 | 20.8 |
I. Eke
|
F | 9 | 7.0 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 3.1 | -45 | -5.6 | -30.5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -0.55 | 650.0 | 0.0 |
T. Birchett
|
G | 8 | 4.5 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.0 | -65 | -9.3 | -37.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.69 | 0 | 0 |
C. Ponder
|
F | 1 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | -136 | -4.5 | -7.7 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -0.88 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG