Tennessee
2026 Team Stats (37 games)
78.8
PPG
69.6
Opp
+9.2
Margin
46.1%
FG%
33.4%
3P%
69.1%
FT%
42.5
RPG
17.1
APG
11.8
TO
83.1
Pace
82.2
AdjO
61.1
AdjD
#16
Rank
Model Outputs
2025-2026
Output is shown as model rating with league rank in parentheses when available.
| Model | Output | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Elo Elo Streaming paired-comparison rating with recency baked into sequential updates. More → | 1238 (#30) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Bradley-Terry Static logistic paired-comparison model with one team strength parameter. More → | 1296 (#19) | - |
| Bradley-Terry Recency Bradley-Terry Recency Static Bradley-Terry with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | 1176 (#9) | HCA +109 elo |
| Margin Margin Linear team-strength model fit on point differential instead of binary wins. More → | +21.1 (#16) | HCA +2.2 |
| Margin Recency Margin Recency Margin regression with exponential recency weights on newer games. More → | +33.5 (#13) | HCA +2.5 |
| Pythagorean Pythagorean Pythagorean win expectation from raw points scored and allowed. More → | 0.808 (#26) | - |
| Efficiency Efficiency Tempo-adjusted efficiency version of Pythagorean ratings. More → | 0.917 (#41) | NetEff +19.2 |
| Adjusted Efficiency Adjusted Efficiency Opponent-adjusted efficiency model with separate offensive and defensive components. More → | 0.962 (#14) | AdjNet +27.8 |
| Log Adjusted Log Adjusted Log-scale adjusted efficiency model that downweights blowout leverage. More → | 0.963 (#14) | AdjNet +28.2 |
| Points Off/Def Points Off/Def Raw points regression with separate offensive and defensive team parameters. More → | 0.871 (#16) | AdjO 82.2 | AdjD 61.1 |
| Points Off/Def Recency Points Off/Def Recency Off/def points regression with exponential recency weights. More → | 0.786 (#11) | AdjO 76.8 | AdjD 62.5 |
| Core Ensemble Core Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and points off/def. More → | 0.958 (#13) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Recency Ensemble Recency Ensemble Equal-logit blend of Elo, recency BT, recency margin, log-adjusted pyth, and recency points off/def. More → | 0.943 (#12) | Blend of Elo, BT, Margin, PythLog, PtsOD |
| Dynamic Bradley-Terry Dynamic Bradley-Terry Time-evolving paired-comparison model with latent team strength drift. More → | 1329 (#19) | RD 89 | GP 37 |
2026 Schedule & Results
2026 Roster
Minutes by Position
The surface stays filled across the five on-court roles. Use the labels or legend to isolate how each player absorbs guard-to-big minutes.
| Player | Pos | GP | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | FGA | Numbers | PM | PM/G | PM/40 | FG% | 3P% | FT% | RAPM | TS% | eFG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
J. Gillespie
|
- | 37 | 34.8 | 18.4 | 2.8 | 5.4 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 2.3 | 15.3 | 11.4 | 1 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 41.0 | 33.8 | 81.4 | 0.33 | 54.3 | 50.1 |
Nate Ament
|
- | 35 | 29.7 | 16.7 | 6.3 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 12.3 | 12.5 | -2 | -0.2 | -2.9 | 39.9 | 33.3 | 79.0 | 0.34 | 54.3 | 45.2 |
J.P. Estrella
|
F | 33 | 18.3 | 10.0 | 5.4 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 7.1 | 8.8 | 170 | 8.9 | 26.8 | 59.6 | 40.0 | 63.4 | 0.35 | 61.8 | 60.4 |
F. Okpara
|
F | 35 | 26.9 | 8.0 | 6.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 5.5 | 10.2 | -25 | -1.9 | -37.2 | 59.7 | 36.4 | 63.5 | 0.31 | 62.4 | 60.7 |
J. Carey
|
F | 37 | 18.4 | 7.4 | 6.0 | 1.3 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 6.1 | 8.1 | -62 | -5.6 | -176.5 | 48.7 | 0.0 | 49.1 | -0.04 | 49.9 | 48.7 |
B. Boswell
|
- | 34 | 26.5 | 6.2 | 4.4 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 1.6 | 4.6 | 8.9 | 116 | 6.4 | 11.7 | 42.7 | 38.5 | 66.7 | 1.22 | 56.2 | 52.2 |
Dewayne Brown Ii
|
- | 35 | 14.6 | 4.8 | 3.6 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.9 | 3.3 | 5.7 | 77 | 4.1 | 11.4 | 58.6 | 0 | 66.0 | 0.94 | 61.1 | 58.6 |
Amari Evans
|
- | 35 | 14.4 | 4.1 | 3.2 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 3.7 | 4.9 | -65 | -6.5 | -210.0 | 41.9 | 22.0 | 57.5 | -0.07 | 48.4 | 46.1 |
C. Phillips
|
F | 10 | 16.8 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 6.2 | 57 | 5.7 | 20.7 | 65.4 | 0 | 30.8 | 0.14 | 59.9 | 65.4 |
A. Abram
|
G | 25 | 10.6 | 3.2 | 1.4 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 2.6 | 3.0 | -27 | -2.5 | -71.0 | 39.4 | 36.8 | 77.8 | -0.03 | 54.1 | 50.0 |
Ethan Burg
|
- | 31 | 10.7 | 2.5 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 2.0 | 2.1 | -23 | -3.8 | -115.0 | 44.3 | 40.5 | 81.8 | 0.04 | 59.2 | 56.6 |
Troy Henderson
|
- | 29 | 6.7 | 1.7 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 1.8 | 1.4 | -47 | -6.7 | -228.3 | 32.1 | 33.3 | 0.0 | -0.08 | 45.8 | 46.2 |
Clarence Massamba
|
- | 12 | 3.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 33 | 4.1 | 42.1 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 50.0 | 0.38 | 25.4 | 21.4 |
G. Hurst
|
- | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | -2.0 | -6 | -3.0 | -150.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | -0.14 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
G. Paull
|
- | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | -2.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
C. Duncan
|
- | 1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -0.0 | 0 | 0 |
Numbers/Game vs RAPM
X-axis = Numbers/Game (PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA), Y-axis = RAPM.
Advanced: Numbers = PTS+REB+AST+STL+BLK-TO-FGA, PM = total +/-, PM/G = per game, PM/40 = per 40 minutes, RAPM = Regularized Adj Plus-Minus, TS% = True Shooting, eFG% = Effective FG